From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [RFC v9 08/10] support/scripts/cpe-report: new script
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 13:18:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200625131816.06be795b@windsurf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200616170341.45098-8-matthew.weber@rockwellcollins.com>
On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 12:03:39 -0500
Matt Weber <matthew.weber@rockwellcollins.com> wrote:
> The script supports looking up all the CPEs provided in a
> make cpe-info csv file export from a target Buildroot build.
> It checks the current version and suggests a CPE needs update
> or possibly an initial submission is required to NIST.
>
> Adds option to allow alternate locations for the dictionary
> URL and caching of a processed dictionary to speed up execution.
>
> Outputs a cpe/ folder with propsed xml generated from the
> dictionary contents to propose updated versions to NIST.
>
> For missing CPE matches, a cpe-report-missing.txt is created
> by the script that can be used later to manually create proposed
> new NIST dictionary entries.
>
> Ref: NIST has a group email (cpe_dictionary at nist.gov) used to
> recieve these version update and new entry xml files. They do
> process the XML and provide feedback. In some cases they will
> propose back something different where the vendor or version is
> slightly different.
>
> Limitations
> - Currently any use of non-number version identifiers isn't
> supported by NIST as they use ranges to determine impact
> of a CVE
> - Any Linux version from a non-upstream is also not supported
> without manually adjusting the information as the custom
> kernel will more then likely not match the upstream version
> used in the dictionary
>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Weber <matthew.weber@rockwellcollins.com>
At this point, I am not really clear what this script does. Indeed,
what I would have initially expected is a script that based on the
"show-info" output, tells the user what are the known unfixed CVEs
affecting his configuration. But this is not what this cpe-report
script is doing.
I am not sure to understand what are the CPE updates that this script
generates ? Does the NVD database needs to know about all versions of
all software components ? I though the database was indexed by CVE, and
then provided for each CVE the range of versions of the software
component affected by that CVE.
Could you clarify a bit the whole process, and what are those "CPE
updates" sent to NIST useful for ?
> +CPE_XML_URL = "https://static.nvd.nist.gov/feeds/xml/cpe/dictionary/official-cpe-dictionary_v2.3.xml.gz"
Or perhaps this "dictionary" is not about CVEs, but about listing all
versions of all software components ?
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-25 11:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-16 17:03 [Buildroot] [RFC v9 01/10] cpe-info: new make target Matt Weber
2020-06-16 17:03 ` [Buildroot] [RFC v9 02/10] cpe-info: id prefix/suffix Matt Weber
2020-06-21 9:23 ` Yann E. MORIN
2020-06-22 11:34 ` Matthew Weber
2020-06-25 11:04 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2020-06-16 17:03 ` [Buildroot] [RFC v9 03/10] cpe-info: only report target pkgs Matt Weber
2020-06-21 8:56 ` Yann E. MORIN
2020-06-22 11:35 ` Matthew Weber
2020-06-16 17:03 ` [Buildroot] [RFC v9 04/10] cpe-info: cpe minor version support Matt Weber
2020-06-16 17:03 ` [Buildroot] [RFC v9 05/10] toolchain/toolchain-ext: glibc cpe-info support Matt Weber
2020-06-25 11:09 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2020-06-16 17:03 ` [Buildroot] [RFC v9 06/10] cpe-info: update manual for new pkg vars Matt Weber
2020-06-25 11:12 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2020-06-16 17:03 ` [Buildroot] [RFC v9 07/10] support/scripts/cpedb.py: new CPE XML helper Matt Weber
2020-06-25 11:14 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2020-06-16 17:03 ` [Buildroot] [RFC v9 08/10] support/scripts/cpe-report: new script Matt Weber
2020-06-25 11:18 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2020-06-16 17:03 ` [Buildroot] [RFC v9 09/10] docs/manual: new security management section Matt Weber
2020-06-16 17:03 ` [Buildroot] [RFC v9 10/10] packages: fixup of cpe info Matt Weber
2020-06-21 8:45 ` [Buildroot] [RFC v9 01/10] cpe-info: new make target Yann E. MORIN
2020-06-22 11:44 ` Matthew Weber
2020-06-22 20:55 ` Frank Hunleth
2020-06-25 11:00 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2020-07-01 7:43 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2020-07-01 11:57 ` Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200625131816.06be795b@windsurf \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.