All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Jason Yan <yanaijie@huawei.com>
Cc: jaegeuk@kernel.org, chao@kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: Eliminate usage of uninitialized_var() macro
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 13:11:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202006151311.138CD1D@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200615085132.166470-1-yanaijie@huawei.com>

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 04:51:32PM +0800, Jason Yan wrote:
> This is an effort to eliminate the uninitialized_var() macro[1].
> 
> The use of this macro is the wrong solution because it forces off ANY
> analysis by the compiler for a given variable. It even masks "unused
> variable" warnings.
> 
> Quoted from Linus[2]:
> 
> "It's a horrible thing to use, in that it adds extra cruft to the
> source code, and then shuts up a compiler warning (even the _reliable_
> warnings from gcc)."
> 
> Fix it by remove this variable since it is not needed at all.
> 
> [1] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/81
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFz2500WfbKXAx8s67wrm9=yVJu65TpLgN_ybYNv0VEOKA@mail.gmail.com/
> 
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Suggested-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Yan <yanaijie@huawei.com>
> ---
>  v2: Directly remove this variable.

Thanks! I've applied this to my uninitialized_var() macro removal
series.

-- 
Kees Cook

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Jason Yan <yanaijie@huawei.com>
Cc: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, jaegeuk@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: Eliminate usage of uninitialized_var() macro
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 13:11:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202006151311.138CD1D@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200615085132.166470-1-yanaijie@huawei.com>

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 04:51:32PM +0800, Jason Yan wrote:
> This is an effort to eliminate the uninitialized_var() macro[1].
> 
> The use of this macro is the wrong solution because it forces off ANY
> analysis by the compiler for a given variable. It even masks "unused
> variable" warnings.
> 
> Quoted from Linus[2]:
> 
> "It's a horrible thing to use, in that it adds extra cruft to the
> source code, and then shuts up a compiler warning (even the _reliable_
> warnings from gcc)."
> 
> Fix it by remove this variable since it is not needed at all.
> 
> [1] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/81
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFz2500WfbKXAx8s67wrm9=yVJu65TpLgN_ybYNv0VEOKA@mail.gmail.com/
> 
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Suggested-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Yan <yanaijie@huawei.com>
> ---
>  v2: Directly remove this variable.

Thanks! I've applied this to my uninitialized_var() macro removal
series.

-- 
Kees Cook


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-06-15 20:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-15  8:51 [PATCH] f2fs: Eliminate usage of uninitialized_var() macro Jason Yan
2020-06-15  8:51 ` [f2fs-dev] " Jason Yan
2020-06-15  9:04 ` Chao Yu
2020-06-15  9:04   ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2020-06-15 20:11 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2020-06-15 20:11   ` Kees Cook
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-06-15  4:02 Jason Yan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202006151311.138CD1D@keescook \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yanaijie@huawei.com \
    --cc=yuchao0@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.