All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>
Cc: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>,
	cocci@systeme.lip6.fr, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Cocci] [PATCH] coccinelle: misc: add array_size_dup script to detect missed overlow checks
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 12:52:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202006181249.8B826D9@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2006172051280.3083@hadrien>

On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 08:54:03PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> 
> 
> On Wed, 17 Jun 2020, Kees Cook wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 01:20:45PM +0300, Denis Efremov wrote:
> > > +@as@
> > > +expression E1, E2;
> > > +@@
> > > +
> > > +array_size(E1, E2)
> >
> > BTW, is there a way yet in Coccinelle to match a fully qualified (?)
> > identifier? For example, if I have two lines in C:
> >
> > A)
> > 	array_size(variable, 5);
> > B)
> > 	array_size(instance->member.size, 5);
> > C)
> > 	array_size(instance->member.size + 1, 5);
> > D)
> > 	array_size(function_call(variable), 5);
> >
> >
> > This matches A, B, C, and D:
> >
> > @@
> > expression ARG1;
> > expression ARG2;
> > @@
> >
> > array_size(ARG1, ARG2);
> >
> >
> > This matches only A:
> >
> > @@
> > identifier ARG1;
> > expression ARG2;
> > @@
> >
> > array_size(ARG1, ARG2);
> >
> >
> > How do I get something to match A and B but not C and D (i.e. I do not
> > want to match any operations, function calls, etc, only a variable,
> > which may be identified through dereference, array index, or struct
> > member access.)
> 
> \(i\|e.fld\|e->fld\)
> 
> would probably do what you want.  It will also match cases where e is a
> function/macr call, but that is unlikely.
> 
> If you want a single metavariable that contains the whole thing, you can
> have an expression metavariable E and then write:
> 
> \(\(i\|e.fld\|e->fld\) \& E\)

Can you give an example of how that would look for an @@ section?

The problem I have is that I don't know the depth or combination of such
metavariables. There are a lot of combinations:

a
	a.b
		a.b.c
			a.b.c.d
			a.b.c->d
		a.b->c
			a.b->c.d
			a.b->c->d
	a->b
		a->b.c
			a->b.c.d
			a->b.c->d
		a->b->c
			a->b->c.d
			a->b->c->d
...


-- 
Kees Cook
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>
Cc: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>,
	cocci@systeme.lip6.fr, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Cocci] [PATCH] coccinelle: misc: add array_size_dup script to detect missed overlow checks
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 12:52:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202006181249.8B826D9@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2006172051280.3083@hadrien>

On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 08:54:03PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> 
> 
> On Wed, 17 Jun 2020, Kees Cook wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 01:20:45PM +0300, Denis Efremov wrote:
> > > +@as@
> > > +expression E1, E2;
> > > +@@
> > > +
> > > +array_size(E1, E2)
> >
> > BTW, is there a way yet in Coccinelle to match a fully qualified (?)
> > identifier? For example, if I have two lines in C:
> >
> > A)
> > 	array_size(variable, 5);
> > B)
> > 	array_size(instance->member.size, 5);
> > C)
> > 	array_size(instance->member.size + 1, 5);
> > D)
> > 	array_size(function_call(variable), 5);
> >
> >
> > This matches A, B, C, and D:
> >
> > @@
> > expression ARG1;
> > expression ARG2;
> > @@
> >
> > array_size(ARG1, ARG2);
> >
> >
> > This matches only A:
> >
> > @@
> > identifier ARG1;
> > expression ARG2;
> > @@
> >
> > array_size(ARG1, ARG2);
> >
> >
> > How do I get something to match A and B but not C and D (i.e. I do not
> > want to match any operations, function calls, etc, only a variable,
> > which may be identified through dereference, array index, or struct
> > member access.)
> 
> \(i\|e.fld\|e->fld\)
> 
> would probably do what you want.  It will also match cases where e is a
> function/macr call, but that is unlikely.
> 
> If you want a single metavariable that contains the whole thing, you can
> have an expression metavariable E and then write:
> 
> \(\(i\|e.fld\|e->fld\) \& E\)

Can you give an example of how that would look for an @@ section?

