All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>,
	Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
	Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, v
Subject: [PATCH 06/18] vhost: Remove redundant use of read_barrier_depends() barrier
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 18:37:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200630173734.14057-7-will@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200630173734.14057-1-will@kernel.org>

Since commit 76ebbe78f739 ("locking/barriers: Add implicit
smp_read_barrier_depends() to READ_ONCE()"), there is no need to use
smp_read_barrier_depends() outside of the Alpha architecture code.

Unfortunately, there is precisely _one_ user in the vhost code, and
there isn't an obvious READ_ONCE() access making the barrier
redundant. However, on closer inspection (thanks, Jason), it appears
that vring synchronisation between the producer and consumer occurs via
the 'avail_idx' field, which is followed up by an rmb() in
vhost_get_vq_desc(), making the read_barrier_depends() redundant on
Alpha.

Jason says:

  | I'm also confused about the barrier here, basically in driver side
  | we did:
  |
  | 1) allocate pages
  | 2) store pages in indirect->addr
  | 3) smp_wmb()
  | 4) increase the avail idx (somehow a tail pointer of vring)
  |
  | in vhost we did:
  |
  | 1) read avail idx
  | 2) smp_rmb()
  | 3) read indirect->addr
  | 4) read from indirect->addr
  |
  | It looks to me even the data dependency barrier is not necessary
  | since we have rmb() which is sufficient for us to the correct
  | indirect->addr and driver are not expected to do any writing to
  | indirect->addr after avail idx is increased

Remove the redundant barrier invocation.

Suggested-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 5 -----
 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
index d7b8df3edffc..74d135ee7e26 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
@@ -2092,11 +2092,6 @@ static int get_indirect(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
 		return ret;
 	}
 	iov_iter_init(&from, READ, vq->indirect, ret, len);
-
-	/* We will use the result as an address to read from, so most
-	 * architectures only need a compiler barrier here. */
-	read_barrier_depends();
-
 	count = len / sizeof desc;
 	/* Buffers are chained via a 16 bit next field, so
 	 * we can have at most 2^16 of these. */
-- 
2.27.0.212.ge8ba1cc988-goog


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>,
	Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
	Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-alpha@vger.kernel.orgv
Subject: [PATCH 06/18] vhost: Remove redundant use of read_barrier_depends() barrier
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 18:37:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200630173734.14057-7-will@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200630173734.14057-1-will@kernel.org>

Since commit 76ebbe78f739 ("locking/barriers: Add implicit
smp_read_barrier_depends() to READ_ONCE()"), there is no need to use
smp_read_barrier_depends() outside of the Alpha architecture code.

Unfortunately, there is precisely _one_ user in the vhost code, and
there isn't an obvious READ_ONCE() access making the barrier
redundant. However, on closer inspection (thanks, Jason), it appears
that vring synchronisation between the producer and consumer occurs via
the 'avail_idx' field, which is followed up by an rmb() in
vhost_get_vq_desc(), making the read_barrier_depends() redundant on
Alpha.

Jason says:

  | I'm also confused about the barrier here, basically in driver side
  | we did:
  |
  | 1) allocate pages
  | 2) store pages in indirect->addr
  | 3) smp_wmb()
  | 4) increase the avail idx (somehow a tail pointer of vring)
  |
  | in vhost we did:
  |
  | 1) read avail idx
  | 2) smp_rmb()
  | 3) read indirect->addr
  | 4) read from indirect->addr
  |
  | It looks to me even the data dependency barrier is not necessary
  | since we have rmb() which is sufficient for us to the correct
  | indirect->addr and driver are not expected to do any writing to
  | indirect->addr after avail idx is increased

Remove the redundant barrier invocation.

