All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Cc: "Andy Shevchenko" <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
	"Ranjani Sridharan" <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>,
	david.m.ertman@intel.com, shiraz.saleem@intel.com,
	"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
	"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org,
	"linux-arm Mailing List" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	"Bartosz Golaszewski" <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
	"Jean Delvare" <jdelvare@suse.com>,
	"Guenter Roeck" <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
	"Wim Van Sebroeck" <wim@linux-watchdog.org>,
	"Shawn Guo" <shawnguo@kernel.org>, "Li Yang" <leoyang.li@nxp.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Jason Cooper" <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
	"Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/11] mfd: Add support for Kontron sl28cpld management controller
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 19:30:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200610183053.GV4106@dell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b06a79c845e0ab251235d30f7dc94dd5@walle.cc>

On Wed, 10 Jun 2020, Michael Walle wrote:

> Am 2020-06-10 09:56, schrieb Lee Jones:
> > On Wed, 10 Jun 2020, Michael Walle wrote:
> > 
> > > Am 2020-06-10 09:19, schrieb Lee Jones:
> > > > On Wed, 10 Jun 2020, Michael Walle wrote:
> > > > > Am 2020-06-09 21:45, schrieb Lee Jones:
> > > > > > On Tue, 09 Jun 2020, Michael Walle wrote:
> > > > > > > > We do not need a 'simple-regmap' solution for your use-case.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Since your device's registers are segregated, just split up the
> > > > > > > > register map and allocate each sub-device with it's own slice.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I don't get it, could you make a device tree example for my
> > > > > > > use-case? (see also above)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >     &i2cbus {
> > > > > >         mfd-device@10 {
> > > > > >             compatible = "simple-mfd";
> > > > > >             reg = <10>;
> > > > > >
> > > > > >             sub-device@10 {
> > > > > >                 compatible = "vendor,sub-device";
> > > > > >                 reg = <10>;
> > > > > >             };
> > > > > >    };
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Regmap config would be present in each of the child devices.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Each child device would call devm_regmap_init_i2c() in .probe().
> > > > >
> > > > > Ah, I see. If I'm not wrong, this still means to create an i2c
> > > > > device driver with the name "simple-mfd".
> > > >
> > > > Yes, it does.
> > > >
> > > > > Besides that, I don't like this, because:
> > > > >  - Rob already expressed its concerns with "simple-mfd" and so on.
> > > >
> > > > Where did this take place?  I'd like to read up on this.
> > > 
> > > In this thread:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20200604211039.12689-1-michael@walle.cc/T/#m16fdba5962069e7cd4aa817582ee358c9fe2ecbf
> > > 
> > > >
> > > > >  - you need to duplicate the config in each sub device
> > > >
> > > > You can have a share a single config.
> > > >
> > > > >  - which also means you are restricting the sub devices to be
> > > > >    i2c only (unless you implement and duplicate other regmap configs,
> > > > >    too). For this driver, SPI and MMIO may be viable options.
> > > >
> > > > You could also have a shared implementation to choose between different
> > > > busses.
> > > 
> > > Then what is the difference between to have this shared config in the
> > > parent driver only and use the functions which are already there, i.e.
> > > dev_get_regmap(parent). But see, below, I'll wait with what you're
> > > coming up.
> > 
> > The difference is the omission of an otherwise pointless/superfluous
> > driver.  Actually, it's the difference between the omission of 10
> > pointless drivers!
> 
> If you want to omit anything generic in the device tree - and as far as
> I understand it - that should be the way to go, the specific compatible
> string of the parent device has to go somewhere. Thus I'd appreciate
> a consolidated (MFD) driver which holds all these, as you say it
> pointless drivers.
> Because IMHO they are not pointless, rather they are
> the actual drivers for the MFD. Its sub nodes are just an implementation
> detail to be able to use the OF bindings
> (like your clock example or
> a phandle to a PWM controller). Just because it is almost nothing there
> except the regmap instantiation doesn't mean it is not a valid MFD driver.

