From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Raj Ashok <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] iommu/vt-d: Handle non-page aligned address
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 10:19:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200630101947.1d45ac94@jacob-builder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <037cb7cf-1336-f546-7f45-c35caf19930f@linux.intel.com>
On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 18:05:52 +0800
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2020/6/23 23:43, Jacob Pan wrote:
> > From: Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> >
> > Address information for device TLB invalidation comes from userspace
> > when device is directly assigned to a guest with vIOMMU support.
> > VT-d requires page aligned address. This patch checks and enforce
> > address to be page aligned, otherwise reserved bits can be set in
> > the invalidation descriptor. Unrecoverable fault will be reported
> > due to non-zero value in the reserved bits.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
> > index d9f973fa1190..53f4e5003620 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
> > @@ -1455,9 +1455,24 @@ void qi_flush_dev_iotlb_pasid(struct
> > intel_iommu *iommu, u16 sid, u16 pfsid,
> > * Max Invs Pending (MIP) is set to 0 for now until we
> > have DIT in
> > * ECAP.
> > */
> > - desc.qw1 |= addr & ~mask;
> > - if (size_order)
> > + if (addr & ~VTD_PAGE_MASK)
> > + pr_warn_ratelimited("Invalidate non-page aligned
> > address %llx\n", addr); +
> > + if (size_order) {
> > + /* Take page address */
> > + desc.qw1 |= QI_DEV_EIOTLB_ADDR(addr);
>
> If size_order == 0 (that means only a single page is about to be
> invalidated), do you still need to set ADDR field of the descriptor?
>
Good catch! we should always set addr. I will move addr assignment out
of the if condition.
.
> Best regards,
> baolu
>
> > + /*
> > + * Existing 0s in address below size_order may be
> > the least
> > + * significant bit, we must set them to 1s to
> > avoid having
> > + * smaller size than desired.
> > + */
> > + desc.qw1 |= GENMASK_ULL(size_order +
> > VTD_PAGE_SHIFT,
> > + VTD_PAGE_SHIFT);
> > + /* Clear size_order bit to indicate size */
> > + desc.qw1 &= ~mask;
> > + /* Set the S bit to indicate flushing more than 1
> > page */ desc.qw1 |= QI_DEV_EIOTLB_SIZE;
> > + }
> >
> > qi_submit_sync(iommu, &desc, 1, 0);
> > }
> >
[Jacob Pan]
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>, "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Raj Ashok <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] iommu/vt-d: Handle non-page aligned address
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 10:19:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200630101947.1d45ac94@jacob-builder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <037cb7cf-1336-f546-7f45-c35caf19930f@linux.intel.com>
On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 18:05:52 +0800
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2020/6/23 23:43, Jacob Pan wrote:
> > From: Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> >
> > Address information for device TLB invalidation comes from userspace
> > when device is directly assigned to a guest with vIOMMU support.
> > VT-d requires page aligned address. This patch checks and enforce
> > address to be page aligned, otherwise reserved bits can be set in
> > the invalidation descriptor. Unrecoverable fault will be reported
> > due to non-zero value in the reserved bits.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
> > index d9f973fa1190..53f4e5003620 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
> > @@ -1455,9 +1455,24 @@ void qi_flush_dev_iotlb_pasid(struct
> > intel_iommu *iommu, u16 sid, u16 pfsid,
> > * Max Invs Pending (MIP) is set to 0 for now until we
> > have DIT in
> > * ECAP.
> > */
> > - desc.qw1 |= addr & ~mask;
> > - if (size_order)
> > + if (addr & ~VTD_PAGE_MASK)
> > + pr_warn_ratelimited("Invalidate non-page aligned
> > address %llx\n", addr); +
> > + if (size_order) {
> > + /* Take page address */
> > + desc.qw1 |= QI_DEV_EIOTLB_ADDR(addr);
>
> If size_order == 0 (that means only a single page is about to be
> invalidated), do you still need to set ADDR field of the descriptor?
>
Good catch! we should always set addr. I will move addr assignment out
of the if condition.
