From: Drew Fustini <drew@beagleboard.org>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@linaro.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Cc: Jason Kridner <jkridner@beagleboard.org>,
Robert Nelson <robertcnelson@beagleboard.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] pinctrl-single: fix pcs_parse_pinconf() return value
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 14:51:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200608125143.GA2789203@x1> (raw)
This patch causes pcs_parse_pinconf() to return -ENOTSUPP when no
pinctrl_map is added. The current behavior is to return 0 when
!PCS_HAS_PINCONF or !nconfs. Thus pcs_parse_one_pinctrl_entry()
incorrectly assumes that a map was added and sets num_maps = 2.
Analysis:
=========
The function pcs_parse_one_pinctrl_entry() calls pcs_parse_pinconf()
if PCS_HAS_PINCONF is enabled. The function pcs_parse_pinconf()
returns 0 to indicate there was no error and num_maps is then set to 2:
980 static int pcs_parse_one_pinctrl_entry(struct pcs_device *pcs,
981 struct device_node *np,
982 struct pinctrl_map **map,
983 unsigned *num_maps,
984 const char **pgnames)
985 {
<snip>
1053 (*map)->type = PIN_MAP_TYPE_MUX_GROUP;
1054 (*map)->data.mux.group = np->name;
1055 (*map)->data.mux.function = np->name;
1056
1057 if (PCS_HAS_PINCONF && function) {
1058 res = pcs_parse_pinconf(pcs, np, function, map);
1059 if (res)
1060 goto free_pingroups;
1061 *num_maps = 2;
1062 } else {
1063 *num_maps = 1;
1064 }
However, pcs_parse_pinconf() will also return 0 if !PCS_HAS_PINCONF or
!nconfs. I believe these conditions should indicate that no map was
added by returning -ENOTSUPP. Otherwise pcs_parse_one_pinctrl_entry()
will set num_maps = 2 even though no maps were successfully added, as
it does not reach "m++" on line 940:
895 static int pcs_parse_pinconf(struct pcs_device *pcs, struct device_node *np,
896 struct pcs_function *func,
897 struct pinctrl_map **map)
898
899 {
900 struct pinctrl_map *m = *map;
<snip>
917 /* If pinconf isn't supported, don't parse properties in below. */
918 if (!PCS_HAS_PINCONF)
919 return 0;
920
921 /* cacluate how much properties are supported in current node */
922 for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(prop2); i++) {
923 if (of_find_property(np, prop2[i].name, NULL))
924 nconfs++;
925 }
926 for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(prop4); i++) {
927 if (of_find_property(np, prop4[i].name, NULL))
928 nconfs++;
929 }
930 if (!nconfs)
919 return 0;
932
933 func->conf = devm_kcalloc(pcs->dev,
934 nconfs, sizeof(struct pcs_conf_vals),
935 GFP_KERNEL);
936 if (!func->conf)
937 return -ENOMEM;
938 func->nconfs = nconfs;
939 conf = &(func->conf[0]);
940 m++;
This situtation will cause a boot failure [0] on the BeagleBone Black
(AM3358) when am33xx_pinmux node in arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx-l4.dtsi
has compatible = "pinconf-single" instead of "pinctrl-single".
The patch fixes this issue by returning -ENOSUPP when !PCS_HAS_PINCONF
or !nconfs, so that pcs_parse_one_pinctrl_entry() will know that no
map was added.
Logic is also added to pcs_parse_one_pinctrl_entry() to distinguish
between -ENOSUPP and other errors. In the case of -ENOSUPP, num_maps
is set to 1 as it is valid for pinconf to be enabled and a given pin
group to not any pinconf properties.