A valid MFD driver is whatever we (the Linux community at large)
define it to be.  An MFD is not a real thing.  We made it up.  It's
MFD which is the implementation detail, not the child devices.  If a
driver a) does very little, and b) the very little it does do can be
resolved in a different way, is not a valid driver.  It's a waste of
disk space.

> And there is also additional stuff, like clock enable, version checks, etc.

As more functionality is added *then* we can justify a driver.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
	Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>,
	david.m.ertman@intel.com, shiraz.saleem@intel.com,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
	Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Uwe
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/11] mfd: Add support for Kontron sl28cpld management controller
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 19:30:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200610183053.GV4106@dell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b06a79c845e0ab251235d30f7dc94dd5@walle.cc>

On Wed, 10 Jun 2020, Michael Walle wrote:

> Am 2020-06-10 09:56, schrieb Lee Jones:
> > On Wed, 10 Jun 2020, Michael Walle wrote:
> > 
> > > Am 2020-06-10 09:19, schrieb Lee Jones:
> > > > On Wed, 10 Jun 2020, Michael Walle wrote:
> > > > > Am 2020-06-09 21:45, schrieb Lee Jones:
> > > > > > On Tue, 09 Jun 2020, Michael Walle wrote:
> > > > > > > > We do not need a 'simple-regmap' solution for your use-case.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Since your device's registers are segregated, just split up the
> > > > > > > > register map and allocate each sub-device with it's own slice.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I don't get it, could you make a device tree example for my
> > > > > > > use-case? (see also above)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >     &i2cbus {
> > > > > >         mfd-device@10 {
> > > > > >             compatible = "simple-mfd";
> > > > > >             reg = <10>;
> > > > > >
> > > > > >             sub-device@10 {
> > > > > >                 compatible = "vendor,sub-device";
> > > > > >                 reg = <10>;
> > > > > >             };
> > > > > >    };
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Regmap config would be present in each of the child devices.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Each child device would call devm_regmap_init_i2c() in .probe().
> > > > >
> > > > > Ah, I see. If I'm not wrong, this still means to create an i2c
> > > > > device driver with the name "simple-mfd".
> > > >
> > > > Yes, it does.
> > > >
> > > > > Besides that, I don't like this, because:
> > > > >  - Rob already expressed its concerns with "simple-mfd" and so on.
> > > >
> > > > Where did this take place?  I'd like to read up on this.
> > > 
> > > In this thread:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20200604211039.12689-1-michael@walle.cc/T/#m16fdba5962069e7cd4aa817582ee358c9fe2ecbf
> > > 
> > > >
> > > > >  - you need to duplicate the config in each sub device
> > > >
> > > > You can have a share a single config.
> > > >
> > > > >  - which also means you are restricting the sub devices to be
> > > > >    i2c only (unless you implement and duplicate other regmap configs,
> > > > >    too). For this driver, SPI and MMIO may be viable options.
> > > >
> > > > You could also have a shared implementation to choose between different
> > > > busses.
> > > 
> > > Then what is the difference between to have this shared config in the
> > > parent driver only and use the functions which are already there, i.e.
> > > dev_get_regmap(parent). But see, below, I'll wait with what you're
> > > coming up.
> > 
> > The difference is the omission of an otherwise pointless/superfluous
> > driver.  Actually, it's the difference between the omission of 10
> > pointless drivers!
> 
> If you want to omit anything generic in the device tree - and as far as
> I understand it - that should be the way to go, the specific compatible
> string of the parent device has to go somewhere. Thus I'd appreciate
> a consolidated (MFD) driver which holds all these, as you say it
> pointless drivers.
> Because IMHO they are not pointless, rather they are
> the actual drivers for the MFD. Its sub nodes are just an implementation
> detail to be able to use the OF bindings
> (like your clock example or
> a phandle to a PWM controller). Just because it is almost nothing there
> except the regmap instantiation doesn't mean it is not a valid MFD driver.

