From: Lina Iyer <ilina@codeaurora.org>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@st.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] cpuidle: psci: Fail cpuidle registration if set OSI mode failed
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 12:01:50 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200618180150.GK12942@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200615152054.6819-2-ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
On Mon, Jun 15 2020 at 09:21 -0600, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>Currently we allow the cpuidle driver registration to succeed, even if we
>failed to enable the OSI mode when the hierarchical DT layout is used. This
>means running in a degraded mode, by using the available idle states per
>CPU, while also preventing the domain idle states.
>
>Moving forward, this behaviour looks quite questionable to maintain, as
>complexity seems to grow around it, especially when trying to add support
>for deferred probe, for example.
>
>Therefore, let's make the cpuidle driver registration to fail in this
>situation, thus relying on the default architectural cpuidle backend for
>WFI to be used.
>
>Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
May be PATCH 3/5 should come before this change, but for this patch itself,
please consider -
Reviewed-by: Lina Iyer <ilina@codeaurora.org>
>---
> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c | 5 -----
> 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c
>index 423f03bbeb74..f07786aad673 100644
>--- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c
>+++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c
>@@ -26,7 +26,6 @@ struct psci_pd_provider {
> };
>
> static LIST_HEAD(psci_pd_providers);
>-static bool osi_mode_enabled __initdata;
>
> static int psci_pd_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *pd)
> {
>@@ -272,7 +271,6 @@ static int __init psci_idle_init_domains(void)
> goto remove_pd;
> }
>
>- osi_mode_enabled = true;
> of_node_put(np);
> pr_info("Initialized CPU PM domain topology\n");
> return pd_count;
>@@ -293,9 +291,6 @@ struct device __init *psci_dt_attach_cpu(int cpu)
> {
> struct device *dev;
>
>- if (!osi_mode_enabled)
>- return NULL;
>-
> dev = dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name(get_cpu_device(cpu), "psci");
> if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev))
> return dev;
>--
>2.20.1
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lina Iyer <ilina@codeaurora.org>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@st.com>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] cpuidle: psci: Fail cpuidle registration if set OSI mode failed
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 12:01:50 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200618180150.GK12942@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200615152054.6819-2-ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
On Mon, Jun 15 2020 at 09:21 -0600, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>Currently we allow the cpuidle driver registration to succeed, even if we
>failed to enable the OSI mode when the hierarchical DT layout is used. This
>means running in a degraded mode, by using the available idle states per
>CPU, while also preventing the domain idle states.
>
>Moving forward, this behaviour looks quite questionable to maintain, as
>complexity seems to grow around it, especially when trying to add support
>for deferred probe, for example.
>
>Therefore, let's make the cpuidle driver registration to fail in this
>situation, thus relying on the default architectural cpuidle backend for
>WFI to be used.
>
>Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
May be PATCH 3/5 should come before this change, but for this patch itself,
please consider -
Reviewed-by: Lina Iyer <ilina@codeaurora.org>
>---
> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c | 5 -----
> 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c
>index 423f03bbeb74..f07786aad673 100644
>--- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c
>+++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c
>@@ -26,7 +26,6 @@ struct psci_pd_provider {
> };
>
> static LIST_HEAD(psci_pd_providers);
>-static bool osi_mode_enabled __initdata;
>
> static int psci_pd_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *pd)
> {
>@@ -272,7 +271,6 @@ static int __init psci_idle_init_domains(void)
> goto remove_pd;
> }
>
>- osi_mode_enabled = true;
> of_node_put(np);
> pr_info("Initialized CPU PM domain topology\n");
> return pd_count;
>@@ -293,9 +291,6 @@ struct device __init *psci_dt_attach_cpu(int cpu)
> {
> struct device *dev;
>
>- if (!osi_mode_enabled)
>- return NULL;
>-
> dev = dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name(get_cpu_device(cpu), "psci");
> if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev))
> return dev;
>--
>2.20.1
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-18 18:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-15 15:20 [PATCH 0/5] cpuidle: psci: Various improvements for PSCI PM domains Ulf Hansson
2020-06-15 15:20 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-06-15 15:20 ` [PATCH 1/5] cpuidle: psci: Fail cpuidle registration if set OSI mode failed Ulf Hansson
2020-06-15 15:20 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-06-18 18:01 ` Lina Iyer [this message]
2020-06-18 18:01 ` Lina Iyer
2020-06-26 14:33 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-06-26 14:33 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-06-26 14:47 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-06-26 14:47 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-06-15 15:20 ` [PATCH 2/5] cpuidle: psci: Fix error path via converting to a platform driver Ulf Hansson
2020-06-15 15:20 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-06-26 14:42 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-06-26 14:42 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-06-26 23:06 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-06-26 23:06 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-06-15 15:20 ` [PATCH 3/5] cpuidle: psci: Split into two separate build objects Ulf Hansson
2020-06-15 15:20 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-06-18 18:02 ` Lina Iyer
2020-06-18 18:02 ` Lina Iyer
2020-06-26 14:44 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-06-26 14:44 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-06-15 15:20 ` [PATCH 4/5] cpuidle: psci: Convert PM domain to platform driver Ulf Hansson
2020-06-15 15:20 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-06-23 17:21 ` Lina Iyer
2020-06-23 17:21 ` Lina Iyer
2020-06-15 15:20 ` [PATCH 5/5] cpuidle: psci: Prevent domain idlestates until consumers are ready Ulf Hansson
2020-06-15 15:20 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-06-15 18:05 ` Saravana Kannan
2020-06-15 18:05 ` Saravana Kannan
2020-06-16 6:49 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-06-16 6:49 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-06-16 7:05 ` Saravana Kannan
2020-06-16 7:05 ` Saravana Kannan
2020-06-24 9:57 ` [PATCH 0/5] cpuidle: psci: Various improvements for PSCI PM domains Ulf Hansson
2020-06-24 9:57 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-06-30 10:23 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-06-30 10:23 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-07-07 11:53 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-07-07 11:53 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-07-07 12:37 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-07-07 12:37 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-07-07 12:51 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-07-07 12:51 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-07-07 13:26 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-07-07 13:26 ` Lukasz Luba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200618180150.GK12942@codeaurora.org \
--to=ilina@codeaurora.org \
--cc=Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=benjamin.gaignard@st.com \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.