All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
	Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-i2c <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: a failing pm_runtime_get increases the refcnt?
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 21:48:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200630194858.GC999@ninjato> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200614140717.heceqlwq75w5if5s@katana>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 389 bytes --]


> However, that probably means that for most patches I am getting, the
> better fix would be to remove the error checking? (I assume most people
> put the error check in there to be on the "safe side" without having a
> real argument to really do it.)

Kindly asking for more input here: A better answer to all these patches
is to ask if the error checking could not be removed instead?


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-30 19:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-14  9:07 RFC: a failing pm_runtime_get increases the refcnt? Wolfram Sang
2020-06-14  9:34 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-14  9:42   ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-14 10:00     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-06-14 10:04       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-06-14 10:44         ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-14 12:42       ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-14 13:59       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-14 14:07         ` Wolfram Sang
2020-06-30 19:48           ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2020-06-14 13:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200630194858.GC999@ninjato \
    --to=wsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.