From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH RFC 2/5] f2fs: record average update time of segment
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 09:19:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200701161927.GD1724572@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200630100428.19105-2-yuchao0@huawei.com>
On 06/30, Chao Yu wrote:
> Previously, once we update one block in segment, we will update mtime of
> segment to last time, making aged segment becoming freshest, result in
> that GC with cost benefit algorithm missing such segment, So this patch
> changes to record mtime as average block updating time instead of last
> updating time.
>
> It's not needed to reset mtime for prefree segment, as se->valid_blocks
> is zero, then old se->mtime won't take any weight with below calculation:
>
> se->mtime = (se->mtime * se->valid_blocks + mtime) /
> (se->valid_blocks + 1);
>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/segment.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> index 863ec6f1fb87..906c313835ad 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> @@ -2150,6 +2150,22 @@ static void __set_sit_entry_type(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int type,
> __mark_sit_entry_dirty(sbi, segno);
> }
>
> +static void update_segment_mtime(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t blkaddr)
> +{
> + unsigned int segno = GET_SEGNO(sbi, blkaddr);
> + struct seg_entry *se = get_seg_entry(sbi, segno);
> + unsigned long long mtime = get_mtime(sbi, false);
> +
> + if (!se->mtime) {
Don't need {}.
> + se->mtime = mtime;
> + } else {
> + se->mtime = (se->mtime * se->valid_blocks + mtime) /
> + (se->valid_blocks + 1);
> + }
> + if (mtime > SIT_I(sbi)->max_mtime)
> + SIT_I(sbi)->max_mtime = mtime;
> +}
> +
> static void update_sit_entry(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t blkaddr, int del)
> {
> struct seg_entry *se;
> @@ -2169,10 +2185,9 @@ static void update_sit_entry(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t blkaddr, int del)
> f2fs_bug_on(sbi, (new_vblocks >> (sizeof(unsigned short) << 3) ||
> (new_vblocks > sbi->blocks_per_seg)));
>
> + update_segment_mtime(sbi, blkaddr);
> +
> se->valid_blocks = new_vblocks;
> - se->mtime = get_mtime(sbi, false);
> - if (se->mtime > SIT_I(sbi)->max_mtime)
> - SIT_I(sbi)->max_mtime = se->mtime;
>
> /* Update valid block bitmap */
> if (del > 0) {
> --
> 2.26.2
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chao@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/5] f2fs: record average update time of segment
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 09:19:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200701161927.GD1724572@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200630100428.19105-2-yuchao0@huawei.com>
On 06/30, Chao Yu wrote:
> Previously, once we update one block in segment, we will update mtime of
> segment to last time, making aged segment becoming freshest, result in
> that GC with cost benefit algorithm missing such segment, So this patch
> changes to record mtime as average block updating time instead of last
> updating time.
>
> It's not needed to reset mtime for prefree segment, as se->valid_blocks
> is zero, then old se->mtime won't take any weight with below calculation:
>
> se->mtime = (se->mtime * se->valid_blocks + mtime) /
> (se->valid_blocks + 1);
>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/segment.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> index 863ec6f1fb87..906c313835ad 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> @@ -2150,6 +2150,22 @@ static void __set_sit_entry_type(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int type,
> __mark_sit_entry_dirty(sbi, segno);
> }
>
> +static void update_segment_mtime(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t blkaddr)
> +{
> + unsigned int segno = GET_SEGNO(sbi, blkaddr);
> + struct seg_entry *se = get_seg_entry(sbi, segno);
> + unsigned long long mtime = get_mtime(sbi, false);
> +
> + if (!se->mtime) {
Don't need {}.
> + se->mtime = mtime;
> + } else {
> + se->mtime = (se->mtime * se->valid_blocks + mtime) /
> + (se->valid_blocks + 1);
> + }
> + if (mtime > SIT_I(sbi)->max_mtime)
> + SIT_I(sbi)->max_mtime = mtime;
> +}
> +
> static void update_sit_entry(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t blkaddr, int del)
> {
> struct seg_entry *se;
> @@ -2169,10 +2185,9 @@ static void update_sit_entry(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t blkaddr, int del)
> f2fs_bug_on(sbi, (new_vblocks >> (sizeof(unsigned short) << 3) ||
> (new_vblocks > sbi->blocks_per_seg)));
>
> + update_segment_mtime(sbi, blkaddr);
> +
> se->valid_blocks = new_vblocks;
> - se->mtime = get_mtime(sbi, false);
> - if (se->mtime > SIT_I(sbi)->max_mtime)
> - SIT_I(sbi)->max_mtime = se->mtime;
>
> /* Update valid block bitmap */
> if (del > 0) {
> --
> 2.26.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-01 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-30 10:04 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH RFC 1/5] f2fs: introduce inmem curseg Chao Yu
2020-06-30 10:04 ` Chao Yu
2020-06-30 10:04 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH RFC 2/5] f2fs: record average update time of segment Chao Yu
2020-06-30 10:04 ` Chao Yu
2020-07-01 16:19 ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2020-07-01 16:19 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2020-07-03 2:13 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2020-07-03 2:13 ` Chao Yu
2020-06-30 10:04 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH RFC 3/5] f2fs: inherit mtime of original block during GC Chao Yu
2020-06-30 10:04 ` Chao Yu
2020-06-30 10:04 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH RFC 4/5] f2fs: support 64-bits key in f2fs rb-tree node entry Chao Yu
2020-06-30 10:04 ` Chao Yu
2020-06-30 10:04 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH RFC 5/5] f2fs: support age threshold based garbage collection Chao Yu
2020-06-30 10:04 ` Chao Yu
2020-07-06 8:25 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2020-07-06 8:25 ` Chao Yu
2020-07-07 3:21 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH RFC 1/5] f2fs: introduce inmem curseg Jaegeuk Kim
2020-07-07 3:21 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2020-07-07 3:37 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2020-07-07 3:37 ` Chao Yu
2020-07-07 3:51 ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim
2020-07-07 3:51 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2020-07-15 3:39 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2020-07-15 3:39 ` Chao Yu
2020-07-15 19:07 ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim
2020-07-15 19:07 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2020-07-16 1:24 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2020-07-16 1:24 ` Chao Yu
2020-07-25 8:42 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2020-07-25 8:42 ` Chao Yu
2020-08-04 1:49 ` Chao Yu
2020-08-04 1:49 ` Chao Yu
2020-08-04 2:44 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2020-08-04 2:44 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2020-08-04 2:53 ` Chao Yu
2020-08-04 2:53 ` Chao Yu
2020-08-04 3:56 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2020-08-04 3:56 ` Jaegeuk Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200701161927.GD1724572@google.com \
--to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yuchao0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.