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-omap/20200529175544.GA3766151@x1/
Fixes: 9dddb4df90d1 ("pinctrl: single: support generic pinconf")
Signed-off-by: Drew Fustini <drew@beagleboard.org>
---
changes from V1 [0]:
- if pcs_parse_pinconf() returns -ENOSUPP, then set num_maps to 1 and
proceed normally as it is valid for group to have no pinconf props
- added Fixes: tag thanks to Gustavo A. R. Silva
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-omap/20200531204147.GA664833@x1/
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c | 11 +++++++----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
index 1e0614daee9b..a9d511982780 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
@@ -916,7 +916,7 @@ static int pcs_parse_pinconf(struct pcs_device *pcs, struct device_node *np,
/* If pinconf isn't supported, don't parse properties in below. */
if (!PCS_HAS_PINCONF)
- return 0;
+ return -ENOTSUPP;
/* cacluate how much properties are supported in current node */
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(prop2); i++) {
@@ -928,7 +928,7 @@ static int pcs_parse_pinconf(struct pcs_device *pcs, struct device_node *np,
nconfs++;
}
if (!nconfs)
- return 0;
+ return -ENOTSUPP;
func->conf = devm_kcalloc(pcs->dev,
nconfs, sizeof(struct pcs_conf_vals),
@@ -1056,9 +1056,12 @@ static int pcs_parse_one_pinctrl_entry(struct pcs_device *pcs,
if (PCS_HAS_PINCONF && function) {
res = pcs_parse_pinconf(pcs, np, function, map);
- if (res)
+ if (res == 0)
+ *num_maps = 2;
+ else if (res == -ENOTSUPP)
+ *num_maps = 1;
+ else
goto free_pingroups;
- *num_maps = 2;
} else {
*num_maps = 1;
}
--
2.25.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Drew Fustini <drew@beagleboard.org>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@linaro.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Cc: Jason Kridner <jkridner@beagleboard.org>,
Robert Nelson <robertcnelson@beagleboard.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] pinctrl-single: fix pcs_parse_pinconf() return value
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 14:51:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200608125143.GA2789203@x1> (raw)
This patch causes pcs_parse_pinconf() to return -ENOTSUPP when no
pinctrl_map is added. The current behavior is to return 0 when
!PCS_HAS_PINCONF or !nconfs. Thus pcs_parse_one_pinctrl_entry()
incorrectly assumes that a map was added and sets num_maps = 2.
Analysis:
=========
The function pcs_parse_one_pinctrl_entry() calls pcs_parse_pinconf()
if PCS_HAS_PINCONF is enabled. The function pcs_parse_pinconf()
returns 0 to indicate there was no error and num_maps is then set to 2:
980 static int pcs_parse_one_pinctrl_entry(struct pcs_device *pcs,
981 struct device_node *np,
982 struct pinctrl_map **map,
983 unsigned *num_maps,
984 const char **pgnames)
985 {
<snip>
1053 (*map)->type = PIN_MAP_TYPE_MUX_GROUP;
1054 (*map)->data.mux.group = np->name;
1055 (*map)->data.mux.function = np->name;
1056
1057 if (PCS_HAS_PINCONF && function) {
1058 res = pcs_parse_pinconf(pcs, np, function, map);
1059 if (res)
1060 goto free_pingroups;
1061 *num_maps = 2;
1062 } else {
1063 *num_maps = 1;
1064 }
However, pcs_parse_pinconf() will also return 0 if !PCS_HAS_PINCONF or
!nconfs. I believe these conditions should indicate that no map was
added by returning -ENOTSUPP. Otherwise pcs_parse_one_pinctrl_entry()
will set num_maps = 2 even though no maps were successfully added, as
it does not reach "m++" on line 940:
895 static int pcs_parse_pinconf(struct pcs_device *pcs, struct device_node *np,
896 struct pcs_function *func,
897 struct pinctrl_map **map)
898
899 {
900 struct pinctrl_map *m = *map;
<snip>
917 /* If pinconf isn't supported, don't parse properties in below. */
918 if (!PCS_HAS_PINCONF)
919 return 0;
920
921 /* cacluate how much properties are supported in current node */
922 for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(prop2); i++) {
923 if (of_find_property(np, prop2[i].name, NULL))
924 nconfs++;
925 }
926 for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(prop4); i++) {
927 if (of_find_property(np, prop4[i].name, NULL))
928 nconfs++;
929 }
930 if (!nconfs)
919 return 0;
932
933 func->conf = devm_kcalloc(pcs->dev,
934 nconfs, sizeof(struct pcs_conf_vals),
935 GFP_KERNEL);
936 if (!func->conf)
937 return -ENOMEM;
938 func->nconfs = nconfs;
939 conf = &(func->conf[0]);
940 m++;
This situtation will cause a boot failure [0] on the BeagleBone Black
(AM3358) when am33xx_pinmux node in arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx-l4.dtsi
has compatible = "pinconf-single" instead of "pinctrl-single".
