Re: [PATCH 3/4] hw/arm/virt-acpi-build: Only expose flash on older machine types

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 11:16:03AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Jul 2020 at 10:53, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 04:09:37PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > > The flash device is exclusively for the host-controlled firmware, so
> > > we should not expose it to the OS. Exposing it risks the OS messing
> > > with it, which could break firmware runtime services and surprise the
> > > OS when all its changes disappear after reboot.
> > >
> > > As firmware needs the device and uses DT, we leave the device exposed
> > > there. It's up to firmware to remove the nodes from DT before sending
> > > it on to the OS. However, there's no need to force firmware to remove
> > > tables from ACPI (which it doesn't know how to do anyway), so we
> > > simply don't add the tables in the first place. But, as we've been
> > > adding the tables for quite some time and don't want to change the
> > > default hardware exposed to versioned machines, then we only stop
> > > exposing the flash device tables for 5.1 and later machine types.
> > >
> > > Suggested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@arm.com>
> > > Suggested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
> >
> > So who's merging this? Mostly ACPI things so I guess my tree?
> > If so can I get acks from ARM maintainers pls?
> 
> This is on my to-look-at queue but in theory I'm on holiday this week :-)
> 
> -- PMM

I picked up patch 1 for now :)

-- 
MST