Suggested-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 5 -----
 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
index d7b8df3edffc..74d135ee7e26 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
@@ -2092,11 +2092,6 @@ static int get_indirect(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
 		return ret;
 	}
 	iov_iter_init(&from, READ, vq->indirect, ret, len);
-
-	/* We will use the result as an address to read from, so most
-	 * architectures only need a compiler barrier here. */
-	read_barrier_depends();
-
 	count = len / sizeof desc;
 	/* Buffers are chained via a 16 bit next field, so
 	 * we can have at most 2^16 of these. */
-- 
2.27.0.212.ge8ba1cc988-goog

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>,
	Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com, Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 06/18] vhost: Remove redundant use of read_barrier_depends() barrier
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 18:37:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200630173734.14057-7-will@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200630173734.14057-1-will@kernel.org>

Since commit 76ebbe78f739 ("locking/barriers: Add implicit
smp_read_barrier_depends() to READ_ONCE()"), there is no need to use
smp_read_barrier_depends() outside of the Alpha architecture code.

Unfortunately, there is precisely _one_ user in the vhost code, and
there isn't an obvious READ_ONCE() access making the barrier
redundant. However, on closer inspection (thanks, Jason), it appears
that vring synchronisation between the producer and consumer occurs via
the 'avail_idx' field, which is followed up by an rmb() in
vhost_get_vq_desc(), making the read_barrier_depends() redundant on
Alpha.

Jason says:

  | I'm also confused about the barrier here, basically in driver side
  | we did:
  |
  | 1) allocate pages
  | 2) store pages in indirect->addr
  | 3) smp_wmb()
  | 4) increase the avail idx (somehow a tail pointer of vring)
  |
  | in vhost we did:
  |
  | 1) read avail idx
  | 2) smp_rmb()
  | 3) read indirect->addr
  | 4) read from indirect->addr
  |
  | It looks to me even the data dependency barrier is not necessary
  | since we have rmb() which is sufficient for us to the correct
  | indirect->addr and driver are not expected to do any writing to
  | indirect->addr after avail idx is increased

Remove the redundant barrier invocation.

Suggested-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 5 -----
 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
index d7b8df3edffc..74d135ee7e26 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
@@ -2092,11 +2092,6 @@ static int get_indirect(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
 		return ret;
 	}
 	iov_iter_init(&from, READ, vq->indirect, ret, len);
-
-	/* We will use the result as an address to read from, so most
-	 * architectures only need a compiler barrier here. */
-	read_barrier_depends();
-
 	count = len / sizeof desc;
 	/* Buffers are chained via a 16 bit next field, so
 	 * we can have at most 2^16 of these. */
-- 
2.27.0.212.ge8ba1cc988-goog


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>,
	Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
	Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	kernel-team@android.com
Subject: [PATCH 06/18] vhost: Remove redundant use of read_barrier_depends() barrier
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 18:37:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200630173734.14057-7-will@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200630173734.14057-1-will@kernel.org>

Since commit 76ebbe78f739 ("locking/barriers: Add implicit
smp_read_barrier_depends() to READ_ONCE()"), there is no need to use
smp_read_barrier_depends() outside of the Alpha architecture code.

Unfortunately, there is precisely _one_ user in the vhost code, and
there isn't an obvious READ_ONCE() access making the barrier
redundant. However, on closer inspection (thanks, Jason), it appears
that vring synchronisation between the producer and consumer occurs via
the 'avail_idx' field, which is followed up by an rmb() in
vhost_get_vq_desc(), making the read_barrier_depends() redundant on
Alpha.

Jason says:

  | I'm also confused about the barrier here, basically in driver side
  | we did:
  |
  | 1) allocate pages
  | 2) store pages in indirect->addr
  | 3) smp_wmb()
  | 4) increase the avail idx (somehow a tail pointer of vring)
  |
  | in vhost we did:
  |
  | 1) read avail idx
  | 2) smp_rmb()
  | 3) read indirect->addr
  | 4) read from indirect->addr
  |
  | It looks to me even the data dependency barrier is not necessary
  | since we have rmb() which is sufficient for us to the correct
  | indirect->addr and driver are not expected to do any writing to
  | indirect->addr after avail idx is increased

Remove the redundant barrier invocation.

