All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
To: lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [netfilter] e32a4dc651: BUG:using_smp_processor_id()in_preemptible
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2020 00:23:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200605002323.501b1cc6@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200603084934.GF12456@shao2-debian>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 974 bytes --]

Hi,

On Wed, 3 Jun 2020 16:49:34 +0800
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:

> Greeting,
> 
> FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-7):
> 
> commit: e32a4dc6512ce3c1a1920531246e7037896e510a ("netfilter: nf_tables: make sets built-in")
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> 
> in testcase: kernel-selftests
> with following parameters:
> 
> 	group: kselftests-netfilter

I couldn't find this information in the report. Would it be possible to
have here an indication of what kselftest specifically is failing?
There are a number of tests in that group. I have an obvious suspicion
here (nft_concat_range.sh), but it would be nice to know, in general.

> [...]
>
> [  165.316525] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: nft/6247
> [  165.319547] caller is nft_pipapo_insert+0x464/0x610 [nf_tables]

I'll take care of this, thanks Florian for forwarding.

-- 
Stefano

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [netfilter] e32a4dc651: BUG:using_smp_processor_id()in_preemptible
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2020 00:23:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200605002323.501b1cc6@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200603084934.GF12456@shao2-debian>

Hi,

On Wed, 3 Jun 2020 16:49:34 +0800
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:

> Greeting,
> 
> FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-7):
> 
> commit: e32a4dc6512ce3c1a1920531246e7037896e510a ("netfilter: nf_tables: make sets built-in")
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> 
> in testcase: kernel-selftests
> with following parameters:
> 
> 	group: kselftests-netfilter

I couldn't find this information in the report. Would it be possible to
have here an indication of what kselftest specifically is failing?
There are a number of tests in that group. I have an obvious suspicion
here (nft_concat_range.sh), but it would be nice to know, in general.

> [...]
>
> [  165.316525] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: nft/6247
> [  165.319547] caller is nft_pipapo_insert+0x464/0x610 [nf_tables]

I'll take care of this, thanks Florian for forwarding.

-- 
Stefano


  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-04 22:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-03  8:49 [netfilter] e32a4dc651: BUG:using_smp_processor_id()in_preemptible kernel test robot
2020-06-03  8:49 ` kernel test robot
2020-06-04 22:23 ` Stefano Brivio [this message]
2020-06-04 22:23   ` Stefano Brivio
2020-06-05  0:15   ` Liu Yiding
2020-06-05  0:15     ` [LKP] " Liu Yiding
2020-06-05  0:25     ` Stefano Brivio
2020-06-05  0:25       ` [LKP] " Stefano Brivio

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200605002323.501b1cc6@redhat.com \
    --to=sbrivio@redhat.com \
    --cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.