[MPTCP] Re: Weekly meeting - 25 June 2020 16:00 UTC (9am PDT, 6pm CEST)

[Geliang Tang <geliangtang at gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2445 bytes --]

Hi Matt,

On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 06:17:14PM +0200, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
> Hi Geliang,
> 
> On 26/06/2020 02:40, Geliang Tang wrote:
> > Hi Matt,
> > 
> > There are several questions I didn't answer clearly in the last meeting.
> > Here I try to write them down:
> 
> Thank you for the clarification!
> 
> > 1 My name pronunciation
> > Geliang Tang sounds like Glenn Town.
> 
> Thank you, that's helpful!
> 
> > 2 My ideal meeting time
> > Every hour from 11am to 6pm (my location time-zone) at every working day
> > is fine to me to attend the meeting.
> 
> I just sent another email now that I am back to work. Did you see it?
> I guess you subscribed to the ML but just in case: https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/mptcp(a)lists.01.org/thread/SHULDCJUWQJX7CWUH6N66MFTRW6TAODS/
> 
> The best would be to have a single meeting, once per week where everybody
> can join. But it would always be difficult for people of some time zones...
> I know it is very late and not in the working hours but do you think having
> the meeting one hour sooner (11pm your time) would be OK for you? Maybe not
> every week of course. Don't be afraid to say no!
> 

11pm is fine to me. Hope it is not too early to other people.

-Geliang

> An alternative would be to organise other meetings with less people.
> But sadly, I don't see other possibilities. Feel free to share if any!
> 
> > 3 What would you like to work on?
> > I'm interested in the BPF topic in the last meeting. But I don't have
> > any idea about this at the moment. Can you please give me more detail
> > about it and I'll spend some time to learn it.
> 
> At the last meeting, we discussed about BPF because a new dev asked to work
> on this subject. He is for the moment looking at having the possibility to
> set in BPF some socket options per subflow.
> 
> Maybe later, he might look at adding BPF_CGROUP_SOCKET to allow per-cgroup
> override of proto in the socket() call. More details in
> https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/issues/18
> 
> But still in BPF, it would be good to look at other stuffs like modifying
> the behaviour of the Path Manager or the Scheduler with BPF.
> Some works were done in a fork of the out-of-tree kernel, maybe it can help:
> https://dial.uclouvain.be/pr/boreal/object/boreal:225610
> 
> Cheers,
> Matt
> -- 
> Tessares | Belgium | Hybrid Access Solutions
> www.tessares.net