All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart-ryLnwIuWjnjg/C1BVhZhaw@public.gmane.org>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Thierry Reding
	<thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam-uyr5N9Q2VtJg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	Frank Rowand
	<frowand.list-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org,
	linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/2] of_graph: add of_graph_is_present()
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 08:45:43 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200701054543.GA5963@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200701021617.12030-2-digetx-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>

Hi Dmitry,

Thank you for the patch.

On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 05:16:16AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> In some case, like a DRM display code for example, it's useful to silently
> check whether port node exists at all in a device-tree before proceeding
> with parsing of the graph.
> 
> This patch adds of_graph_is_present() which returns true if given
> device-tree node contains OF graph port.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> ---
>  drivers/of/property.c    | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  include/linux/of_graph.h |  6 +++++
>  2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/of/property.c b/drivers/of/property.c
> index 6a5760f0d6cd..e12b8b491837 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/property.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/property.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,48 @@
>  
>  #include "of_private.h"
>  
> +/**
> + * of_graph_get_first_local_port() - get first local port node
> + * @node: pointer to a local endpoint device_node

It's not an endpoint.

> + *
> + * Return: First local port node associated with local endpoint node linked
> + *	   to @node. Use of_node_put() on it when done.
> + */
> +static struct device_node *
> +of_graph_get_first_local_port(const struct device_node *node)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *ports, *port;
> +
> +	ports = of_get_child_by_name(node, "ports");
> +	if (ports)
> +		node = ports;
> +
> +	port = of_get_child_by_name(node, "port");
> +	of_node_put(ports);
> +
> +	return port;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * of_graph_is_present() - check graph's presence
> + * @node: pointer to a device_node checked for the graph's presence
> + *
> + * Return: True if @node has a port or ports sub-node, false otherwise.
> + */
> +bool of_graph_is_present(const struct device_node *node)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *local;
> +
> +	local = of_graph_get_first_local_port(node);
> +	if (!local)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	of_node_put(local);
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_graph_is_present);
> +
>  /**
>   * of_property_count_elems_of_size - Count the number of elements in a property
>   *
> @@ -608,15 +650,7 @@ struct device_node *of_graph_get_next_endpoint(const struct device_node *parent,
>  	 * parent port node.
>  	 */
>  	if (!prev) {
> -		struct device_node *node;
> -
> -		node = of_get_child_by_name(parent, "ports");
> -		if (node)
> -			parent = node;
> -
> -		port = of_get_child_by_name(parent, "port");
> -		of_node_put(node);
> -
> +		port = of_graph_get_first_local_port(parent);

I think this introduces a bug below in the function, where parent is
used and is expected to point to the ports node if available. I'd leave
this part of the change out, and inline +of_graph_get_first_local_port()
in of_graph_is_present().

>  		if (!port) {
>  			pr_err("graph: no port node found in %pOF\n", parent);
>  			return NULL;
> diff --git a/include/linux/of_graph.h b/include/linux/of_graph.h
> index 01038a6aade0..4d7756087b6b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/of_graph.h
> +++ b/include/linux/of_graph.h
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ struct of_endpoint {
>  	     child = of_graph_get_next_endpoint(parent, child))
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> +bool of_graph_is_present(const struct device_node *node);
>  int of_graph_parse_endpoint(const struct device_node *node,
>  				struct of_endpoint *endpoint);
>  int of_graph_get_endpoint_count(const struct device_node *np);
> @@ -56,6 +57,11 @@ struct device_node *of_graph_get_remote_node(const struct device_node *node,
>  					     u32 port, u32 endpoint);
>  #else
>  
> +static inline bool of_graph_is_present(const struct device_node *node)
> +{
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
>  static inline int of_graph_parse_endpoint(const struct device_node *node,
>  					struct of_endpoint *endpoint)
>  {

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/2] of_graph: add of_graph_is_present()
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 08:45:43 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200701054543.GA5963@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200701021617.12030-2-digetx@gmail.com>

Hi Dmitry,

Thank you for the patch.

