All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
	linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	msuchanek@suse.de,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 7/8] powerpc/pmem: Add WARN_ONCE to catch the wrong usage of pmem flush functions.
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 19:27:21 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200629135722.73558-8-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200629135722.73558-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>

We only support persistent memory on P8 and above. This is enforced by the
firmware and further checked on virtualzied platform during platform init.
Add WARN_ONCE in pmem flush routines to catch the wrong usage of these.

Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/cacheflush.h | 2 ++
 arch/powerpc/lib/pmem.c               | 2 ++
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cacheflush.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cacheflush.h
index 95782f77d768..1ab0fa660497 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cacheflush.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cacheflush.h
@@ -103,6 +103,8 @@ static inline void  arch_pmem_flush_barrier(void)
 {
 	if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S))
 		asm volatile(PPC_PHWSYNC ::: "memory");
+	else
+		WARN_ONCE(1, "Using pmem flush on older hardware.");
 }
 
 #include <asm-generic/cacheflush.h>
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/pmem.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/pmem.c
index 21210fa676e5..f40bd908d28d 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/lib/pmem.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/pmem.c
@@ -37,12 +37,14 @@ static inline void clean_pmem_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long stop)
 {
 	if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S))
 		return __clean_pmem_range(start, stop);
+	WARN_ONCE(1, "Using pmem flush on older hardware.");
 }
 
 static inline void flush_pmem_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long stop)
 {
 	if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S))
 		return __flush_pmem_range(start, stop);
+	WARN_ONCE(1, "Using pmem flush on older hardware.");
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.26.2
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nvdimm-leave@lists.01.org

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
	linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>,
	msuchanek@suse.de, oohall@gmail.com,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 7/8] powerpc/pmem: Add WARN_ONCE to catch the wrong usage of pmem flush functions.
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 19:27:21 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200629135722.73558-8-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200629135722.73558-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>

We only support persistent memory on P8 and above. This is enforced by the
firmware and further checked on virtualzied platform during platform init.
Add WARN_ONCE in pmem flush routines to catch the wrong usage of these.

Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/cacheflush.h | 2 ++
 arch/powerpc/lib/pmem.c               | 2 ++
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cacheflush.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cacheflush.h
index 95782f77d768..1ab0fa660497 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cacheflush.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cacheflush.h
@@ -103,6 +103,8 @@ static inline void  arch_pmem_flush_barrier(void)
 {
 	if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S))
 		asm volatile(PPC_PHWSYNC ::: "memory");
+	else
+		WARN_ONCE(1, "Using pmem flush on older hardware.");
 }
 
 #include <asm-generic/cacheflush.h>
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/pmem.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/pmem.c
index 21210fa676e5..f40bd908d28d 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/lib/pmem.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/pmem.c
@@ -37,12 +37,14 @@ static inline void clean_pmem_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long stop)
 {
 	if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S))
 		return __clean_pmem_range(start, stop);
+	WARN_ONCE(1, "Using pmem flush on older hardware.");
 }
 
 static inline void flush_pmem_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long stop)
 {
 	if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S))
 		return __flush_pmem_range(start, stop);
+	WARN_ONCE(1, "Using pmem flush on older hardware.");
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.26.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-06-29 13:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-29 13:57 [PATCH v6 0/8] Support new pmem flush and sync instructions for POWER Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-29 13:57 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-29 13:57 ` [PATCH v6 1/8] powerpc/pmem: Restrict papr_scm to P8 and above Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-29 13:57   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-29 13:57 ` [PATCH v6 2/8] powerpc/pmem: Add new instructions for persistent storage and sync Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-29 13:57   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-29 13:57 ` [PATCH v6 3/8] powerpc/pmem: Add flush routines using new pmem store and sync instruction Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-29 13:57   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-29 13:57 ` [PATCH v6 4/8] libnvdimm/nvdimm/flush: Allow architecture to override the flush barrier Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-29 13:57   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-29 18:53   ` kernel test robot
2020-06-29 18:53     ` kernel test robot
2020-06-29 18:53     ` kernel test robot
2020-06-29 20:27     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-29 20:27       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-29 19:27   ` kernel test robot
2020-06-29 19:27     ` kernel test robot
2020-06-29 19:27     ` kernel test robot
2020-06-29 20:29   ` [PATCH updated] " Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-29 20:29     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-30  1:32     ` Dan Williams
2020-06-30  1:32       ` Dan Williams
2020-06-30  5:01       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-30  5:01         ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-30  7:06         ` Dan Williams
2020-06-30  7:06           ` Dan Williams
2020-06-30  7:22           ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-30  7:22             ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-30  7:53             ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-30  7:53               ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-30 12:48             ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-30 12:48               ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-30 19:21               ` Dan Williams
2020-06-30 19:21                 ` Dan Williams
2020-06-29 13:57 ` [PATCH v6 5/8] powerpc/pmem/of_pmem: Update of_pmem to use the new barrier instruction Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-29 13:57   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-30  1:38   ` Dan Williams
2020-06-30  1:38     ` Dan Williams
2020-06-30  5:05     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-30  5:05       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-30  7:16       ` Dan Williams
2020-06-30  7:16         ` Dan Williams
2020-06-29 13:57 ` [PATCH v6 6/8] powerpc/pmem: Avoid the barrier in flush routines Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-29 13:57   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-29 16:09   ` Michal Suchánek
2020-06-29 16:09     ` Michal Suchánek
2020-06-29 20:40     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-29 20:40       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-30  1:50       ` Dan Williams
2020-06-30  1:50         ` Dan Williams
2020-06-30  8:54         ` Michal Suchánek
2020-06-30  8:54           ` Michal Suchánek
2020-06-30  9:20           ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-30  9:20             ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-30 19:45             ` Dan Williams
2020-06-30 19:45               ` Dan Williams
2020-07-01  3:09               ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-07-01  3:09                 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-07-01  5:08                 ` Dan Williams
2020-07-01  5:08                   ` Dan Williams
2020-06-29 13:57 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2020-06-29 13:57   ` [PATCH v6 7/8] powerpc/pmem: Add WARN_ONCE to catch the wrong usage of pmem flush functions Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-30  1:52   ` Dan Williams
2020-06-30  1:52     ` Dan Williams
2020-06-30  5:05     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-30  5:05       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-29 13:57 ` [PATCH v6 8/8] powerpc/pmem: Initialize pmem device on newer hardware Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-06-29 13:57   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200629135722.73558-8-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=msuchanek@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.