From: refactormyself@gmail.com
To: helgaas@kernel.org
Cc: Bolarinwa Olayemi Saheed <refactormyself@gmail.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH 2/2] PCI: pciehp: Fix wrong failure check on pcie_capability_read_*()
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 22:12:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200619201219.32126-3-refactormyself@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200619201219.32126-1-refactormyself@gmail.com>
From: Bolarinwa Olayemi Saheed <refactormyself@gmail.com>
On failure, pcie_capabiility_read_*() will set the status value,
its last parameter to 0 and not ~0.
This bug fix checks for the proper value.
Signed-off-by: Bolarinwa Olayemi Saheed <refactormyself@gmail.com>
---
drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
index 53433b37e181..c1a67054948a 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static int pcie_poll_cmd(struct controller *ctrl, int timeout)
do {
pcie_capability_read_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_SLTSTA, &slot_status);
- if (slot_status == (u16) ~0) {
+ if (slot_status == (u16)0) {
ctrl_info(ctrl, "%s: no response from device\n",
__func__);
return 0;
@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ static void pcie_do_write_cmd(struct controller *ctrl, u16 cmd,
pcie_wait_cmd(ctrl);
pcie_capability_read_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_SLTCTL, &slot_ctrl);
- if (slot_ctrl == (u16) ~0) {
+ if (slot_ctrl == (u16)0) {
ctrl_info(ctrl, "%s: no response from device\n", __func__);
goto out;
}
@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ int pciehp_check_link_active(struct controller *ctrl)
int ret;
ret = pcie_capability_read_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_LNKSTA, &lnk_status);
- if (ret == PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND || lnk_status == (u16)~0)
+ if (ret == PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND || lnk_status == (u16)0)
return -ENODEV;
ret = !!(lnk_status & PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_DLLLA);
@@ -440,7 +440,7 @@ int pciehp_card_present(struct controller *ctrl)
int ret;
ret = pcie_capability_read_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_SLTSTA, &slot_status);
- if (ret == PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND || slot_status == (u16)~0)
+ if (ret == PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND || slot_status == (u16)0)
return -ENODEV;
return !!(slot_status & PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_PDS);
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ static irqreturn_t pciehp_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
read_status:
pcie_capability_read_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_SLTSTA, &status);
- if (status == (u16) ~0) {
+ if (status == (u16)0) {
ctrl_info(ctrl, "%s: no response from device\n", __func__);
if (parent)
pm_runtime_put(parent);
--
2.18.2
_______________________________________________
Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: refactormyself@gmail.com
To: helgaas@kernel.org
Cc: Bolarinwa Olayemi Saheed <refactormyself@gmail.com>,
bjorn@helgaas.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: pciehp: Fix wrong failure check on pcie_capability_read_*()
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 22:12:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200619201219.32126-3-refactormyself@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200619201219.32126-1-refactormyself@gmail.com>
From: Bolarinwa Olayemi Saheed <refactormyself@gmail.com>
On failure, pcie_capabiility_read_*() will set the status value,
its last parameter to 0 and not ~0.
This bug fix checks for the proper value.
Signed-off-by: Bolarinwa Olayemi Saheed <refactormyself@gmail.com>
---
drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
index 53433b37e181..c1a67054948a 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static int pcie_poll_cmd(struct controller *ctrl, int timeout)
do {
pcie_capability_read_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_SLTSTA, &slot_status);
- if (slot_status == (u16) ~0) {
+ if (slot_status == (u16)0) {
ctrl_info(ctrl, "%s: no response from device\n",
__func__);
return 0;
@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ static void pcie_do_write_cmd(struct controller *ctrl, u16 cmd,
pcie_wait_cmd(ctrl);
pcie_capability_read_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_SLTCTL, &slot_ctrl);
- if (slot_ctrl == (u16) ~0) {
+ if (slot_ctrl == (u16)0) {
ctrl_info(ctrl, "%s: no response from device\n", __func__);
goto out;
}
@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ int pciehp_check_link_active(struct controller *ctrl)
int ret;
ret = pcie_capability_read_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_LNKSTA, &lnk_status);
- if (ret == PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND || lnk_status == (u16)~0)
+ if (ret == PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND || lnk_status == (u16)0)
return -ENODEV;
ret = !!(lnk_status & PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_DLLLA);
@@ -440,7 +440,7 @@ int pciehp_card_present(struct controller *ctrl)
int ret;
ret = pcie_capability_read_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_SLTSTA, &slot_status);
- if (ret == PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND || slot_status == (u16)~0)
+ if (ret == PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND || slot_status == (u16)0)
return -ENODEV;
return !!(slot_status & PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_PDS);
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ static irqreturn_t pciehp_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
read_status:
pcie_capability_read_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_SLTSTA, &status);
- if (status == (u16) ~0) {
+ if (status == (u16)0) {
ctrl_info(ctrl, "%s: no response from device\n", __func__);
if (parent)
pm_runtime_put(parent);
--
2.18.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-19 21:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-19 20:12 [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH 0/2] Fix wrong failure check on pcie_capability_read_*() refactormyself
2020-06-19 20:12 ` refactormyself
2020-06-19 20:12 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH 1/2] PCI/PME: " refactormyself
2020-06-19 20:12 ` refactormyself
2020-06-19 20:12 ` refactormyself [this message]
2020-06-19 20:12 ` [PATCH 2/2] PCI: pciehp: " refactormyself
2020-06-20 9:09 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Lukas Wunner
2020-06-20 9:09 ` Lukas Wunner
2020-06-26 19:14 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Bjorn Helgaas
2020-06-26 19:14 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200619201219.32126-3-refactormyself@gmail.com \
--to=refactormyself@gmail.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.