A valid MFD driver is whatever we (the Linux community at large)
define it to be.  An MFD is not a real thing.  We made it up.  It's
MFD which is the implementation detail, not the child devices.  If a
driver a) does very little, and b) the very little it does do can be
resolved in a different way, is not a valid driver.  It's a waste of
disk space.

> And there is also additional stuff, like clock enable, version checks, etc.

As more functionality is added *then* we can justify a driver.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
	"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	"Jason Cooper" <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	"Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>,
	"Ranjani Sridharan" <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>,
	"Bartosz Golaszewski" <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
	"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
	david.m.ertman@intel.com, "Guenter Roeck" <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Jean Delvare" <jdelvare@suse.com>,
	linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org,
	"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Wim Van Sebroeck" <wim@linux-watchdog.org>,
	shiraz.saleem@intel.com,
	"linux-arm Mailing List" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Li Yang" <leoyang.li@nxp.com>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Shawn Guo" <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/11] mfd: Add support for Kontron sl28cpld management controller
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 19:30:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200610183053.GV4106@dell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b06a79c845e0ab251235d30f7dc94dd5@walle.cc>

On Wed, 10 Jun 2020, Michael Walle wrote:

> Am 2020-06-10 09:56, schrieb Lee Jones:
> > On Wed, 10 Jun 2020, Michael Walle wrote:
> > 
> > > Am 2020-06-10 09:19, schrieb Lee Jones:
> > > > On Wed, 10 Jun 2020, Michael Walle wrote:
> > > > > Am 2020-06-09 21:45, schrieb Lee Jones:
> > > > > > On Tue, 09 Jun 2020, Michael Walle wrote:
> > > > > > > > We do not need a 'simple-regmap' solution for your use-case.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Since your device's registers are segregated, just split up the
> > > > > > > > register map and allocate each sub-device with it's own slice.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I don't get it, could you make a device tree example for my
> > > > > > > use-case? (see also above)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >     &i2cbus {
> > > > > >         mfd-device@10 {
> > > > > >             compatible = "simple-mfd";
> > > > > >             reg = <10>;
> > > > > >
> > > > > >             sub-device@10 {
> > > > > >                 compatible = "vendor,sub-device";
> > > > > >                 reg = <10>;
> > > > > >             };
> > > > > >    };
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Regmap config would be present in each of the child devices.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Each child device would call devm_regmap_init_i2c() in .probe().
> > > > >
> > > > > Ah, I see. If I'm not wrong, this still means to create an i2c
> > > > > device driver with the name "simple-mfd".
> > > >
> > > > Yes, it does.
> > > >
> > > > > Besides that, I don't like this, because:
> > > > >  - Rob already expressed its concerns with "simple-mfd" and so on.
> > > >
> > > > Where did this take place?  I'd like to read up on this.
> > > 
> > > In this thread:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20200604211039.12689-1-michael@walle.cc/T/#m16fdba5962069e7cd4aa817582ee358c9fe2ecbf
> > > 
> > > >
> > > > >  - you need to duplicate the config in each sub device
> > > >
> > > > You can have a share a single config.
> > > >
> > > > >  - which also means you are restricting the sub devices to be
> > > > >    i2c only (unless you implement and duplicate other regmap configs,
> > > > >    too). For this driver, SPI and MMIO may be viable options.
> > > >
> > > > You could also have a shared implementation to choose between different
> > > > busses.
> > > 
> > > Then what is the difference between to have this shared config in the
> > > parent driver only and use the functions which are already there, i.e.
> > > dev_get_regmap(parent). But see, below, I'll wait with what you're
> > > coming up.
> > 
> > The difference is the omission of an otherwise pointless/superfluous
> > driver.  Actually, it's the difference between the omission of 10
> > pointless drivers!
> 
> If you want to omit anything generic in the device tree - and as far as
> I understand it - that should be the way to go, the specific compatible
> string of the parent device has to go somewhere. Thus I'd appreciate
> a consolidated (MFD) driver which holds all these, as you say it
> pointless drivers.
> Because IMHO they are not pointless, rather they are
> the actual drivers for the MFD. Its sub nodes are just an implementation
> detail to be able to use the OF bindings
> (like your clock example or
> a phandle to a PWM controller). Just because it is almost nothing there
> except the regmap instantiation doesn't mean it is not a valid MFD driver.

