From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH? v2] powerpc: Hard wire PT_SOFTE value to 1 in gpr_get() too
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 12:58:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200611105830.GB12500@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <321e6865-1762-c459-56c4-0cc89c7c2a7e@linux.ibm.com>
On 06/11, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
>
>
> On 6/10/20 8:37 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >looks like this patch was forgotten.
>
> yep, I missed this. But mpe did have comments for the patch.
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/9/19/107
Yes, and I thought that I have replied... apparently not, sorry!
So let me repeat, I am fine either way, I do not understand this
ppc-specific code and I can't really test this change.
Let me quote that email from Michael:
> We could do it like below. I'm 50/50 though on whether it's worth it, or
> if we should just go with the big ifdef like in your patch.
up to you ;)
Hmm. And yes,
> >>This is not consistent and this breaks
> >>http://sourceware.org/systemtap/wiki/utrace/tests/user-regs-peekpoke
this is 404.
Jan, could correct the link above?
Oleg.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH? v2] powerpc: Hard wire PT_SOFTE value to 1 in gpr_get() too
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 12:58:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200611105830.GB12500@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <321e6865-1762-c459-56c4-0cc89c7c2a7e@linux.ibm.com>
On 06/11, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
>
>
> On 6/10/20 8:37 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >looks like this patch was forgotten.
>
> yep, I missed this. But mpe did have comments for the patch.
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/9/19/107
Yes, and I thought that I have replied... apparently not, sorry!
So let me repeat, I am fine either way, I do not understand this
ppc-specific code and I can't really test this change.
Let me quote that email from Michael:
> We could do it like below. I'm 50/50 though on whether it's worth it, or
> if we should just go with the big ifdef like in your patch.
up to you ;)
Hmm. And yes,
> >>This is not consistent and this breaks
> >>http://sourceware.org/systemtap/wiki/utrace/tests/user-regs-peekpoke
this is 404.
Jan, could correct the link above?
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-11 11:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-17 12:12 [PATCH?] powerpc: Hard wire PT_SOFTE value to 1 in gpr_get() too Oleg Nesterov
2019-09-17 12:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-09-17 14:09 ` kbuild test robot
2019-09-17 14:09 ` kbuild test robot
2019-09-17 14:37 ` [PATCH? v2] " Oleg Nesterov
2019-09-17 14:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2020-06-10 15:07 ` Oleg Nesterov
2020-06-10 15:07 ` Oleg Nesterov
2020-06-11 8:52 ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2020-06-11 8:52 ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2020-06-11 10:58 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2020-06-11 10:58 ` Oleg Nesterov
2020-06-11 11:11 ` Jan Kratochvil
2020-06-11 11:11 ` Jan Kratochvil
2019-09-19 7:52 ` [PATCH?] " Michael Ellerman
2019-09-19 7:52 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200611105830.GB12500@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.