The problem I have is that I don't know the depth or combination of such
metavariables. There are a lot of combinations:

a
	a.b
		a.b.c
			a.b.c.d
			a.b.c->d
		a.b->c
			a.b->c.d
			a.b->c->d
	a->b
		a->b.c
			a->b.c.d
			a->b.c->d
		a->b->c
			a->b->c.d
			a->b->c->d
...


-- 
Kees Cook

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-18 19:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-15 10:20 [Cocci] [PATCH] coccinelle: misc: add array_size_dup script to detect missed overlow checks Denis Efremov
2020-06-15 10:20 ` Denis Efremov
2020-06-15 18:23 ` [Cocci] " Kees Cook
2020-06-15 18:23   ` Kees Cook
2020-06-15 18:35   ` [Cocci] " Denis Efremov
2020-06-15 18:35     ` Denis Efremov
2020-06-15 18:46     ` [Cocci] " Gustavo A. R. Silva
2020-06-15 18:46       ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2020-06-17  9:32       ` Denis Efremov
2020-06-17  9:32         ` Denis Efremov
2020-06-17 10:55       ` Denis Efremov
2020-06-17 10:55         ` Denis Efremov
2020-06-17 20:08         ` Julia Lawall
2020-06-17 20:08           ` Julia Lawall
2020-06-17 20:15           ` Julia Lawall
2020-06-17 20:15             ` Julia Lawall
2020-06-17 18:15 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-17 18:15   ` Kees Cook
2020-06-17 18:54   ` [Cocci] " Julia Lawall
2020-06-17 18:54     ` Julia Lawall
2020-06-18 19:52     ` Kees Cook [this message]
2020-06-18 19:52       ` Kees Cook
2020-06-18 19:56       ` Julia Lawall
2020-06-18 19:56         ` Julia Lawall
2020-06-18 20:48         ` Kees Cook
2020-06-18 20:48           ` Kees Cook
2020-06-18 21:08           ` Julia Lawall
2020-06-18 21:08             ` Julia Lawall
2020-06-17 20:30 ` Julia Lawall
2020-06-17 20:30   ` Julia Lawall
2020-06-17 20:50   ` Denis Efremov
2020-06-17 20:50     ` Denis Efremov
2020-06-17 20:52     ` Julia Lawall
2020-06-17 20:52       ` Julia Lawall
2020-06-18 10:23 ` [Cocci] [PATCH v2] " Denis Efremov
2020-06-18 10:23   ` Denis Efremov
2020-06-19 13:13 ` [Cocci] [PATCH v3] coccinelle: misc: add array_size_dup script to detect missed overflow checks Denis Efremov
2020-06-19 13:13   ` Denis Efremov
2020-06-21 20:53   ` [Cocci] " Julia Lawall
2020-06-21 20:53     ` Julia Lawall
2020-06-21 20:56   ` Julia Lawall
2020-06-21 20:56     ` Julia Lawall
2020-06-22 12:12     ` Denis Efremov
2020-06-22 12:12       ` Denis Efremov
2020-06-22 12:16     ` Denis Efremov
2020-06-22 12:16       ` Denis Efremov
2020-06-22 12:19       ` Julia Lawall
2020-06-22 12:19         ` Julia Lawall
2020-06-22 22:10 ` [Cocci] [PATCH v4] " Denis Efremov
2020-06-22 22:10   ` Denis Efremov
2020-06-24 19:42   ` [Cocci] " Julia Lawall
2020-06-24 19:42     ` Julia Lawall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202006181249.8B826D9@keescook \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr \
    --cc=cocci@systeme.lip6.fr \
    --cc=julia.lawall@inria.fr \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.