A valid MFD driver is whatever we (the Linux community at large)
define it to be.  An MFD is not a real thing.  We made it up.  It's
MFD which is the implementation detail, not the child devices.  If a
driver a) does very little, and b) the very little it does do can be
resolved in a different way, is not a valid driver.  It's a waste of
disk space.

> And there is also additional stuff, like clock enable, version checks, etc.

As more functionality is added *then* we can justify a driver.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-10 18:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 214+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-04 21:10 [PATCH v4 00/11] Add support for Kontron sl28cpld Michael Walle
2020-06-04 21:10 ` Michael Walle
2020-06-04 21:10 ` Michael Walle
2020-06-04 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 01/11] dt-bindings: mfd: Add bindings for sl28cpld Michael Walle
2020-06-04 21:10   ` Michael Walle
2020-06-09 16:28   ` Rob Herring
2020-06-09 16:28     ` Rob Herring
2020-06-09 16:28     ` Rob Herring
2020-06-04 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 02/11] mfd: Add support for Kontron sl28cpld management controller Michael Walle
2020-06-04 21:10   ` Michael Walle
2020-06-04 21:10   ` Michael Walle
2020-06-05  6:57   ` Lee Jones
2020-06-05  6:57     ` Lee Jones
2020-06-05  6:57     ` Lee Jones
2020-06-05  9:51     ` Michael Walle
2020-06-05  9:51       ` Michael Walle
2020-06-05  9:51       ` Michael Walle
2020-06-05 10:50     ` Mark Brown
2020-06-05 10:50       ` Mark Brown
2020-06-05 20:07       ` Michael Walle
2020-06-05 20:07         ` Michael Walle
2020-06-05 20:07         ` Michael Walle
2020-06-06 11:46         ` Mark Brown
2020-06-06 11:46           ` Mark Brown
2020-06-06 12:45           ` Michael Walle
2020-06-06 12:45             ` Michael Walle
2020-06-06 12:45             ` Michael Walle
2020-06-08  8:28             ` Lee Jones
2020-06-08  8:28               ` Lee Jones
2020-06-08  8:28               ` Lee Jones
2020-06-08 10:02               ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-08 10:02                 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-08 10:02                 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-08 15:41                 ` Michael Walle
2020-06-08 15:41                   ` Michael Walle
2020-06-08 15:41                   ` Michael Walle
2020-06-08 18:56                   ` Lee Jones
2020-06-08 18:56                     ` Lee Jones
2020-06-08 18:56                     ` Lee Jones
2020-06-08 21:09                     ` Michael Walle
2020-06-08 21:09                       ` Michael Walle
2020-06-08 21:09                       ` Michael Walle
2020-06-09  6:47                       ` Lee Jones
2020-06-09  6:47                         ` Lee Jones
2020-06-09  6:47                         ` Lee Jones
2020-06-09 14:38                         ` Michael Walle
2020-06-09 14:38                           ` Michael Walle
2020-06-09 14:38                           ` Michael Walle
2020-06-09 14:42                           ` Mark Brown
2020-06-09 14:42                             ` Mark Brown
2020-06-09 14:42                             ` Mark Brown
2020-06-09 15:01                             ` Michael Walle
2020-06-09 15:01                               ` Michael Walle
2020-06-09 15:01                               ` Michael Walle
2020-06-09 17:15                               ` Rob Herring
2020-06-09 17:15                                 ` Rob Herring
2020-06-09 17:15                                 ` Rob Herring
2020-06-09 17:29                                 ` Mark Brown
2020-06-09 17:29                                   ` Mark Brown
2020-06-09 17:29                                   ` Mark Brown
2020-06-09 18:41                                 ` Lee Jones
2020-06-09 18:41                                   ` Lee Jones
2020-06-09 18:41                                   ` Lee Jones
2020-06-09 15:19                           ` Lee Jones
2020-06-09 15:19                             ` Lee Jones
2020-06-09 15:19                             ` Lee Jones
2020-06-09 15:30                             ` Michael Walle
2020-06-09 15:30                               ` Michael Walle
2020-06-09 15:30                               ` Michael Walle
2020-06-09 19:45                               ` Lee Jones
2020-06-09 19:45                                 ` Lee Jones
2020-06-09 19:45                                 ` Lee Jones