Suggested-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 5 -----
 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
index d7b8df3edffc..74d135ee7e26 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
@@ -2092,11 +2092,6 @@ static int get_indirect(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
 		return ret;
 	}
 	iov_iter_init(&from, READ, vq->indirect, ret, len);
-
-	/* We will use the result as an address to read from, so most
-	 * architectures only need a compiler barrier here. */
-	read_barrier_depends();
-
 	count = len / sizeof desc;
 	/* Buffers are chained via a 16 bit next field, so
 	 * we can have at most 2^16 of these. */
-- 
2.27.0.212.ge8ba1cc988-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-06-30 17:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 200+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-30 17:37 [PATCH 00/18] Allow architectures to override __READ_ONCE() Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37 ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37 ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37 ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 01/18] tools: bpf: Use local copy of headers including uapi/linux/filter.h Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-07-01 16:38   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-07-01 16:38     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-07-01 16:38     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-07-01 16:38     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 02/18] compiler.h: Split {READ,WRITE}_ONCE definitions out into rwonce.h Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` [PATCH 02/18] compiler.h: Split {READ, WRITE}_ONCE " Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` [PATCH 02/18] compiler.h: Split {READ,WRITE}_ONCE " Will Deacon
2020-06-30 19:11   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-06-30 19:11     ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-06-30 19:11     ` [PATCH 02/18] compiler.h: Split {READ, WRITE}_ONCE " Arnd Bergmann
2020-07-01 10:16     ` [PATCH 02/18] compiler.h: Split {READ,WRITE}_ONCE " Will Deacon
2020-07-01 10:16       ` Will Deacon
2020-07-01 10:16       ` Will Deacon
2020-07-01 11:33       ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-07-01 11:33         ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-07-01 11:33         ` [PATCH 02/18] compiler.h: Split {READ, WRITE}_ONCE " Arnd Bergmann
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 03/18] asm/rwonce: Allow __READ_ONCE to be overridden by the architecture Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 04/18] alpha: Override READ_ONCE() with barriered implementation Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-07-02  9:32   ` Mark Rutland
2020-07-02  9:32     ` Mark Rutland
2020-07-02  9:32     ` Mark Rutland
2020-07-02  9:32     ` Mark Rutland
2020-07-02  9:48     ` Will Deacon
2020-07-02  9:48       ` Will Deacon
2020-07-02  9:48       ` Will Deacon
2020-07-02  9:48       ` Will Deacon
2020-07-02 10:08       ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-07-02 10:08         ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-07-02 10:08         ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-07-02 11:18         ` Will Deacon
2020-07-02 11:18           ` Will Deacon
2020-07-02 11:18           ` Will Deacon
2020-07-02 11:39           ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-07-02 11:39             ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-07-02 11:39             ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-07-02 14:43   ` Joel Fernandes
2020-07-02 14:43     ` Joel Fernandes
2020-07-02 14:43     ` Joel Fernandes
2020-07-02 14:55     ` Will Deacon
2020-07-02 14:55       ` Will Deacon
2020-07-02 14:55       ` Will Deacon
2020-07-02 15:07       ` Joel Fernandes
2020-07-02 15:07         ` Joel Fernandes
2020-07-02 15:07         ` Joel Fernandes
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 05/18] asm/rwonce: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends() invocation Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2020-06-30 17:37   ` [PATCH 06/18] vhost: Remove redundant use of read_barrier_depends() barrier Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 07/18] alpha: Replace smp_read_barrier_depends() usage with smp_[r]mb() Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 08/18] locking/barriers: Remove definitions for [smp_]read_barrier_depends() Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 09/18] Documentation/barriers: Remove references to [smp_]read_barrier_depends() Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 10/18] Documentation/barriers/kokr: " Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 11/18] tools/memory-model: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends() from informal doc Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 12/18] include/linux: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends() from comments Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 13/18] checkpatch: Remove checks relating to [smp_]read_barrier_depends() Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 14/18] arm64: Reduce the number of header files pulled into vmlinux.lds.S Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 15/18] arm64: alternatives: Split up alternative.h Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 16/18] arm64: cpufeatures: Add capability for LDAPR instruction Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 17/18] arm64: alternatives: Remove READ_ONCE() usage during patch operation Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37 ` [PATCH 18/18] arm64: lto: Strengthen READ_ONCE() to acquire when CLANG_LTO=y Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2020-06-30 19:25   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-06-30 19:25     ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-06-30 19:25     ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-07-01 10:19     ` Will Deacon
