From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>, LTP List <ltp@lists.linux.it>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org,
Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>, chrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
linux- stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH] crypto: af_alg - Fix regression on empty requests
Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2020 13:35:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200703133558.GX4332@42.do-not-panic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200702033221.GA19367@gondor.apana.org.au>
On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 01:32:21PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 02:18:11PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> >
> > Since we are on this subject,
> > LTP af_alg02 test case fails on stable 4.9 and stable 4.4
> > This is not a regression because the test case has been failing from
> > the beginning.
> >
> > Is this test case expected to fail on stable 4.9 and 4.4 ?
> > or any chance to fix this on these older branches ?
> >
> > Test output:
> > af_alg02.c:52: BROK: Timed out while reading from request socket.
> >
> > ref:
> > https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.9-oe/build/v4.9.228-191-g082e807235d7/testrun/2884917/suite/ltp-crypto-tests/test/af_alg02/history/
> > https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.9-oe/build/v4.9.228-191-g082e807235d7/testrun/2884606/suite/ltp-crypto-tests/test/af_alg02/log
>
> Actually this test really is broken.
FWIW the patch "umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used" was
dropped from linux-next for now as it was missing checking for signals.
I'll be open coding iall checks for each UMH_WAIT_PROC callers next. Its
not clear if this was the issue with this test case, but figured I'd let
you know.
Luis
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>, LTP List <ltp@lists.linux.it>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org,
Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>, chrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
linux- stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH] crypto: af_alg - Fix regression on empty requests
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 13:35:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200703133558.GX4332@42.do-not-panic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200702033221.GA19367@gondor.apana.org.au>
On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 01:32:21PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 02:18:11PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> >
> > Since we are on this subject,
> > LTP af_alg02 test case fails on stable 4.9 and stable 4.4
> > This is not a regression because the test case has been failing from
> > the beginning.
> >
> > Is this test case expected to fail on stable 4.9 and 4.4 ?
> > or any chance to fix this on these older branches ?
> >
> > Test output:
> > af_alg02.c:52: BROK: Timed out while reading from request socket.
> >
> > ref:
> > https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.9-oe/build/v4.9.228-191-g082e807235d7/testrun/2884917/suite/ltp-crypto-tests/test/af_alg02/history/
> > https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.9-oe/build/v4.9.228-191-g082e807235d7/testrun/2884606/suite/ltp-crypto-tests/test/af_alg02/log
>
> Actually this test really is broken.
FWIW the patch "umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used" was
dropped from linux-next for now as it was missing checking for signals.
I'll be open coding iall checks for each UMH_WAIT_PROC callers next. Its
not clear if this was the issue with this test case, but figured I'd let
you know.
Luis
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [v2 PATCH] crypto: af_alg - Fix regression on empty requests
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 13:35:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200703133558.GX4332@42.do-not-panic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200702033221.GA19367@gondor.apana.org.au>
On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 01:32:21PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 02:18:11PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> >
> > Since we are on this subject,
> > LTP af_alg02 test case fails on stable 4.9 and stable 4.4
> > This is not a regression because the test case has been failing from
> > the beginning.
> >
> > Is this test case expected to fail on stable 4.9 and 4.4 ?
> > or any chance to fix this on these older branches ?
> >
> > Test output:
> > af_alg02.c:52: BROK: Timed out while reading from request socket.
> >
> > ref:
> > https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.9-oe/build/v4.9.228-191-g082e807235d7/testrun/2884917/suite/ltp-crypto-tests/test/af_alg02/history/
> > https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.9-oe/build/v4.9.228-191-g082e807235d7/testrun/2884606/suite/ltp-crypto-tests/test/af_alg02/log
>
> Actually this test really is broken.
FWIW the patch "umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used" was
dropped from linux-next for now as it was missing checking for signals.
I'll be open coding iall checks for each UMH_WAIT_PROC callers next. Its
not clear if this was the issue with this test case, but figured I'd let
you know.
