* [MPTCP] Re: Weekly meeting - 25 June 2020 16:00 UTC (9am PDT, 6pm CEST)
@ 2020-06-26 0:40 Geliang Tang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Geliang Tang @ 2020-06-26 0:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mptcp
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1135 bytes --]
Hi Matt,
There are several questions I didn't answer clearly in the last meeting.
Here I try to write them down:
1 My name pronunciation
Geliang Tang sounds like Glenn Town.
2 My ideal meeting time
Every hour from 11am to 6pm (my location time-zone) at every working day is
fine to me to attend the meeting.
3 What would you like to work on?
I'm interested in the BPF topic in the last meeting. But I don't have any
idea about this at the moment. Can you please give me more detail about it
and I'll spend some time to learn it.
-Geliang
在 2020年6月24日星期三,Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts(a)tessares.net> 写道:
> Hello everybody!
>
> Our public MPTCP upstreaming weekly web conference is scheduled for
> tomorrow.
>
> The list of topics is available here:
> https://annuel2.framapad.org/p/mptcp_upstreaming_20200625
>
> Feel free to add/modify topics!
>
> Anybody can join the meeting using Google Meet website/app/phone:
> https://meet.google.com/edk-rkrk-vaj
>
> Speak to you tomorrow!
> Matt
> --
> Tessares | Belgium | Hybrid Access Solutions
> www.tessares.net
>
[-- Attachment #2: attachment.htm --]
[-- Type: text/html, Size: 1721 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [MPTCP] Re: Weekly meeting - 25 June 2020 16:00 UTC (9am PDT, 6pm CEST)
@ 2020-07-01 16:17 Matthieu Baerts
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Matthieu Baerts @ 2020-07-01 16:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mptcp
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2197 bytes --]
Hi Geliang,
On 26/06/2020 02:40, Geliang Tang wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> There are several questions I didn't answer clearly in the last meeting.
> Here I try to write them down:
Thank you for the clarification!
> 1 My name pronunciation
> Geliang Tang sounds like Glenn Town.
Thank you, that's helpful!
> 2 My ideal meeting time
> Every hour from 11am to 6pm (my location time-zone) at every working day
> is fine to me to attend the meeting.
I just sent another email now that I am back to work. Did you see it?
I guess you subscribed to the ML but just in case:
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/mptcp(a)lists.01.org/thread/SHULDCJUWQJX7CWUH6N66MFTRW6TAODS/
The best would be to have a single meeting, once per week where
everybody can join. But it would always be difficult for people of some
time zones...
I know it is very late and not in the working hours but do you think
having the meeting one hour sooner (11pm your time) would be OK for you?
Maybe not every week of course. Don't be afraid to say no!
An alternative would be to organise other meetings with less people.
But sadly, I don't see other possibilities. Feel free to share if any!
> 3 What would you like to work on?
> I'm interested in the BPF topic in the last meeting. But I don't have
> any idea about this at the moment. Can you please give me more detail
> about it and I'll spend some time to learn it.
At the last meeting, we discussed about BPF because a new dev asked to
work on this subject. He is for the moment looking at having the
possibility to set in BPF some socket options per subflow.
Maybe later, he might look at adding BPF_CGROUP_SOCKET to allow
per-cgroup override of proto in the socket() call. More details in
https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/issues/18
But still in BPF, it would be good to look at other stuffs like
modifying the behaviour of the Path Manager or the Scheduler with BPF.
Some works were done in a fork of the out-of-tree kernel, maybe it can
help: https://dial.uclouvain.be/pr/boreal/object/boreal:225610
Cheers,
Matt
--
Tessares | Belgium | Hybrid Access Solutions
www.tessares.net
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [MPTCP] Re: Weekly meeting - 25 June 2020 16:00 UTC (9am PDT, 6pm CEST)
@ 2020-07-02 5:31 Geliang Tang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Geliang Tang @ 2020-07-02 5:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mptcp
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2445 bytes --]
Hi Matt,
On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 06:17:14PM +0200, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
> Hi Geliang,
>
> On 26/06/2020 02:40, Geliang Tang wrote:
> > Hi Matt,
> >
> > There are several questions I didn't answer clearly in the last meeting.
> > Here I try to write them down:
>
> Thank you for the clarification!
