From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <a.darwish@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
"Sebastian A. Siewior" <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] seqlock: seqcount_t call sites bugfixes
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 09:28:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200604072841.GR20149@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200603144949.1122421-1-a.darwish@linutronix.de>
On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 04:49:43PM +0200, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since patch #7 and #8 from the series:
>
> [PATCH v1 00/25] seqlock: Extend seqcount API with associated locks
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200519214547.352050-1-a.darwish@linutronix.de
>
> are now pending on the lockdep/x86 IRQ state tracking patch series:
>
> [PATCH 00/14] x86/entry: disallow #DB more and x86/entry lockdep/nmi
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200529212728.795169701@infradead.org
>
> [PATCH v3 0/5] lockdep: Change IRQ state tracking to use per-cpu variables
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200529213550.683440625@infradead.org
>
> This is a repost only of the seqcount_t call sites bugfixes that were on
> top of the seqlock patch series.
>
> These fixes are independent, and can thus be merged on their own. I'm
> reposting them now so they can at least hit -rc2 or -rc3.
I'm confused on what I should do with patch 6 here for dma-buf. Looks like
just a good cleanup/prep work, so I'd queue it for linux-next and 5.9, but
sounds like you want this in earlier. Do you need this in 5.8-rc for some
work meant for 5.9? Will this go in through some topic branch directly?
Should I apply it?
Patch itself lgtm, I'm just confused what I should do with it.
-Daniel
>
> Changelog-v2:
>
> - patch #1: Add a missing up_read() on netdev_get_name() error path
> exit. Thanks to Dan/kbuild-bot report.
>
> - patch #4: new patch, invalid preemptible context found by the new
> lockdep checks added in the seqlock series + kbuild-bot.
>
> Thanks,
>
> 8<--------------
>
> Ahmed S. Darwish (6):
> net: core: device_rename: Use rwsem instead of a seqcount
> net: phy: fixed_phy: Remove unused seqcount
> u64_stats: Document writer non-preemptibility requirement
> net: mdiobus: Disable preemption upon u64_stats update
> block: nr_sects_write(): Disable preemption on seqcount write
> dma-buf: Remove custom seqcount lockdep class key
>
> block/blk.h | 2 ++
> drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c | 9 +------
> drivers/net/phy/fixed_phy.c | 26 ++++++++------------
> drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c | 2 ++
> include/linux/dma-resv.h | 2 --
> include/linux/u64_stats_sync.h | 43 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
> net/core/dev.c | 40 ++++++++++++++-----------------
> 7 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-)
>
> base-commit: 3d77e6a8804abcc0504c904bd6e5cdf3a5cf8162
> --
> 2.20.1
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <a.darwish@linutronix.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Sebastian A. Siewior" <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] seqlock: seqcount_t call sites bugfixes
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 09:28:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200604072841.GR20149@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200603144949.1122421-1-a.darwish@linutronix.de>
On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 04:49:43PM +0200, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since patch #7 and #8 from the series:
>
> [PATCH v1 00/25] seqlock: Extend seqcount API with associated locks
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200519214547.352050-1-a.darwish@linutronix.de
>
> are now pending on the lockdep/x86 IRQ state tracking patch series:
>
> [PATCH 00/14] x86/entry: disallow #DB more and x86/entry lockdep/nmi
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200529212728.795169701@infradead.org
>
> [PATCH v3 0/5] lockdep: Change IRQ state tracking to use per-cpu variables
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200529213550.683440625@infradead.org
>
> This is a repost only of the seqcount_t call sites bugfixes that were on
> top of the seqlock patch series.
>
> These fixes are independent, and can thus be merged on their own. I'm
> reposting them now so they can at least hit -rc2 or -rc3.
I'm confused on what I should do with patch 6 here for dma-buf. Looks like
just a good cleanup/prep work, so I'd queue it for linux-next and 5.9, but
sounds like you want this in earlier. Do you need this in 5.8-rc for some
work meant for 5.9? Will this go in through some topic branch directly?
Should I apply it?
Patch itself lgtm, I'm just confused what I should do with it.
-Daniel
>
> Changelog-v2:
>
> - patch #1: Add a missing up_read() on netdev_get_name() error path
> exit. Thanks to Dan/kbuild-bot report.
>
> - patch #4: new patch, invalid preemptible context found by the new
> lockdep checks added in the seqlock series + kbuild-bot.
>
> Thanks,
>
> 8<--------------
>
> Ahmed S. Darwish (6):
> net: core: device_rename: Use rwsem instead of a seqcount
> net: phy: fixed_phy: Remove unused seqcount
> u64_stats: Document writer non-preemptibility requirement
> net: mdiobus: Disable preemption upon u64_stats update
> block: nr_sects_write(): Disable preemption on seqcount write
> dma-buf: Remove custom seqcount lockdep class key
>
> block/blk.h | 2 ++
> drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c | 9 +------
> drivers/net/phy/fixed_phy.c | 26 ++++++++------------
> drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c | 2 ++
> include/linux/dma-resv.h | 2 --
> include/linux/u64_stats_sync.h | 43 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
> net/core/dev.c | 40 ++++++++++++++-----------------
> 7 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-)
>
> base-commit: 3d77e6a8804abcc0504c904bd6e5cdf3a5cf8162
> --
> 2.20.1
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-04 7:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-03 14:49 [PATCH v2 0/6] seqlock: seqcount_t call sites bugfixes Ahmed S. Darwish
2020-06-03 14:49 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2020-06-03 14:49 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] net: core: device_rename: Use rwsem instead of a seqcount Ahmed S. Darwish
2020-06-05 14:11 ` Sasha Levin
2020-06-03 14:49 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] net: phy: fixed_phy: Remove unused seqcount Ahmed S. Darwish
2020-06-03 16:19 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-06-03 14:49 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] u64_stats: Document writer non-preemptibility requirement Ahmed S. Darwish
2020-06-03 14:49 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] net: mdiobus: Disable preemption upon u64_stats update Ahmed S. Darwish
2020-06-03 14:49 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] block: nr_sects_write(): Disable preemption on seqcount write Ahmed S. Darwish
2020-06-05 3:22 ` Jens Axboe
2020-06-05 14:10 ` Sasha Levin
2020-06-03 14:49 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] dma-buf: Remove custom seqcount lockdep class key Ahmed S. Darwish
2020-06-03 14:49 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2020-06-04 8:49 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-06-04 8:49 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-06-04 7:28 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2020-06-04 7:28 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] seqlock: seqcount_t call sites bugfixes Daniel Vetter
2020-06-04 8:41 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2020-06-04 8:41 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2020-06-04 22:50 ` David Miller
2020-06-04 22:50 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200604072841.GR20149@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=a.darwish@linutronix.de \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.