On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 05:16:16AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> In some case, like a DRM display code for example, it's useful to silently
> check whether port node exists at all in a device-tree before proceeding
> with parsing of the graph.
> 
> This patch adds of_graph_is_present() which returns true if given
> device-tree node contains OF graph port.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/of/property.c    | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  include/linux/of_graph.h |  6 +++++
>  2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/of/property.c b/drivers/of/property.c
> index 6a5760f0d6cd..e12b8b491837 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/property.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/property.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,48 @@
>  
>  #include "of_private.h"
>  
> +/**
> + * of_graph_get_first_local_port() - get first local port node
> + * @node: pointer to a local endpoint device_node

It's not an endpoint.

> + *
> + * Return: First local port node associated with local endpoint node linked
> + *	   to @node. Use of_node_put() on it when done.
> + */
> +static struct device_node *
> +of_graph_get_first_local_port(const struct device_node *node)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *ports, *port;
> +
> +	ports = of_get_child_by_name(node, "ports");
> +	if (ports)
> +		node = ports;
> +
> +	port = of_get_child_by_name(node, "port");
> +	of_node_put(ports);
> +
> +	return port;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * of_graph_is_present() - check graph's presence
> + * @node: pointer to a device_node checked for the graph's presence
> + *
> + * Return: True if @node has a port or ports sub-node, false otherwise.
> + */
> +bool of_graph_is_present(const struct device_node *node)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *local;
> +
> +	local = of_graph_get_first_local_port(node);
> +	if (!local)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	of_node_put(local);
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_graph_is_present);
> +
>  /**
>   * of_property_count_elems_of_size - Count the number of elements in a property
>   *
> @@ -608,15 +650,7 @@ struct device_node *of_graph_get_next_endpoint(const struct device_node *parent,
>  	 * parent port node.
>  	 */
>  	if (!prev) {
> -		struct device_node *node;
> -
> -		node = of_get_child_by_name(parent, "ports");
> -		if (node)
> -			parent = node;
> -
> -		port = of_get_child_by_name(parent, "port");
> -		of_node_put(node);
> -
> +		port = of_graph_get_first_local_port(parent);

I think this introduces a bug below in the function, where parent is
used and is expected to point to the ports node if available. I'd leave
this part of the change out, and inline +of_graph_get_first_local_port()
in of_graph_is_present().

>  		if (!port) {
>  			pr_err("graph: no port node found in %pOF\n", parent);
>  			return NULL;
> diff --git a/include/linux/of_graph.h b/include/linux/of_graph.h
> index 01038a6aade0..4d7756087b6b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/of_graph.h
> +++ b/include/linux/of_graph.h
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ struct of_endpoint {
>  	     child = of_graph_get_next_endpoint(parent, child))
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> +bool of_graph_is_present(const struct device_node *node);
>  int of_graph_parse_endpoint(const struct device_node *node,
>  				struct of_endpoint *endpoint);
>  int of_graph_get_endpoint_count(const struct device_node *np);
> @@ -56,6 +57,11 @@ struct device_node *of_graph_get_remote_node(const struct device_node *node,
>  					     u32 port, u32 endpoint);
>  #else
>  
> +static inline bool of_graph_is_present(const struct device_node *node)
> +{
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
>  static inline int of_graph_parse_endpoint(const struct device_node *node,
>  					struct of_endpoint *endpoint)
>  {

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/2] of_graph: add of_graph_is_present()
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 08:45:43 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200701054543.GA5963@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200701021617.12030-2-digetx@gmail.com>

Hi Dmitry,

Thank you for the patch.

On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 05:16:16AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> In some case, like a DRM display code for example, it's useful to silently
> check whether port node exists at all in a device-tree before proceeding
> with parsing of the graph.
> 
> This patch adds of_graph_is_present() which returns true if given
> device-tree node contains OF graph port.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/of/property.c    | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  include/linux/of_graph.h |  6 +++++
>  2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/of/property.c b/drivers/of/property.c
> index 6a5760f0d6cd..e12b8b491837 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/property.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/property.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,48 @@
>  
>  #include "of_private.h"
>  
> +/**
> + * of_graph_get_first_local_port() - get first local port node
> + * @node: pointer to a local endpoint device_node

It's not an endpoint.