>
> > 1 My name pronunciation
> > Geliang Tang sounds like Glenn Town.
>
> Thank you, that's helpful!
>
> > 2 My ideal meeting time
> > Every hour from 11am to 6pm (my location time-zone) at every working day
> > is fine to me to attend the meeting.
>
> I just sent another email now that I am back to work. Did you see it?
> I guess you subscribed to the ML but just in case: https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/mptcp(a)lists.01.org/thread/SHULDCJUWQJX7CWUH6N66MFTRW6TAODS/
>
> The best would be to have a single meeting, once per week where everybody
> can join. But it would always be difficult for people of some time zones...
> I know it is very late and not in the working hours but do you think having
> the meeting one hour sooner (11pm your time) would be OK for you? Maybe not
> every week of course. Don't be afraid to say no!
>
11pm is fine to me. Hope it is not too early to other people.
-Geliang
> An alternative would be to organise other meetings with less people.
> But sadly, I don't see other possibilities. Feel free to share if any!
>
> > 3 What would you like to work on?
> > I'm interested in the BPF topic in the last meeting. But I don't have
> > any idea about this at the moment. Can you please give me more detail
> > about it and I'll spend some time to learn it.
>
> At the last meeting, we discussed about BPF because a new dev asked to work
> on this subject. He is for the moment looking at having the possibility to
> set in BPF some socket options per subflow.
>
> Maybe later, he might look at adding BPF_CGROUP_SOCKET to allow per-cgroup
> override of proto in the socket() call. More details in
> https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/issues/18
>
> But still in BPF, it would be good to look at other stuffs like modifying
> the behaviour of the Path Manager or the Scheduler with BPF.
> Some works were done in a fork of the out-of-tree kernel, maybe it can help:
> https://dial.uclouvain.be/pr/boreal/object/boreal:225610
>
> Cheers,
> Matt
> --
> Tessares | Belgium | Hybrid Access Solutions
> www.tessares.net
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [MPTCP] Re: Weekly meeting - 25 June 2020 16:00 UTC (9am PDT, 6pm CEST)
@ 2020-07-02 8:08 Matthieu Baerts
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Matthieu Baerts @ 2020-07-02 8:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mptcp
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1859 bytes --]
Hi Geliang,
On 02/07/2020 07:31, Geliang Tang wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 06:17:14PM +0200, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
>> Hi Geliang,
>>
>> On 26/06/2020 02:40, Geliang Tang wrote:
>>> Hi Matt,
>>>
>>> There are several questions I didn't answer clearly in the last meeting.
>>> Here I try to write them down:
>>
>> Thank you for the clarification!
>>
>>> 1 My name pronunciation
>>> Geliang Tang sounds like Glenn Town.
>>
>> Thank you, that's helpful!
>>
>>> 2 My ideal meeting time
>>> Every hour from 11am to 6pm (my location time-zone) at every working day
>>> is fine to me to attend the meeting.
>>
>> I just sent another email now that I am back to work. Did you see it?
>> I guess you subscribed to the ML but just in case: https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/mptcp(a)lists.01.org/thread/SHULDCJUWQJX7CWUH6N66MFTRW6TAODS/
>>
>> The best would be to have a single meeting, once per week where everybody
>> can join. But it would always be difficult for people of some time zones...
>> I know it is very late and not in the working hours but do you think having
>> the meeting one hour sooner (11pm your time) would be OK for you? Maybe not
>> every week of course. Don't be afraid to say no!
>>
>
> 11pm is fine to me. Hope it is not too early to other people.
Thank you for your reply!
Great, thank you being available that late, that will be easier with
only one meeting! Because I didn't receive answers from everybody and
people in the US are likely sleeping now, I propose to keep the meeting
this evening at the same time as last week. Sorry for that, do not feel
forced to join if it is too late for you!
If it is OK with everybody, the next meeting would be scheduled one hour
sooner.
Cheers,
Matt
--
Tessares | Belgium | Hybrid Access Solutions
www.tessares.net
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-07-02 8:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-07-02 5:31 [MPTCP] Re: Weekly meeting - 25 June 2020 16:00 UTC (9am PDT, 6pm CEST) Geliang Tang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-07-02 8:08 Matthieu Baerts
2020-07-01 16:17 Matthieu Baerts
2020-06-26 0:40 Geliang Tang
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.