All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart-ryLnwIuWjnjg/C1BVhZhaw@public.gmane.org>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Thierry Reding
	<thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam-uyr5N9Q2VtJg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	Frank Rowand
	<frowand.list-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org,
	linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/2] of_graph: add of_graph_is_present()
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 10:55:52 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200701075552.GJ5963@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200701074232.13632-2-digetx-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>

Hi Dmitry,

Thank you for the patch.

On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 10:42:31AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> In some cases it's very useful to silently check whether port node exists
> at all in a device-tree before proceeding with parsing the graph. The DRM
> bridges code is one example of such case where absence of a graph in a
> device-tree is a legit condition.
> 
> This patch adds of_graph_is_present() which returns true if given
> device-tree node contains OF graph port.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>

Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart-ryLnwIuWjnjg/C1BVhZhaw@public.gmane.org>

> ---
>  drivers/of/property.c    | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/of_graph.h |  6 ++++++
>  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/of/property.c b/drivers/of/property.c
> index 6a5760f0d6cd..fed7229d9d9f 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/property.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/property.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,29 @@
>  
>  #include "of_private.h"
>  
> +/**
> + * of_graph_is_present() - check graph's presence
> + * @node: pointer to device_node containing graph port
> + *
> + * Return: True if @node has a port or ports (with a port) sub-node,
> + * false otherwise.
> + */
> +bool of_graph_is_present(const struct device_node *node)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *ports, *port;
> +
> +	ports = of_get_child_by_name(node, "ports");
> +	if (ports)
> +		node = ports;
> +
> +	port = of_get_child_by_name(node, "port");
> +	of_node_put(ports);
> +	of_node_put(port);
> +
> +	return !!port;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_graph_is_present);
> +
>  /**
>   * of_property_count_elems_of_size - Count the number of elements in a property
>   *
> diff --git a/include/linux/of_graph.h b/include/linux/of_graph.h
> index 01038a6aade0..4d7756087b6b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/of_graph.h
> +++ b/include/linux/of_graph.h
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ struct of_endpoint {
>  	     child = of_graph_get_next_endpoint(parent, child))
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> +bool of_graph_is_present(const struct device_node *node);
>  int of_graph_parse_endpoint(const struct device_node *node,
>  				struct of_endpoint *endpoint);
>  int of_graph_get_endpoint_count(const struct device_node *np);
> @@ -56,6 +57,11 @@ struct device_node *of_graph_get_remote_node(const struct device_node *node,
>  					     u32 port, u32 endpoint);
>  #else
>  
> +static inline bool of_graph_is_present(const struct device_node *node)
> +{
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
>  static inline int of_graph_parse_endpoint(const struct device_node *node,
>  					struct of_endpoint *endpoint)
>  {

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/2] of_graph: add of_graph_is_present()
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 10:55:52 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200701075552.GJ5963@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200701074232.13632-2-digetx@gmail.com>

Hi Dmitry,

Thank you for the patch.

On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 10:42:31AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> In some cases it's very useful to silently check whether port node exists
> at all in a device-tree before proceeding with parsing the graph. The DRM
> bridges code is one example of such case where absence of a graph in a
> device-tree is a legit condition.
> 
> This patch adds of_graph_is_present() which returns true if given
> device-tree node contains OF graph port.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>

> ---
>  drivers/of/property.c    | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/of_graph.h |  6 ++++++
>  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/of/property.c b/drivers/of/property.c
> index 6a5760f0d6cd..fed7229d9d9f 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/property.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/property.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,29 @@
>  
>  #include "of_private.h"
>  
> +/**
> + * of_graph_is_present() - check graph's presence
> + * @node: pointer to device_node containing graph port
> + *
> + * Return: True if @node has a port or ports (with a port) sub-node,
> + * false otherwise.
> + */
> +bool of_graph_is_present(const struct device_node *node)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *ports, *port;
> +
> +	ports = of_get_child_by_name(node, "ports");
> +	if (ports)
> +		node = ports;
> +
> +	port = of_get_child_by_name(node, "port");
> +	of_node_put(ports);
> +	of_node_put(port);
> +
> +	return !!port;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_graph_is_present);
> +
>  /**
>   * of_property_count_elems_of_size - Count the number of elements in a property
>   *
> diff --git a/include/linux/of_graph.h b/include/linux/of_graph.h
> index 01038a6aade0..4d7756087b6b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/of_graph.h
> +++ b/include/linux/of_graph.h
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ struct of_endpoint {
>  	     child = of_graph_get_next_endpoint(parent, child))
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> +bool of_graph_is_present(const struct device_node *node);
>  int of_graph_parse_endpoint(const struct device_node *node,
>  				struct of_endpoint *endpoint);
>  int of_graph_get_endpoint_count(const struct device_node *np);
> @@ -56,6 +57,11 @@ struct device_node *of_graph_get_remote_node(const struct device_node *node,
>  					     u32 port, u32 endpoint);
>  #else
>  
> +static inline bool of_graph_is_present(const struct device_node *node)
> +{
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
>  static inline int of_graph_parse_endpoint(const struct device_node *node,
>  					struct of_endpoint *endpoint)
>  {

