From: Vaibhav Gupta <vaibhav.varodek@gmail.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: Vaibhav Gupta <vaibhavgupta40@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH v1 2/6] [media] cx23885: use generic power management
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 16:22:59 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200714105259.GA1792@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200714003814.GA292013@bjorn-Precision-5520>
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 07:38:14PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 12:01:51PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > On 29/06/2020 09:36, Vaibhav Gupta wrote:
> >
> > I don't entirely understand this. Wouldn't it be sufficient to just
> > drop the .suspend/.resume assignments here? It is now required for
> > driver.pm to be non-NULL?
> >
> > I'm not up to speed on the changes, but normally you can leave things
> > NULL if you don't support a feature (PM in this case).
>
> I think this patch will break things. Previously, we had:
>
> cx23885_pci_driver.suspend == NULL
> cx23885_pci_driver.resume == NULL
> cx23885_pci_driver.driver.pm == NULL
>
> pci_pm_suspend() looks like:
>
> if (pci_has_legacy_pm_support(pci_dev))
> return pci_legacy_suspend(dev, PMSG_SUSPEND);
>
> if (!pm) {
> pci_pm_default_suspend(pci_dev);
> return 0;
> }
>
> pci_has_legacy_pm_support() was false since drv->suspend and
> drv->resume are both NULL, so we'd take the pci_pm_default_suspend()
> path. After this patch, driver.pm would no longer be NULL, so we'd
> take a different path that is clearly not equivalent.
>
> I think you should do this:
>
> - /* TODO */
> - .suspend = NULL,
> - .resume = NULL,
>
> and leave .driver.pm NULL by not mentioning it at all. That should be
> identical at the object code level since those are the defaults
> anyway.
>
> That almost looks like useless churn, but the point of this patch is
> to remove use of PCI legacy PM (pci_driver.suspend and .resume) so we
> can completely remove that infrastructure from the PCI core, including
> the .suspend and .resume members of struct pci_driver, so we really do
> need to do it.
Okay!
Thanks!
-- Vaibhav Gupta
>
> Bjorn
_______________________________________________
Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vaibhav Gupta <vaibhav.varodek@gmail.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>,
Vaibhav Gupta <vaibhavgupta40@gmail.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
bjorn@helgaas.com, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
skhan@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/6] [media] cx23885: use generic power management
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 16:22:59 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200714105259.GA1792@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200714003814.GA292013@bjorn-Precision-5520>
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 07:38:14PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 12:01:51PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > On 29/06/2020 09:36, Vaibhav Gupta wrote:
> >
> > I don't entirely understand this. Wouldn't it be sufficient to just
> > drop the .suspend/.resume assignments here? It is now required for
> > driver.pm to be non-NULL?
> >
> > I'm not up to speed on the changes, but normally you can leave things
> > NULL if you don't support a feature (PM in this case).
>
> I think this patch will break things. Previously, we had:
>
> cx23885_pci_driver.suspend == NULL
> cx23885_pci_driver.resume == NULL
> cx23885_pci_driver.driver.pm == NULL
>
> pci_pm_suspend() looks like:
>
> if (pci_has_legacy_pm_support(pci_dev))
> return pci_legacy_suspend(dev, PMSG_SUSPEND);
>
> if (!pm) {
> pci_pm_default_suspend(pci_dev);
> return 0;
> }
>
> pci_has_legacy_pm_support() was false since drv->suspend and
> drv->resume are both NULL, so we'd take the pci_pm_default_suspend()
> path. After this patch, driver.pm would no longer be NULL, so we'd
> take a different path that is clearly not equivalent.
>
> I think you should do this:
>
> - /* TODO */
> - .suspend = NULL,
> - .resume = NULL,
>
> and leave .driver.pm NULL by not mentioning it at all. That should be
> identical at the object code level since those are the defaults
> anyway.
>
> That almost looks like useless churn, but the point of this patch is
> to remove use of PCI legacy PM (pci_driver.suspend and .resume) so we
> can completely remove that infrastructure from the PCI core, including
> the .suspend and .resume members of struct pci_driver, so we really do
> need to do it.
Okay!
Thanks!
-- Vaibhav Gupta
>
> Bjorn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-14 10:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-29 7:35 [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH v1 0/6] [media] pci: use generic power management Vaibhav Gupta
2020-06-29 7:35 ` Vaibhav Gupta
2020-06-29 7:35 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH v1 1/6] [media] sta2x11: " Vaibhav Gupta
2020-06-29 7:35 ` Vaibhav Gupta
2020-06-29 7:36 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH v1 2/6] [media] cx23885: " Vaibhav Gupta
2020-06-29 7:36 ` Vaibhav Gupta
2020-07-13 10:01 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Hans Verkuil
2020-07-13 10:01 ` Hans Verkuil
2020-07-14 0:38 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Bjorn Helgaas
2020-07-14 0:38 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-07-14 10:52 ` Vaibhav Gupta [this message]
2020-07-14 10:52 ` Vaibhav Gupta
2020-06-29 7:36 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH v1 3/6] [media] cx25821: " Vaibhav Gupta
2020-06-29 7:36 ` Vaibhav Gupta
2020-07-13 10:03 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Hans Verkuil
2020-07-13 10:03 ` Hans Verkuil
2020-06-29 7:36 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH v1 4/6] [media] cx88: " Vaibhav Gupta
2020-06-29 7:36 ` Vaibhav Gupta
2020-06-29 7:36 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH v1 5/6] [media] meye: " Vaibhav Gupta
2020-06-29 7:36 ` Vaibhav Gupta
2020-06-29 7:36 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH v1 6/6] [media] tw68: " Vaibhav Gupta
2020-06-29 7:36 ` Vaibhav Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200714105259.GA1792@gmail.com \
--to=vaibhav.varodek@gmail.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=vaibhavgupta40@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.