All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Saheed O. Bolarinwa" <refactormyself@gmail.com>
To: skhan@linuxfoundation.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Bolarinwa Olayemi Saheed <refactormyself@gmail.com>
Subject: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH 1/14 v3] IB/hfi1: Check the return value of pcie_capability_read_*()
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 19:55:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200713175529.29715-1-refactormyself@gmail.com> (raw)

From: Bolarinwa Olayemi Saheed <refactormyself@gmail.com>

On failure pcie_capability_read_dword() sets it's last parameter,
val to 0. In this case dn and up will be 0, so aspm_hw_l1_supported()
will return false.
However, with Patch 14/14, it is possible that val is set to ~0 on
failure. This would introduce a bug because (x & x) == (~0 & x). So with
dn and up being 0x02, a true value is return when the read has actually
failed.

This bug can be avoided if the return value of pcie_capability_read_dword
is checked to confirm success. The behaviour of the function remains
intact.

Check the return value of pcie_capability_read_dword() to ensure success.

Suggested-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn@helgaas.com>
Signed-off-by: Bolarinwa Olayemi Saheed <refactormyself@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/aspm.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/aspm.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/aspm.c
index a3c53be4072c..80d0b3edd983 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/aspm.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/aspm.c
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ static bool aspm_hw_l1_supported(struct hfi1_devdata *dd)
 {
 	struct pci_dev *parent = dd->pcidev->bus->self;
 	u32 up, dn;
+	int ret_up, ret_dn;
 
 	/*
 	 * If the driver does not have access to the upstream component,
@@ -32,14 +33,14 @@ static bool aspm_hw_l1_supported(struct hfi1_devdata *dd)
 	if (!parent)
 		return false;
 
-	pcie_capability_read_dword(dd->pcidev, PCI_EXP_LNKCAP, &dn);
+	ret_dn = pcie_capability_read_dword(dd->pcidev, PCI_EXP_LNKCAP, &dn);
 	dn = ASPM_L1_SUPPORTED(dn);
 
-	pcie_capability_read_dword(parent, PCI_EXP_LNKCAP, &up);
+	ret_up = pcie_capability_read_dword(parent, PCI_EXP_LNKCAP, &up);
 	up = ASPM_L1_SUPPORTED(up);
 
 	/* ASPM works on A-step but is reported as not supported */
-	return (!!dn || is_ax(dd)) && !!up;
+	return !!ret_dn && !!ret_up && (!!dn || is_ax(dd)) && !!up;
 }
 
 /* Set L1 entrance latency for slower entry to L1 */
-- 
2.18.2

_______________________________________________
Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Saheed O. Bolarinwa" <refactormyself@gmail.com>
To: skhan@linuxfoundation.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Bolarinwa Olayemi Saheed <refactormyself@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/14 v3] IB/hfi1: Check the return value of pcie_capability_read_*()
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 19:55:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200713175529.29715-1-refactormyself@gmail.com> (raw)

From: Bolarinwa Olayemi Saheed <refactormyself@gmail.com>

On failure pcie_capability_read_dword() sets it's last parameter,
val to 0. In this case dn and up will be 0, so aspm_hw_l1_supported()
will return false.
However, with Patch 14/14, it is possible that val is set to ~0 on
failure. This would introduce a bug because (x & x) == (~0 & x). So with
dn and up being 0x02, a true value is return when the read has actually
failed.

This bug can be avoided if the return value of pcie_capability_read_dword
is checked to confirm success. The behaviour of the function remains
intact.

Check the return value of pcie_capability_read_dword() to ensure success.

Suggested-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn@helgaas.com>
Signed-off-by: Bolarinwa Olayemi Saheed <refactormyself@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/aspm.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/aspm.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/aspm.c
index a3c53be4072c..80d0b3edd983 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/aspm.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/aspm.c
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ static bool aspm_hw_l1_supported(struct hfi1_devdata *dd)
 {
 	struct pci_dev *parent = dd->pcidev->bus->self;
 	u32 up, dn;
+	int ret_up, ret_dn;
 
 	/*
 	 * If the driver does not have access to the upstream component,
@@ -32,14 +33,14 @@ static bool aspm_hw_l1_supported(struct hfi1_devdata *dd)
 	if (!parent)
 		return false;
 
-	pcie_capability_read_dword(dd->pcidev, PCI_EXP_LNKCAP, &dn);
+	ret_dn = pcie_capability_read_dword(dd->pcidev, PCI_EXP_LNKCAP, &dn);
 	dn = ASPM_L1_SUPPORTED(dn);
 
-	pcie_capability_read_dword(parent, PCI_EXP_LNKCAP, &up);
+	ret_up = pcie_capability_read_dword(parent, PCI_EXP_LNKCAP, &up);
 	up = ASPM_L1_SUPPORTED(up);
 
 	/* ASPM works on A-step but is reported as not supported */
-	return (!!dn || is_ax(dd)) && !!up;
+	return !!ret_dn && !!ret_up && (!!dn || is_ax(dd)) && !!up;
 }
 
 /* Set L1 entrance latency for slower entry to L1 */
-- 
2.18.2


             reply	other threads:[~2020-07-13 16:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-13 17:55 Saheed O. Bolarinwa [this message]
2020-07-13 17:55 ` [PATCH 1/14 v3] IB/hfi1: Check the return value of pcie_capability_read_*() Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-07-13 17:09 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Jason Gunthorpe
2020-07-13 17:09   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-07-13 17:55 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH 3/14 v3] ath9k: " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-07-13 17:55   ` Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-07-20 17:09   ` Kalle Valo
2020-07-20 17:09   ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Kalle Valo
2020-07-13 17:55 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH 4/14 v3] iwlegacy: " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-07-13 17:55   ` Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-07-15 16:47   ` Kalle Valo
2020-07-15 16:47   ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Kalle Valo
2020-07-13 17:55 ` [PATCH 8/14 v3] PCI/ACPI: " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-07-13 17:55   ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-07-14 13:27   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-07-14 13:27     ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-07-13 17:55 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH 12/14 v3] PCI/AER: " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-07-13 17:55   ` Saheed O. Bolarinwa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200713175529.29715-1-refactormyself@gmail.com \
    --to=refactormyself@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.