Luis
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
chrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>, linux- stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>, LTP List <ltp@lists.linux.it>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH] crypto: af_alg - Fix regression on empty requests
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 13:35:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200703133558.GX4332@42.do-not-panic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200702033221.GA19367@gondor.apana.org.au>
On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 01:32:21PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 02:18:11PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> >
> > Since we are on this subject,
> > LTP af_alg02 test case fails on stable 4.9 and stable 4.4
> > This is not a regression because the test case has been failing from
> > the beginning.
> >
> > Is this test case expected to fail on stable 4.9 and 4.4 ?
> > or any chance to fix this on these older branches ?
> >
> > Test output:
> > af_alg02.c:52: BROK: Timed out while reading from request socket.
> >
> > ref:
> > https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.9-oe/build/v4.9.228-191-g082e807235d7/testrun/2884917/suite/ltp-crypto-tests/test/af_alg02/history/
> > https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.9-oe/build/v4.9.228-191-g082e807235d7/testrun/2884606/suite/ltp-crypto-tests/test/af_alg02/log
>
> Actually this test really is broken.
FWIW the patch "umh: fix processed error when UMH_WAIT_PROC is used" was
dropped from linux-next for now as it was missing checking for signals.
I'll be open coding iall checks for each UMH_WAIT_PROC callers next. Its
not clear if this was the issue with this test case, but figured I'd let
you know.
Luis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-03 13:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-22 18:34 LTP: crypto: af_alg02 regression on linux-next 20200621 tag Naresh Kamboju
2020-06-22 18:46 ` Naresh Kamboju
2020-06-22 18:34 ` [LTP] " Naresh Kamboju
2020-06-22 22:49 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-22 22:49 ` [LTP] " Luis Chamberlain
2020-06-23 6:23 ` Naresh Kamboju
2020-06-23 6:35 ` Naresh Kamboju
2020-06-23 6:23 ` [LTP] " Naresh Kamboju
2020-06-23 6:40 ` Herbert Xu
2020-06-23 6:40 ` [LTP] " Herbert Xu
2020-06-23 6:40 ` Herbert Xu
2020-06-23 17:02 ` Eric Biggers
2020-06-23 17:02 ` [LTP] " Eric Biggers
2020-06-23 17:02 ` Eric Biggers
2020-06-24 0:23 ` Herbert Xu
2020-06-24 0:23 ` [LTP] " Herbert Xu
2020-06-24 0:23 ` Herbert Xu
2020-06-26 6:29 ` [PATCH] crypto: af_alg - Fix regression on empty requests Herbert Xu
2020-06-26 6:29 ` Herbert Xu
2020-06-26 6:29 ` [LTP] " Herbert Xu
2020-06-26 6:29 ` Herbert Xu
2020-06-27 8:31 ` Herbert Xu
2020-06-27 8:31 ` Herbert Xu
2020-06-27 8:31 ` [LTP] " Herbert Xu
2020-06-29 8:53 ` [LKP] " Naresh Kamboju
2020-06-29 8:53 ` Naresh Kamboju
2020-06-29 8:53 ` [LTP] [LKP] " Naresh Kamboju
2020-06-30 8:48 ` Naresh Kamboju
2020-06-30 8:48 ` Naresh Kamboju
2020-06-30 8:48 ` Naresh Kamboju
2020-06-30 8:48 ` [LTP] " Naresh Kamboju
2020-07-02 3:32 ` [v2 PATCH] " Herbert Xu
2020-07-02 3:32 ` Herbert Xu
2020-07-02 3:32 ` [LTP] " Herbert Xu
2020-07-02 3:32 ` Herbert Xu
2020-07-03 13:35 ` Luis Chamberlain [this message]
2020-07-03 13:35 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-03 13:35 ` [LTP] " Luis Chamberlain
2020-07-03 13:35 ` Luis Chamberlain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200703133558.GX4332@42.do-not-panic.com \
--to=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=chrubis@suse.cz \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=jstancek@redhat.com \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
--cc=sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.