2020-06-10  7:10                                 ` Michael Walle
2020-06-10  7:10                                   ` Michael Walle
2020-06-10  7:10                                   ` Michael Walle
2020-06-10  7:19                                   ` Lee Jones
2020-06-10  7:19                                     ` Lee Jones
2020-06-10  7:19                                     ` Lee Jones
2020-06-10  7:49                                     ` Michael Walle
2020-06-10  7:49                                       ` Michael Walle
2020-06-10  7:49                                       ` Michael Walle
2020-06-10  7:56                                       ` Lee Jones
2020-06-10  7:56                                         ` Lee Jones
2020-06-10  7:56                                         ` Lee Jones
2020-06-10  9:27                                         ` Michael Walle
2020-06-10  9:27                                           ` Michael Walle
2020-06-10  9:27                                           ` Michael Walle
2020-06-10 18:30                                           ` Lee Jones [this message]
2020-06-10 18:30                                             ` Lee Jones
2020-06-10 18:30                                             ` Lee Jones
2020-06-10 17:16                                     ` Rob Herring
2020-06-10 17:16                                       ` Rob Herring
2020-06-10 17:16                                       ` Rob Herring
2020-06-10 18:02                                       ` Lee Jones
2020-06-10 18:02                                         ` Lee Jones
2020-06-10 18:02                                         ` Lee Jones
2020-06-08 18:20                 ` Lee Jones
2020-06-08 18:20                   ` Lee Jones
2020-06-08 18:20                   ` Lee Jones
2020-06-09 16:54               ` Rob Herring
2020-06-09 16:54                 ` Rob Herring
2020-06-09 16:54                 ` Rob Herring
2020-06-09 18:52                 ` Lee Jones
2020-06-09 18:52                   ` Lee Jones
2020-06-09 18:52                   ` Lee Jones
2020-06-05  8:01   ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-05  8:01     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-05  8:01     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-05  8:02     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-05  8:02       ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-05  8:02       ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-05 10:09     ` Michael Walle
2020-06-05 10:09       ` Michael Walle
2020-06-05 10:09       ` Michael Walle
2020-06-05 10:48       ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-05 10:48         ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-05 10:48         ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-05 11:51         ` Michael Walle
2020-06-05 11:51           ` Michael Walle
2020-06-05 11:51           ` Michael Walle
2020-06-04 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 03/11] irqchip: add sl28cpld interrupt controller support Michael Walle
2020-06-04 21:10   ` Michael Walle
2020-06-05  1:26   ` kernel test robot
2020-06-05  1:26     ` kernel test robot
2020-06-05  1:26     ` kernel test robot
2020-06-05  8:07   ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-05  8:07     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-05  8:07     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-08 15:12   ` kernel test robot
2020-06-08 15:12     ` kernel test robot
2020-06-08 15:12     ` kernel test robot
2020-06-08 15:12     ` kernel test robot
2020-06-04 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 04/11] watchdog: add support for sl28cpld watchdog Michael Walle
2020-06-04 21:10   ` Michael Walle
2020-06-04 21:10   ` Michael Walle
2020-06-05  8:14   ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-05  8:14     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-05  8:14     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-05 10:24     ` Michael Walle
2020-06-05 10:24       ` Michael Walle
2020-06-05 10:24       ` Michael Walle
2020-06-05 10:50       ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-05 10:50         ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-05 10:50         ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-05 13:52         ` Guenter Roeck
2020-06-05 13:52           ` Guenter Roeck
2020-06-05 13:52           ` Guenter Roeck
