From: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, rafael@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de,
mpe@ellerman.id.au, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org,
mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@android.com, tkjos@google.com,
adharmap@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: Specify default governor on command line
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 10:48:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200616094802.GA139416@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200616092759.rjnk3lef4tedfust@vireshk-i7>
On Tuesday 16 Jun 2020 at 14:57:59 (+0530), Viresh Kumar wrote:
> There is another problem here which we need to look at. Any governor
> which is built as a module and isn't currently used, should be allowed
> to unload. And this needs to be tested by you as well, should be easy
> enough.
>
> With the current implementation, you take a reference to the default
> governor when the driver is registered and drop it only when the
> driver goes away. Which means we won't be able to unload the module of
> the governor even if it isn't used. Which is wrong. The solution I
> proposed had the same issue as well.
>
> You need to figure out a way where we don't need to keep holding the
> module hostage even when it isn't used. I see two ways at least for
> the same:
>
> - Do that from the existing place: cpufreq_init_policy().
>
> - And I think this can be done from governor-register/unregister as
> well.
>
> Second one sounds good, if it is feasible to do that.
Good point.
I'm thinking something along the lines of:
---8<---
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 0f05caedc320..a9219404e07f 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -2340,6 +2340,11 @@ int cpufreq_register_governor(struct cpufreq_governor *governor)
list_add(&governor->governor_list, &cpufreq_governor_list);
}
+ if (!strncasecmp(cpufreq_param_governor, governor->name, CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN))
+ default_governor = governor;
+ else if (!default_governor && cpufreq_default_governor() == governor)
+ default_governor = cpufreq_default_governor();
+
mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_governor_mutex);
return err;
}
@@ -2368,6 +2373,8 @@ void cpufreq_unregister_governor(struct cpufreq_governor *governor)
mutex_lock(&cpufreq_governor_mutex);
list_del(&governor->governor_list);
+ if (governor == default_governor)
+ default_governor = cpufreq_default_governor();
mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_governor_mutex);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_unregister_governor);
--->8---
should do the trick. That removes the unnecessary reference count, and
feels like a good place to hook things -- that is how cpuidle does it
too IIRC.
I'll double check the locking/synchronization, but that shouldn't be too
bad (famous last words).
Cheers,
Quentin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: juri.lelli@redhat.com, kernel-team@android.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, arnd@arndb.de, rafael@kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, adharmap@codeaurora.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, paulus@samba.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, tkjos@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: Specify default governor on command line
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 10:48:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200616094802.GA139416@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200616092759.rjnk3lef4tedfust@vireshk-i7>
On Tuesday 16 Jun 2020 at 14:57:59 (+0530), Viresh Kumar wrote:
> There is another problem here which we need to look at. Any governor
> which is built as a module and isn't currently used, should be allowed
> to unload. And this needs to be tested by you as well, should be easy
> enough.
>
> With the current implementation, you take a reference to the default
> governor when the driver is registered and drop it only when the
> driver goes away. Which means we won't be able to unload the module of
> the governor even if it isn't used. Which is wrong. The solution I
> proposed had the same issue as well.
>
> You need to figure out a way where we don't need to keep holding the
> module hostage even when it isn't used. I see two ways at least for
> the same:
>
> - Do that from the existing place: cpufreq_init_policy().
>
> - And I think this can be done from governor-register/unregister as
> well.
>
> Second one sounds good, if it is feasible to do that.
Good point.
I'm thinking something along the lines of:
---8<---
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 0f05caedc320..a9219404e07f 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -2340,6 +2340,11 @@ int cpufreq_register_governor(struct cpufreq_governor *governor)
list_add(&governor->governor_list, &cpufreq_governor_list);
}
+ if (!strncasecmp(cpufreq_param_governor, governor->name, CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN))
+ default_governor = governor;
+ else if (!default_governor && cpufreq_default_governor() == governor)
+ default_governor = cpufreq_default_governor();
+
mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_governor_mutex);
return err;
}
@@ -2368,6 +2373,8 @@ void cpufreq_unregister_governor(struct cpufreq_governor *governor)
mutex_lock(&cpufreq_governor_mutex);
list_del(&governor->governor_list);
+ if (governor == default_governor)
+ default_governor = cpufreq_default_governor();
mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_governor_mutex);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_unregister_governor);
--->8---
should do the trick. That removes the unnecessary reference count, and
feels like a good place to hook things -- that is how cpuidle does it
too IIRC.
I'll double check the locking/synchronization, but that shouldn't be too
bad (famous last words).
Cheers,
Quentin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-16 9:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-15 16:55 [PATCH 0/2] cpufreq: Specify the default governor on command line Quentin Perret
2020-06-15 16:55 ` Quentin Perret
2020-06-15 16:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: Register governors at core_initcall Quentin Perret
2020-06-15 16:55 ` Quentin Perret
2020-06-16 4:28 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-06-16 4:28 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-06-16 8:31 ` Quentin Perret
2020-06-16 8:31 ` Quentin Perret
2020-06-15 16:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: Specify default governor on command line Quentin Perret
2020-06-15 16:55 ` Quentin Perret
2020-06-15 17:41 ` Quentin Perret
2020-06-15 17:41 ` Quentin Perret
2020-06-16 4:31 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-06-16 4:31 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-06-16 8:31 ` Quentin Perret
2020-06-16 8:31 ` Quentin Perret
2020-06-16 9:27 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-06-16 9:27 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-06-16 9:48 ` Quentin Perret [this message]
2020-06-16 9:48 ` Quentin Perret
2020-06-16 9:54 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-06-16 9:54 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-06-16 9:56 ` Quentin Perret
2020-06-16 9:56 ` Quentin Perret
2020-06-20 14:36 ` [cpufreq] d83f959b5e: aim7.jobs-per-min -30.2% regression kernel test robot
2020-06-20 14:36 ` kernel test robot
2020-06-22 0:54 ` [cpufreq] d83f959b5e: kmsg.cpufreq:cpufreq_online:Failed_to_initialize_policy_for_cpu:#(-#) kernel test robot
2020-06-22 0:54 ` kernel test robot
2020-06-22 0:54 ` kernel test robot
2020-06-23 9:25 ` Quentin Perret
2020-06-23 9:25 ` Quentin Perret
2020-06-23 9:25 ` Quentin Perret
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200616094802.GA139416@google.com \
--to=qperret@google.com \
--cc=adharmap@codeaurora.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tkjos@google.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.