From: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [RFC v9 01/10] cpe-info: new make target
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 10:45:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200621084540.GZ2351@scaer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200616170341.45098-1-matthew.weber@rockwellcollins.com>
On 2020-06-16 12:03 -0500, Matt Weber spake thusly:
> Similar to make legal-info, produce a csv delimited file containing
> all selected packages CPE identification.
>
> By default, support the pkg infra defining a set of CPE_ID_* defaults
> using the package name for the vendor and name as most CPE IDs seem
> to align with that assumption. Plus initially, use the pkg version as
> the CPE ID's version field.
So, as I understand it, the CPE info for host packages will also be
stored in the generated file, but it will be a partial list.
For example, if a host package has a Config.in option (e.g. aespipe,
with BR2_PACKAGE_HOST_AESPIPE=y), then it will be listed in PACKAGES,
and so will be present in the CPE manifest.
But on the other hand, a host package that has no Config.in option but
is oart of the dependency chain of a package (e.g. host-pkgconf) will
not be listed in PACKAGES, and thus will not appear in the manifest.
This is a bit awkward I think.
As far as I understand it, the CPE info is (mostly|only) usefull to
then query the CVE list applicable to that CPE.
As such, this is (mostly|only) relevant to the target packages, I would
think, no? Thus, host pakcages should be filtered out.
If we are however interested by the CPE info for host packages, probably
that should go to a separate manifest, like for the legal-info, no?
Also, see an issue, below...
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Weber <matthew.weber@rockwellcollins.com>
> ---
[--SNIP--]
> @@ -864,6 +865,19 @@ legal-info: legal-info-clean legal-info-prepare $(foreach p,$(PACKAGES),$(p)-all
> mv .legal-info.sha256 legal-info.sha256)
> @echo "Legal info produced in $(LEGAL_INFO_DIR)"
>
> +.PHONY: cpe-info-clean
> +cpe-info-clean:
> + @rm -f $(CPE_MANIFEST_CSV)
This must also be removed on 'make clean'.
> +.PHONY: cpe-info-prepare
> +cpe-info-prepare:
> + @$(call MESSAGE,"Gathering CPE info")
> + @$(call cpe-manifest,CPE ID,CVE PATCHED,PACKAGE,VERSION,SOURCE SITE)
> +
> +.PHONY: cpe-info
> +cpe-info: cpe-info-clean cpe-info-prepare $(foreach p,$(PACKAGES),$(p)-cpe-info)
I think this depednecy is incorrect. Indeed, you reallt want that
cpe-info-clean be run before cpe-info-prepare, so I think you'll need
these dependencies:
cpe-info-prepare: cpe-info-clean
cpe-info: cpe-info-prepare
cpe-info: $(foreach p,$(filter-out host-%,$(PACKAGES)),$(p)-cpe-info)
(Yes, I see you modeled your dependencies on the legal-info ones, but I
think they are broken.)
[--SNIP--]
> diff --git a/package/pkg-utils.mk b/package/pkg-utils.mk
> index d88a14ab0f..9818eda12d 100644
> --- a/package/pkg-utils.mk
> +++ b/package/pkg-utils.mk
> @@ -223,3 +223,11 @@ legal-deps = \
> $(filter-out $(if $(1:host-%=),host-%),\
> $(call non-virtual-deps,\
> $($(call UPPERCASE,$(1))_FINAL_RECURSIVE_DEPENDENCIES))),$(p) [$($(call UPPERCASE,$(p))_LICENSE)])
> +
> +#
> +# cpe-info helper functions
> +#
> +
> +define cpe-manifest # cpe, pkg name, version, url
> + echo '"$(1)","$(2)","$(3)","$(4)"' >>$(CPE_MANIFEST_CSV)
> +endef
If (and *if*) we need the CPE info for host packages, then we could
change this helper to redirect to the appropriate manifest, a bit like
is done for legal-info.
But I'm not sure we want it (at least not now).
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
> --
> 2.17.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> buildroot mailing list
> buildroot at busybox.net
> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
--
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
| Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ |
| +33 561 099 427 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-21 8:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-16 17:03 [Buildroot] [RFC v9 01/10] cpe-info: new make target Matt Weber
2020-06-16 17:03 ` [Buildroot] [RFC v9 02/10] cpe-info: id prefix/suffix Matt Weber
2020-06-21 9:23 ` Yann E. MORIN
2020-06-22 11:34 ` Matthew Weber
2020-06-25 11:04 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2020-06-16 17:03 ` [Buildroot] [RFC v9 03/10] cpe-info: only report target pkgs Matt Weber
2020-06-21 8:56 ` Yann E. MORIN
2020-06-22 11:35 ` Matthew Weber
2020-06-16 17:03 ` [Buildroot] [RFC v9 04/10] cpe-info: cpe minor version support Matt Weber
2020-06-16 17:03 ` [Buildroot] [RFC v9 05/10] toolchain/toolchain-ext: glibc cpe-info support Matt Weber
2020-06-25 11:09 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2020-06-16 17:03 ` [Buildroot] [RFC v9 06/10] cpe-info: update manual for new pkg vars Matt Weber
2020-06-25 11:12 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2020-06-16 17:03 ` [Buildroot] [RFC v9 07/10] support/scripts/cpedb.py: new CPE XML helper Matt Weber
2020-06-25 11:14 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2020-06-16 17:03 ` [Buildroot] [RFC v9 08/10] support/scripts/cpe-report: new script Matt Weber
2020-06-25 11:18 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2020-06-16 17:03 ` [Buildroot] [RFC v9 09/10] docs/manual: new security management section Matt Weber
2020-06-16 17:03 ` [Buildroot] [RFC v9 10/10] packages: fixup of cpe info Matt Weber
2020-06-21 8:45 ` Yann E. MORIN [this message]
2020-06-22 11:44 ` [Buildroot] [RFC v9 01/10] cpe-info: new make target Matthew Weber
2020-06-22 20:55 ` Frank Hunleth
2020-06-25 11:00 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2020-07-01 7:43 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2020-07-01 11:57 ` Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200621084540.GZ2351@scaer \
--to=yann.morin.1998@free.fr \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.