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/2] of_graph: add of_graph_is_present()
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 10:55:52 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200701075552.GJ5963@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200701074232.13632-2-digetx@gmail.com>

Hi Dmitry,

Thank you for the patch.

On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 10:42:31AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> In some cases it's very useful to silently check whether port node exists
> at all in a device-tree before proceeding with parsing the graph. The DRM
> bridges code is one example of such case where absence of a graph in a
> device-tree is a legit condition.
> 
> This patch adds of_graph_is_present() which returns true if given
> device-tree node contains OF graph port.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>

> ---
>  drivers/of/property.c    | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/of_graph.h |  6 ++++++
>  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/of/property.c b/drivers/of/property.c
> index 6a5760f0d6cd..fed7229d9d9f 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/property.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/property.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,29 @@
>  
>  #include "of_private.h"
>  
> +/**
> + * of_graph_is_present() - check graph's presence
> + * @node: pointer to device_node containing graph port
> + *
> + * Return: True if @node has a port or ports (with a port) sub-node,
> + * false otherwise.
> + */
> +bool of_graph_is_present(const struct device_node *node)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *ports, *port;
> +
> +	ports = of_get_child_by_name(node, "ports");
> +	if (ports)
> +		node = ports;
> +
> +	port = of_get_child_by_name(node, "port");
> +	of_node_put(ports);
> +	of_node_put(port);
> +
> +	return !!port;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_graph_is_present);
> +
>  /**
>   * of_property_count_elems_of_size - Count the number of elements in a property
>   *
> diff --git a/include/linux/of_graph.h b/include/linux/of_graph.h
> index 01038a6aade0..4d7756087b6b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/of_graph.h
> +++ b/include/linux/of_graph.h
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ struct of_endpoint {
>  	     child = of_graph_get_next_endpoint(parent, child))
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> +bool of_graph_is_present(const struct device_node *node);
>  int of_graph_parse_endpoint(const struct device_node *node,
>  				struct of_endpoint *endpoint);
>  int of_graph_get_endpoint_count(const struct device_node *np);
> @@ -56,6 +57,11 @@ struct device_node *of_graph_get_remote_node(const struct device_node *node,
>  					     u32 port, u32 endpoint);
>  #else
>  
> +static inline bool of_graph_is_present(const struct device_node *node)
> +{
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
>  static inline int of_graph_parse_endpoint(const struct device_node *node,
>  					struct of_endpoint *endpoint)
>  {

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-07-01  7:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-01  7:42 [PATCH v10 0/2] Silence missing-graph error for DRM bridges Dmitry Osipenko
2020-07-01  7:42 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2020-07-01  7:42 ` Dmitry Osipenko
     [not found] ` <20200701074232.13632-1-digetx-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2020-07-01  7:42   ` [PATCH v10 1/2] of_graph: add of_graph_is_present() Dmitry Osipenko
2020-07-01  7:42     ` Dmitry Osipenko
2020-07-01  7:42     ` Dmitry Osipenko
     [not found]     ` <20200701074232.13632-2-digetx-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2020-07-01  7:55       ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2020-07-01  7:55         ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-07-01  7:55         ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-07-01  7:42   ` [PATCH v10 2/2] drm/of: Make drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge() to check graph's presence Dmitry Osipenko
2020-07-01  7:42     ` Dmitry Osipenko
2020-07-01  7:42     ` Dmitry Osipenko
2020-07-01  9:02   ` [PATCH v10 0/2] Silence missing-graph error for DRM bridges Sam Ravnborg
2020-07-01  9:02     ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-07-01  9:02     ` Sam Ravnborg
     [not found]     ` <20200701090240.GA22218-uyr5N9Q2VtJg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
2020-07-01  9:31       ` Dmitry Osipenko
2020-07-01  9:31         ` Dmitry Osipenko
2020-07-01  9:31         ` Dmitry Osipenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200701075552.GJ5963@pendragon.ideasonboard.com \
    --to=laurent.pinchart-rylnwiuwjnjg/c1bvhzhaw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=digetx-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=frowand.list-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=sam-uyr5N9Q2VtJg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.