All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
To: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
Cc: mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org,
	nicolas.ferre@microchip.com, ludovic.desroches@microchip.com,
	bbrezillon@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/19] clk: at91: sam9x60-pll: check fcore against ranges
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 11:23:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200717092354.GO3428@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1594812267-6697-7-git-send-email-claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>

On 15/07/2020 14:24:14+0300, Claudiu Beznea wrote:
> According to datasheet the range of 600-1200MHz is for the the

the is repeated here

> frequency generated by the fractional part of the PLL (namely
> Fcorepllck according to datasheet). With this in mind the output
> range of the PLL itself (fractional + div), taking into account
> that the diverder is 8 bits wide, is 600/256-1200Hz=2.3-1200MHz.
> 

divider

> Fixes: a436c2a447e59 ("clk: at91: add sam9x60 PLL driver")
> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/at91/clk-sam9x60-pll.c | 12 +++++++++++-
>  drivers/clk/at91/sam9x60.c         |  2 +-
>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-sam9x60-pll.c b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-sam9x60-pll.c
> index dfb91c190bd1..00f2afd6e9b6 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-sam9x60-pll.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-sam9x60-pll.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,9 @@
>  #define UPLL_DIV		2
>  #define PLL_MUL_MAX		(FIELD_GET(PMC_PLL_CTRL1_MUL_MSK, UINT_MAX) + 1)
>  
> +#define FCORE_MIN		(600000000)
> +#define FCORE_MAX		(1200000000)
> +
>  #define PLL_MAX_ID		1
>  
>  struct sam9x60_pll {
> @@ -169,6 +172,7 @@ static long sam9x60_pll_get_best_div_mul(struct sam9x60_pll *pll,
>  	unsigned long bestdiv = 0;
>  	unsigned long bestmul = 0;
>  	unsigned long bestfrac = 0;
> +	unsigned long long fcore = 0;

maybe it would be best to go for u64 here as this is what you cast into
later.

>  
>  	if (rate < characteristics->output[0].min ||
>  	    rate > characteristics->output[0].max)
> @@ -213,6 +217,11 @@ static long sam9x60_pll_get_best_div_mul(struct sam9x60_pll *pll,
>  				remainder = rate - tmprate;
>  		}
>  
> +		fcore = parent_rate * (tmpmul + 1) +
> +			((u64)parent_rate * tmpfrac >> 22);
> +		if (fcore < FCORE_MIN || fcore > FCORE_MAX)
> +			continue;
> +
>  		/*
>  		 * Compare the remainder with the best remainder found until
>  		 * now and elect a new best multiplier/divider pair if the
> @@ -232,7 +241,8 @@ static long sam9x60_pll_get_best_div_mul(struct sam9x60_pll *pll,
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Check if bestrate is a valid output rate  */
> -	if (bestrate < characteristics->output[0].min ||
> +	if (fcore < FCORE_MIN || fcore > FCORE_MAX ||
> +	    bestrate < characteristics->output[0].min ||
>  	    bestrate > characteristics->output[0].max)
>  		return -ERANGE;
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/sam9x60.c b/drivers/clk/at91/sam9x60.c
> index 3e20aa68259f..633891b98d43 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/at91/sam9x60.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/at91/sam9x60.c
> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ static const struct clk_master_layout sam9x60_master_layout = {
>  };
>  
>  static const struct clk_range plla_outputs[] = {
> -	{ .min = 300000000, .max = 600000000 },
> +	{ .min = 2343750, .max = 1200000000 },
>  };
>  
>  static const struct clk_pll_characteristics plla_characteristics = {
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
To: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
Cc: bbrezillon@kernel.org, sboyd@kernel.org, mturquette@baylibre.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ludovic.desroches@microchip.com,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/19] clk: at91: sam9x60-pll: check fcore against ranges
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 11:23:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200717092354.GO3428@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1594812267-6697-7-git-send-email-claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>

On 15/07/2020 14:24:14+0300, Claudiu Beznea wrote:
> According to datasheet the range of 600-1200MHz is for the the

the is repeated here

> frequency generated by the fractional part of the PLL (namely
> Fcorepllck according to datasheet). With this in mind the output
> range of the PLL itself (fractional + div), taking into account
> that the diverder is 8 bits wide, is 600/256-1200Hz=2.3-1200MHz.
> 

