All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Helmut Grohne <helmut.grohne@intenta.de>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@microchip.com>,
	Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@microchip.com>,
	Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com>,
	Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: dsa: microchip: look for phy-mode in port nodes
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 12:07:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200716100743.GA3275@laureti-dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200716070000.GA27587@laureti-dev>

On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 09:00:00AM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> I've prepared a patch based one the one-CPU-port assumption. It really
> becomes way simpler that way. I'd like to give it a little more testing
> before sending it.

I'm sorry, but it is not that simple. Testing revealed a fatal flaw.

At the time ksz_switch_register is called, dev->cpu_port is not
necessarily initialized. For ksz8795, it is initialized during detect
and that is fine. For ksz9477, it is initialized in
ksz9477_config_cpu_port, which comes much too late. The ksz9477 driver
actually handles the case where we choose a CPU port and selects it
using dsa_is_cpu_port (which derives this information from the device
tree during dsa_register_switch).

So in ksz_switch_register, I have no good way of knowing which port will
end up being the CPU port. Options include:
 * Replicating the logic from ksz9477_config_cpu_port. I expect that
   doing this would make the driver harder to maintain.
 * Move the cpu_port computation from ksz9477_config_cpu_port to
   ksz9477_switch_detect. I don't think this would work, because we
   presently call detect before dsa_register_switch, which parses the
   device tree. During detect, dsa_is_cpu_port is not usable.
 * Add a function to ksz_common.c that looks up the phy mode for a port
   from the device tree on demand. That way, ksz9477_config_cpu_port
   could call into the common code instead of reading a ksz_device
   property. It would defer parsing the device tree though and it could
   issue the warning multiple times.
 * Stick with my previous patch that stores the phy mode per-port.

Given the above, the last option seems least bad to me. Do you agree?

Helmut

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-16 10:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-17  8:22 net/dsa/microchip: correct placement of dt property phy-mode? Helmut Grohne
2020-06-17 21:18 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-07-14 12:08 ` [PATCH] net: dsa: microchip: look for phy-mode in port nodes Helmut Grohne
2020-07-14 22:27   ` Andrew Lunn
2020-07-15  7:31     ` Helmut Grohne
2020-07-15 13:00       ` Andrew Lunn
2020-07-16  7:00         ` Helmut Grohne
2020-07-16 10:07           ` Helmut Grohne [this message]
2020-08-20  6:03             ` [RESEND PATCH] " Helmut Grohne
2020-08-24 22:37               ` David Miller
2020-09-04  8:14                 ` [PATCH v2] " Helmut Grohne
2020-09-04 12:59                   ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-09-04 13:52                   ` Andrew Lunn
2020-09-07  6:15                     ` Helmut Grohne
2020-09-07 12:55                       ` Andrew Lunn
2020-09-08  8:01                         ` [PATCH v3] " Helmut Grohne
2020-09-10 19:32                           ` David Miller
2020-09-24  8:37                             ` [PATCH] net: dsa: microchip: really " Helmut Grohne
2020-09-25  3:10                               ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200716100743.GA3275@laureti-dev \
    --to=helmut.grohne@intenta.de \
    --cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=ludovic.desroches@microchip.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
    --cc=woojung.huh@microchip.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.