2020-07-01 10:19       ` Will Deacon
2020-07-01 10:19       ` Will Deacon
2020-07-01 10:59       ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-07-01 10:59         ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-07-01 10:59         ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-06-30 19:47   ` Marco Elver
2020-06-30 19:47     ` Marco Elver
2020-06-30 19:47     ` Marco Elver
2020-06-30 20:20     ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-30 20:20       ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-30 20:20       ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-06-30 22:57     ` Sami Tolvanen
2020-06-30 22:57       ` Sami Tolvanen
2020-06-30 22:57       ` Sami Tolvanen
2020-07-01 10:25       ` Will Deacon
2020-07-01 10:25         ` Will Deacon
2020-07-01 10:25         ` Will Deacon
2020-07-01 10:24     ` Will Deacon
2020-07-01 10:24       ` Will Deacon
2020-07-01 10:24       ` Will Deacon
2020-07-01 17:07   ` Dave P Martin
2020-07-01 17:07     ` Dave P Martin
2020-07-01 17:07     ` Dave P Martin
2020-07-02  7:23     ` Will Deacon
2020-07-02  7:23       ` Will Deacon
2020-07-02  7:23       ` Will Deacon
2020-07-06 16:00       ` Dave Martin
2020-07-06 16:00         ` Dave Martin
2020-07-06 16:00         ` Dave Martin
2020-07-06 16:34         ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-07-06 16:34           ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-07-06 16:34           ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-07-06 17:05           ` Dave Martin
2020-07-06 17:05             ` Dave Martin
2020-07-06 17:05             ` Dave Martin
2020-07-06 17:05             ` Dave Martin
2020-07-06 17:36             ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-07-06 17:36               ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-07-06 17:36               ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-07-06 17:36               ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-07-07 10:29               ` Dave Martin
2020-07-07 10:29                 ` Dave Martin
2020-07-07 10:29                 ` Dave Martin
2020-07-07 10:29                 ` Dave Martin
2020-07-07 22:51                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-07-07 22:51                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-07-07 22:51                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-07-07 22:51                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-07-07 23:01                   ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-07-07 23:01                     ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-07-08  7:15                     ` Marco Elver
2020-07-08  7:15                       ` Marco Elver
2020-07-08  7:15                       ` Marco Elver
2020-07-08  9:16                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-08  9:16                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-08  9:16                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-08 18:20                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-07-08 18:20                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-07-08 18:20                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-07-06 18:35         ` Will Deacon
2020-07-06 18:35           ` Will Deacon
2020-07-06 18:35           ` Will Deacon
2020-07-06 19:23           ` Marco Elver
2020-07-06 19:23             ` Marco Elver
2020-07-06 19:23             ` Marco Elver
2020-07-06 19:42             ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-07-06 19:42               ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-07-06 19:42               ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-07-06 19:42               ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-07-06 16:08   ` Dave Martin
2020-07-06 16:08     ` Dave Martin
2020-07-06 16:08     ` Dave Martin
2020-07-06 18:35     ` Will Deacon
2020-07-06 18:35       ` Will Deacon
2020-07-06 18:35       ` Will Deacon
2020-07-07 10:10       ` Dave Martin
2020-07-07 10:10         ` Dave Martin
2020-07-07 10:10         ` Dave Martin
2020-07-01  7:38 ` [PATCH 00/18] Allow architectures to override __READ_ONCE() Josh Triplett
2020-07-01  7:38   ` Josh Triplett
2020-07-01  7:38   ` Josh Triplett
2020-07-01  7:38   ` Josh Triplett

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200630173734.14057-7-will@kernel.org \
    --to=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mattst88@gmail.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    --cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.