> + *
> + * Return: First local port node associated with local endpoint node linked
> + *	   to @node. Use of_node_put() on it when done.
> + */
> +static struct device_node *
> +of_graph_get_first_local_port(const struct device_node *node)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *ports, *port;
> +
> +	ports = of_get_child_by_name(node, "ports");
> +	if (ports)
> +		node = ports;
> +
> +	port = of_get_child_by_name(node, "port");
> +	of_node_put(ports);
> +
> +	return port;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * of_graph_is_present() - check graph's presence
> + * @node: pointer to a device_node checked for the graph's presence
> + *
> + * Return: True if @node has a port or ports sub-node, false otherwise.
> + */
> +bool of_graph_is_present(const struct device_node *node)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *local;
> +
> +	local = of_graph_get_first_local_port(node);
> +	if (!local)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	of_node_put(local);
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_graph_is_present);
> +
>  /**
>   * of_property_count_elems_of_size - Count the number of elements in a property
>   *
> @@ -608,15 +650,7 @@ struct device_node *of_graph_get_next_endpoint(const struct device_node *parent,
>  	 * parent port node.
>  	 */
>  	if (!prev) {
> -		struct device_node *node;
> -
> -		node = of_get_child_by_name(parent, "ports");
> -		if (node)
> -			parent = node;
> -
> -		port = of_get_child_by_name(parent, "port");
> -		of_node_put(node);
> -
> +		port = of_graph_get_first_local_port(parent);

I think this introduces a bug below in the function, where parent is
used and is expected to point to the ports node if available. I'd leave
this part of the change out, and inline +of_graph_get_first_local_port()
in of_graph_is_present().

>  		if (!port) {
>  			pr_err("graph: no port node found in %pOF\n", parent);
>  			return NULL;
> diff --git a/include/linux/of_graph.h b/include/linux/of_graph.h
> index 01038a6aade0..4d7756087b6b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/of_graph.h
> +++ b/include/linux/of_graph.h
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ struct of_endpoint {
>  	     child = of_graph_get_next_endpoint(parent, child))
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> +bool of_graph_is_present(const struct device_node *node);
>  int of_graph_parse_endpoint(const struct device_node *node,
>  				struct of_endpoint *endpoint);
>  int of_graph_get_endpoint_count(const struct device_node *np);
> @@ -56,6 +57,11 @@ struct device_node *of_graph_get_remote_node(const struct device_node *node,
>  					     u32 port, u32 endpoint);
>  #else
>  
> +static inline bool of_graph_is_present(const struct device_node *node)
> +{
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
>  static inline int of_graph_parse_endpoint(const struct device_node *node,
>  					struct of_endpoint *endpoint)
>  {

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-07-01  5:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-01  2:16 [PATCH v9 0/2] Silence missing-graph error for DRM bridges Dmitry Osipenko
2020-07-01  2:16 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2020-07-01  2:16 ` Dmitry Osipenko
     [not found] ` <20200701021617.12030-1-digetx-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2020-07-01  2:16   ` [PATCH v9 1/2] of_graph: add of_graph_is_present() Dmitry Osipenko
2020-07-01  2:16     ` Dmitry Osipenko
2020-07-01  2:16     ` Dmitry Osipenko
     [not found]     ` <20200701021617.12030-2-digetx-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2020-07-01  5:45       ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2020-07-01  5:45         ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-07-01  5:45         ` Laurent Pinchart
     [not found]         ` <20200701054543.GA5963-N3hz7ZxfLydczECFQUw77jytWr6r+dGw0E9HWUfgJXw@public.gmane.org>
2020-07-01  6:42           ` Dmitry Osipenko
2020-07-01  6:42             ` Dmitry Osipenko
2020-07-01  6:42             ` Dmitry Osipenko
2020-07-01  2:16   ` [PATCH v9 2/2] drm/of: Make drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge() to check graph's presence Dmitry Osipenko
2020-07-01  2:16     ` Dmitry Osipenko
2020-07-01  2:16     ` Dmitry Osipenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200701054543.GA5963@pendragon.ideasonboard.com \
    --to=laurent.pinchart-rylnwiuwjnjg/c1bvhzhaw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=digetx-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=frowand.list-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=sam-uyr5N9Q2VtJg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.