From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Daeho Jeong <daeho43@gmail.com>
Cc: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2] f2fs: change the way of handling range.len in F2FS_IOC_SEC_TRIM_FILE
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 09:42:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200715164220.GC1167@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACOAw_xaS7qB22EPsZvHoC=uPiPtqGMAK5cP4Vk20xO21GQ-Kg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 07:25:13PM +0900, Daeho Jeong wrote:
> Chao,
>
> I can't find fscrypt_zeroout_range_inline_crypt() function. Do you
> mean we need to implement this one for inline encryption?
>
> 2020년 7월 15일 (수) 오후 4:17, Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>님이 작성:
> >
> > On 2020/7/15 14:54, Daeho Jeong wrote:
> > > You mean we can support ZEROOUT option only for encrypted files of
> > > non-multidevice f2fs,
> > > and return -EOPNOTSUPP in the multidevice case, right now?
> >
> > Yes, something like:
> >
> > f2fs_sec_trim_file()
> >
> > if ((range.flags & F2FS_TRIM_FILE_ZEROOUT) &&
> > f2fs_encrypted_file() && f2fs_is_multi_device())
> > return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >
> >
> > f2fs_secure_erase()
> >
> > if (!ret && (flags & F2FS_TRIM_FILE_ZEROOUT)) {
> > if (f2fs_encrypted_file()) {
> > if (fscrypt_inode_uses_fs_layer_crypto)
> > ret = fscrypt_zeroout_range();
> > else
> > ret = fscrypt_zeroout_range_inline_crypt();
> > } else {
> > ret = blkdev_issue_zeroout();
> > }
> > }
fscrypt_zeroout_range_inline_crypt() is being added by
"fscrypt: add inline encryption support", which is queued in the fscrypt tree
(the master branch of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/fscrypt/fscrypt.git).
But that's not actually relevant here because fscrypt_zeroout_range() calls
fscrypt_zeroout_range_inline_crypt() when needed.
Just use fscrypt_zeroout_range().
- Eric
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Daeho Jeong <daeho43@gmail.com>
Cc: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, kernel-team@android.com,
Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2] f2fs: change the way of handling range.len in F2FS_IOC_SEC_TRIM_FILE
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 09:42:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200715164220.GC1167@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACOAw_xaS7qB22EPsZvHoC=uPiPtqGMAK5cP4Vk20xO21GQ-Kg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 07:25:13PM +0900, Daeho Jeong wrote:
> Chao,
>
> I can't find fscrypt_zeroout_range_inline_crypt() function. Do you
> mean we need to implement this one for inline encryption?
>
> 2020년 7월 15일 (수) 오후 4:17, Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>님이 작성:
> >
> > On 2020/7/15 14:54, Daeho Jeong wrote:
> > > You mean we can support ZEROOUT option only for encrypted files of
> > > non-multidevice f2fs,
> > > and return -EOPNOTSUPP in the multidevice case, right now?
> >
> > Yes, something like:
> >
> > f2fs_sec_trim_file()
> >
> > if ((range.flags & F2FS_TRIM_FILE_ZEROOUT) &&
> > f2fs_encrypted_file() && f2fs_is_multi_device())
> > return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >
> >
> > f2fs_secure_erase()
> >
> > if (!ret && (flags & F2FS_TRIM_FILE_ZEROOUT)) {
> > if (f2fs_encrypted_file()) {
> > if (fscrypt_inode_uses_fs_layer_crypto)
> > ret = fscrypt_zeroout_range();
> > else
> > ret = fscrypt_zeroout_range_inline_crypt();
> > } else {
> > ret = blkdev_issue_zeroout();
> > }
> > }
fscrypt_zeroout_range_inline_crypt() is being added by
"fscrypt: add inline encryption support", which is queued in the fscrypt tree
(the master branch of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/fscrypt/fscrypt.git).
But that's not actually relevant here because fscrypt_zeroout_range() calls
fscrypt_zeroout_range_inline_crypt() when needed.
Just use fscrypt_zeroout_range().
- Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-15 16:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-13 3:12 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2] f2fs: change the way of handling range.len in F2FS_IOC_SEC_TRIM_FILE Daeho Jeong
2020-07-13 3:12 ` Daeho Jeong
2020-07-13 18:11 ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim
2020-07-13 18:11 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2020-07-13 23:34 ` [f2fs-dev] " Daeho Jeong
2020-07-13 23:34 ` Daeho Jeong
2020-07-14 12:36 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2020-07-14 12:36 ` Chao Yu
2020-07-15 4:06 ` Daeho Jeong
2020-07-15 4:06 ` Daeho Jeong
2020-07-15 6:16 ` Chao Yu
2020-07-15 6:16 ` Chao Yu
2020-07-15 6:54 ` Daeho Jeong
2020-07-15 6:54 ` Daeho Jeong
2020-07-15 7:17 ` Chao Yu
2020-07-15 7:17 ` Chao Yu
2020-07-15 10:25 ` Daeho Jeong
2020-07-15 10:25 ` Daeho Jeong
2020-07-15 16:42 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2020-07-15 16:42 ` Eric Biggers
2020-07-16 1:04 ` Chao Yu
2020-07-16 1:04 ` Chao Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200715164220.GC1167@sol.localdomain \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=daeho43@gmail.com \
--cc=daehojeong@google.com \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.