2020-06-05 14:09           ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-05 14:09             ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-05 14:09             ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-05 15:05             ` Guenter Roeck
2020-06-05 15:05               ` Guenter Roeck
2020-06-05 15:05               ` Guenter Roeck
2020-06-05 16:04               ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-05 16:04                 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-05 16:04                 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-05 16:34                 ` Guenter Roeck
2020-06-05 16:34                   ` Guenter Roeck
2020-06-05 16:34                   ` Guenter Roeck
2020-06-04 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 05/11] pwm: add support for sl28cpld PWM controller Michael Walle
2020-06-04 21:10   ` Michael Walle
2020-06-04 21:10   ` Michael Walle
2020-06-05  8:15   ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-05  8:15     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-05  8:15     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-05  8:49   ` Lee Jones
2020-06-05  8:49     ` Lee Jones
2020-06-05  8:49     ` Lee Jones
2020-06-05  9:33     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-05  9:33       ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-05  9:33       ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-05 11:39     ` Michael Walle
2020-06-05 11:39       ` Michael Walle
2020-06-05 11:39       ` Michael Walle
2020-06-05 18:17     ` Michael Walle
2020-06-05 18:17       ` Michael Walle
2020-06-05 18:17       ` Michael Walle
2020-06-08  7:46       ` Lee Jones
2020-06-08  7:46         ` Lee Jones
2020-06-08  7:46         ` Lee Jones
2020-06-04 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 06/11] gpio: add support for the sl28cpld GPIO controller Michael Walle
2020-06-04 21:10   ` Michael Walle
2020-06-05 12:00   ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-05 12:00     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-05 12:00     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-05 12:42     ` Michael Walle
2020-06-05 12:42       ` Michael Walle
2020-06-05 12:42       ` Michael Walle
2020-06-05 13:15       ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-05 13:15         ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-05 13:15         ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-05 18:44         ` Michael Walle
2020-06-05 18:44           ` Michael Walle
2020-06-05 18:44           ` Michael Walle
2020-06-05 21:19           ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-05 21:19             ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-05 21:19             ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-04 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 07/11] hwmon: add support for the sl28cpld hardware monitoring controller Michael Walle
2020-06-04 21:10   ` Michael Walle
2020-06-04 21:10   ` Michael Walle
2020-06-05 12:06   ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-05 12:06     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-05 12:06     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-04 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 08/11] arm64: dts: freescale: sl28: enable sl28cpld Michael Walle
2020-06-04 21:10   ` Michael Walle
2020-06-04 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 09/11] arm64: dts: freescale: sl28: map GPIOs to input events Michael Walle
2020-06-04 21:10   ` Michael Walle
2020-06-04 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 10/11] arm64: dts: freescale: sl28: enable LED support Michael Walle
2020-06-04 21:10   ` Michael Walle
2020-06-04 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 11/11] arm64: dts: freescale: sl28: enable fan support Michael Walle
2020-06-04 21:10   ` Michael Walle
2020-06-05  6:13 ` [PATCH v4 00/11] Add support for Kontron sl28cpld Lee Jones
2020-06-05  6:13   ` Lee Jones
2020-06-05  6:13   ` Lee Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200610183053.GV4106@dell \
    --to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=david.m.ertman@intel.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
    --cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
    --cc=leoyang.li@nxp.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=michael@walle.cc \
    --cc=ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    --cc=shiraz.saleem@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=wim@linux-watchdog.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.