.
> Best regards,
> baolu
>
> > + /*
> > + * Existing 0s in address below size_order may be
> > the least
> > + * significant bit, we must set them to 1s to
> > avoid having
> > + * smaller size than desired.
> > + */
> > + desc.qw1 |= GENMASK_ULL(size_order +
> > VTD_PAGE_SHIFT,
> > + VTD_PAGE_SHIFT);
> > + /* Clear size_order bit to indicate size */
> > + desc.qw1 &= ~mask;
> > + /* Set the S bit to indicate flushing more than 1
> > page */ desc.qw1 |= QI_DEV_EIOTLB_SIZE;
> > + }
> >
> > qi_submit_sync(iommu, &desc, 1, 0);
> > }
> >
[Jacob Pan]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-30 17:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-23 15:43 [PATCH 0/7] iommu/vt-d: Misc tweaks and fixes for vSVA Jacob Pan
2020-06-23 15:43 ` Jacob Pan
2020-06-23 15:43 ` [PATCH 1/7] iommu/vt-d: Enforce PASID devTLB field mask Jacob Pan
2020-06-23 15:43 ` Jacob Pan
2020-06-25 7:14 ` Lu Baolu
2020-06-25 7:14 ` Lu Baolu
2020-06-23 15:43 ` [PATCH 2/7] iommu/vt-d: Remove global page support in devTLB flush Jacob Pan
2020-06-23 15:43 ` Jacob Pan
2020-06-25 7:17 ` Lu Baolu
2020-06-25 7:17 ` Lu Baolu
2020-06-23 15:43 ` [PATCH 3/7] iommu/vt-d: Fix PASID devTLB invalidation Jacob Pan
2020-06-23 15:43 ` Jacob Pan
2020-06-25 7:25 ` Lu Baolu
2020-06-25 7:25 ` Lu Baolu
2020-06-30 3:01 ` Tian, Kevin
2020-06-30 3:01 ` Tian, Kevin
2020-06-30 4:58 ` Jacob Pan
2020-06-30 4:58 ` Jacob Pan
2020-06-30 4:57 ` Jacob Pan
2020-06-30 4:57 ` Jacob Pan
2020-06-23 15:43 ` [PATCH 4/7] iommu/vt-d: Handle non-page aligned address Jacob Pan
2020-06-23 15:43 ` Jacob Pan
2020-06-25 10:05 ` Lu Baolu
2020-06-25 10:05 ` Lu Baolu
2020-06-30 17:19 ` Jacob Pan [this message]
2020-06-30 17:19 ` Jacob Pan
2020-06-23 15:43 ` [PATCH 5/7] iommu/vt-d: Fix devTLB flush for vSVA Jacob Pan
2020-06-23 15:43 ` Jacob Pan
2020-06-23 20:12 ` kernel test robot
2020-06-23 20:12 ` kernel test robot
2020-06-23 20:12 ` kernel test robot
2020-06-24 0:38 ` Jacob Pan
2020-06-24 0:38 ` Jacob Pan
2020-06-23 15:43 ` [PATCH 6/7] iommu/vt-d: Warn on out-of-range invalidation address Jacob Pan
2020-06-23 15:43 ` Jacob Pan
2020-06-25 10:10 ` Lu Baolu
2020-06-25 10:10 ` Lu Baolu
2020-06-30 17:34 ` Jacob Pan
2020-06-30 17:34 ` Jacob Pan
2020-07-01 1:45 ` Lu Baolu
2020-07-01 1:45 ` Lu Baolu
2020-07-01 14:19 ` Jacob Pan
2020-07-01 14:19 ` Jacob Pan
2020-06-23 15:43 ` [PATCH 7/7] iommu/vt-d: Disable multiple GPASID-dev bind Jacob Pan
2020-06-23 15:43 ` Jacob Pan
2020-06-25 12:54 ` Lu Baolu
2020-06-25 12:54 ` Lu Baolu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200630101947.1d45ac94@jacob-builder \
--to=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.