All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] locking/Kconfig: Don't forcefully uninline spin_unlock for PREEMPT
@ 2020-05-30  5:00 Sultan Alsawaf
  2020-05-30  5:09 ` [PATCH v2] " Sultan Alsawaf
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Sultan Alsawaf @ 2020-05-30  5:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  Cc: Ingo Molnar, Thomas Gleixner, Julia Cartwright,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira, Srivatsa S. Bhat (VMware),
	Marc Zyngier, Sultan Alsawaf, linux-kernel

From: Sultan Alsawaf <sultan@kerneltoast.com>

This change was originally done in 2005 without any justification in
commit bda98685b855 ("[PATCH] x86: inline spin_unlock if
!CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK and !CONFIG_PREEMPT"). Perhaps the reasoning at
the time was that PREEMPT was still considered unstable and needed extra
debugging; however, this is no longer the case, so remove the artificial
limitation.

Signed-off-by: Sultan Alsawaf <sultan@kerneltoast.com>
---
 kernel/Kconfig.preempt | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/Kconfig.preempt b/kernel/Kconfig.preempt
index bf82259cff96..5a9e0409c844 100644
--- a/kernel/Kconfig.preempt
+++ b/kernel/Kconfig.preempt
@@ -39,7 +39,6 @@ config PREEMPT
 	bool "Preemptible Kernel (Low-Latency Desktop)"
 	depends on !ARCH_NO_PREEMPT
 	select PREEMPTION
-	select UNINLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK if !ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK
 	help
 	  This option reduces the latency of the kernel by making
 	  all kernel code (that is not executing in a critical section)
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2] locking/Kconfig: Don't forcefully uninline spin_unlock for PREEMPT
  2020-05-30  5:00 [PATCH] locking/Kconfig: Don't forcefully uninline spin_unlock for PREEMPT Sultan Alsawaf
@ 2020-05-30  5:09 ` Sultan Alsawaf
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Sultan Alsawaf @ 2020-05-30  5:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  Cc: sultan, bristot, julia, linux-kernel, maz, mingo, srivatsa, tglx

From: Sultan Alsawaf <sultan@kerneltoast.com>

This change was originally done in 2005 without any justification in
commit bda98685b855 ("[PATCH] x86: inline spin_unlock if
!CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK and !CONFIG_PREEMPT"). Perhaps the reasoning at
the time was that PREEMPT was still considered unstable and needed extra
debugging; however, this is no longer the case, so remove the artificial
limitation.

Signed-off-by: Sultan Alsawaf <sultan@kerneltoast.com>
---
 kernel/Kconfig.locks   | 10 +++++-----
 kernel/Kconfig.preempt |  1 -
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/Kconfig.locks b/kernel/Kconfig.locks
index 3de8fd11873b..2d992f5c6ec3 100644
--- a/kernel/Kconfig.locks
+++ b/kernel/Kconfig.locks
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ config INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK_BH
 
 config INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK_IRQ
 	def_bool y
-	depends on !PREEMPTION || ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK_IRQ
+	depends on ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK_IRQ
 
 config INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK_IRQRESTORE
 	def_bool y
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ config INLINE_READ_LOCK_IRQSAVE
 
 config INLINE_READ_UNLOCK
 	def_bool y
-	depends on !PREEMPTION || ARCH_INLINE_READ_UNLOCK
+	depends on ARCH_INLINE_READ_UNLOCK
 
 config INLINE_READ_UNLOCK_BH
 	def_bool y
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ config INLINE_READ_UNLOCK_BH
 
 config INLINE_READ_UNLOCK_IRQ
 	def_bool y
-	depends on !PREEMPTION || ARCH_INLINE_READ_UNLOCK_IRQ
+	depends on ARCH_INLINE_READ_UNLOCK_IRQ
 
 config INLINE_READ_UNLOCK_IRQRESTORE
 	def_bool y
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ config INLINE_WRITE_LOCK_IRQSAVE
 
 config INLINE_WRITE_UNLOCK
 	def_bool y
-	depends on !PREEMPTION || ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_UNLOCK
+	depends on ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_UNLOCK
 
 config INLINE_WRITE_UNLOCK_BH
 	def_bool y
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ config INLINE_WRITE_UNLOCK_BH
 
 config INLINE_WRITE_UNLOCK_IRQ
 	def_bool y
-	depends on !PREEMPTION || ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_UNLOCK_IRQ
+	depends on ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_UNLOCK_IRQ
 
 config INLINE_WRITE_UNLOCK_IRQRESTORE
 	def_bool y
diff --git a/kernel/Kconfig.preempt b/kernel/Kconfig.preempt
index bf82259cff96..5a9e0409c844 100644
--- a/kernel/Kconfig.preempt
+++ b/kernel/Kconfig.preempt
@@ -39,7 +39,6 @@ config PREEMPT
 	bool "Preemptible Kernel (Low-Latency Desktop)"
 	depends on !ARCH_NO_PREEMPT
 	select PREEMPTION
-	select UNINLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK if !ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK
 	help
 	  This option reduces the latency of the kernel by making
 	  all kernel code (that is not executing in a critical section)
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-05-30  5:09 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-05-30  5:00 [PATCH] locking/Kconfig: Don't forcefully uninline spin_unlock for PREEMPT Sultan Alsawaf
2020-05-30  5:09 ` [PATCH v2] " Sultan Alsawaf

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.