The patch fixes this issue by returning -ENOSUPP when !PCS_HAS_PINCONF
or !nconfs, so that pcs_parse_one_pinctrl_entry() will know that no
map was added.
Logic is also added to pcs_parse_one_pinctrl_entry() to distinguish
between -ENOSUPP and other errors. In the case of -ENOSUPP, num_maps
is set to 1 as it is valid for pinconf to be enabled and a given pin
group to not any pinconf properties.
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-omap/20200529175544.GA3766151@x1/
Fixes: 9dddb4df90d1 ("pinctrl: single: support generic pinconf")
Signed-off-by: Drew Fustini <drew@beagleboard.org>
---
changes from V1 [0]:
- if pcs_parse_pinconf() returns -ENOSUPP, then set num_maps to 1 and
proceed normally as it is valid for group to have no pinconf props
- added Fixes: tag thanks to Gustavo A. R. Silva
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-omap/20200531204147.GA664833@x1/
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c | 11 +++++++----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
index 1e0614daee9b..a9d511982780 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
@@ -916,7 +916,7 @@ static int pcs_parse_pinconf(struct pcs_device *pcs, struct device_node *np,
/* If pinconf isn't supported, don't parse properties in below. */
if (!PCS_HAS_PINCONF)
- return 0;
+ return -ENOTSUPP;
/* cacluate how much properties are supported in current node */
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(prop2); i++) {
@@ -928,7 +928,7 @@ static int pcs_parse_pinconf(struct pcs_device *pcs, struct device_node *np,
nconfs++;
}
if (!nconfs)
- return 0;
+ return -ENOTSUPP;
func->conf = devm_kcalloc(pcs->dev,
nconfs, sizeof(struct pcs_conf_vals),
@@ -1056,9 +1056,12 @@ static int pcs_parse_one_pinctrl_entry(struct pcs_device *pcs,
if (PCS_HAS_PINCONF && function) {
res = pcs_parse_pinconf(pcs, np, function, map);
- if (res)
+ if (res == 0)
+ *num_maps = 2;
+ else if (res == -ENOTSUPP)
+ *num_maps = 1;
+ else
goto free_pingroups;
- *num_maps = 2;
} else {
*num_maps = 1;
}
--
2.25.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next reply other threads:[~2020-06-08 12:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-08 12:51 Drew Fustini [this message]
2020-06-08 12:51 ` [PATCH v2] pinctrl-single: fix pcs_parse_pinconf() return value Drew Fustini
2020-06-09 18:06 ` Tony Lindgren
2020-06-09 18:06 ` Tony Lindgren
2020-06-16 8:31 ` Linus Walleij
2020-06-16 8:31 ` Linus Walleij
2020-06-16 11:59 ` Drew Fustini
2020-06-16 11:59 ` Drew Fustini
2020-06-26 19:19 ` Drew Fustini
2020-06-26 19:19 ` Drew Fustini
2020-07-05 8:58 ` Haojian Zhuang
2020-07-05 8:58 ` Haojian Zhuang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200608125143.GA2789203@x1 \
--to=drew@beagleboard.org \
--cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
--cc=haojian.zhuang@linaro.org \
--cc=jkridner@beagleboard.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robertcnelson@beagleboard.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.