divider

> Fixes: a436c2a447e59 ("clk: at91: add sam9x60 PLL driver")
> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/at91/clk-sam9x60-pll.c | 12 +++++++++++-
>  drivers/clk/at91/sam9x60.c         |  2 +-
>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-sam9x60-pll.c b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-sam9x60-pll.c
> index dfb91c190bd1..00f2afd6e9b6 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-sam9x60-pll.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-sam9x60-pll.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,9 @@
>  #define UPLL_DIV		2
>  #define PLL_MUL_MAX		(FIELD_GET(PMC_PLL_CTRL1_MUL_MSK, UINT_MAX) + 1)
>  
> +#define FCORE_MIN		(600000000)
> +#define FCORE_MAX		(1200000000)
> +
>  #define PLL_MAX_ID		1
>  
>  struct sam9x60_pll {
> @@ -169,6 +172,7 @@ static long sam9x60_pll_get_best_div_mul(struct sam9x60_pll *pll,
>  	unsigned long bestdiv = 0;
>  	unsigned long bestmul = 0;
>  	unsigned long bestfrac = 0;
> +	unsigned long long fcore = 0;

maybe it would be best to go for u64 here as this is what you cast into
later.

>  
>  	if (rate < characteristics->output[0].min ||
>  	    rate > characteristics->output[0].max)
> @@ -213,6 +217,11 @@ static long sam9x60_pll_get_best_div_mul(struct sam9x60_pll *pll,
>  				remainder = rate - tmprate;
>  		}
>  
> +		fcore = parent_rate * (tmpmul + 1) +
> +			((u64)parent_rate * tmpfrac >> 22);
> +		if (fcore < FCORE_MIN || fcore > FCORE_MAX)
> +			continue;
> +
>  		/*
>  		 * Compare the remainder with the best remainder found until
>  		 * now and elect a new best multiplier/divider pair if the
> @@ -232,7 +241,8 @@ static long sam9x60_pll_get_best_div_mul(struct sam9x60_pll *pll,
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Check if bestrate is a valid output rate  */
> -	if (bestrate < characteristics->output[0].min ||
> +	if (fcore < FCORE_MIN || fcore > FCORE_MAX ||
> +	    bestrate < characteristics->output[0].min ||
>  	    bestrate > characteristics->output[0].max)
>  		return -ERANGE;
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/sam9x60.c b/drivers/clk/at91/sam9x60.c
> index 3e20aa68259f..633891b98d43 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/at91/sam9x60.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/at91/sam9x60.c
> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ static const struct clk_master_layout sam9x60_master_layout = {
>  };
>  
>  static const struct clk_range plla_outputs[] = {
> -	{ .min = 300000000, .max = 600000000 },
> +	{ .min = 2343750, .max = 1200000000 },
>  };
>  
>  static const struct clk_pll_characteristics plla_characteristics = {
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-17  9:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-15 11:24 [PATCH 00/19] clk: at91: add sama7g5 clock support Claudiu Beznea
2020-07-15 11:24 ` Claudiu Beznea
2020-07-15 11:24 ` [PATCH 01/19] clk: at91: clk-generated: continue if __clk_determine_rate() returns error Claudiu Beznea
2020-07-15 11:24   ` Claudiu Beznea
2020-07-17  9:09   ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-07-17  9:09     ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-07-15 11:24 ` [PATCH 02/19] clk: at91: clk-generated: check best_rate against ranges Claudiu Beznea
2020-07-15 11:24   ` Claudiu Beznea
2020-07-17  9:10   ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-07-17  9:10     ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-07-15 11:24 ` [PATCH 03/19] clk: at91: clk-sam9x60-pll: fix mul mask Claudiu Beznea
2020-07-15 11:24   ` Claudiu Beznea
2020-07-17  9:11   ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-07-17  9:11     ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-07-15 11:24 ` [PATCH 04/19] clk: at91: sam9x60-pll: use frac when computing pll frequency Claudiu Beznea
2020-07-15 11:24   ` Claudiu Beznea
2020-07-15 11:24 ` [PATCH 05/19] clk: at91: sam9x60-pll: use logical or for range check Claudiu Beznea
2020-07-15 11:24   ` Claudiu Beznea
2020-07-17  9:13   ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-07-17  9:13     ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-07-15 11:24 ` [PATCH 06/19] clk: at91: sam9x60-pll: check fcore against ranges Claudiu Beznea
2020-07-15 11:24   ` Claudiu Beznea
2020-07-17  9:23   ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]
2020-07-17  9:23     ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-07-15 11:24 ` [PATCH 07/19] clk: at91: sam9x60-pll: use frac when setting frequency Claudiu Beznea
2020-07-15 11:24   ` Claudiu Beznea
2020-07-17  9:12   ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-07-17  9:12     ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-07-20 10:34     ` Claudiu.Beznea
2020-07-20 10:34       ` Claudiu.Beznea
2020-07-15 11:24 ` [PATCH 08/19] clk: at91: sam9x60: fix main rc oscillator frequency Claudiu Beznea
2020-07-15 11:24   ` Claudiu Beznea
2020-07-17  9:17   ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-07-17  9:17     ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-07-15 11:24 ` [PATCH 09/19] clk: at91: sckc: register slow_rc with accuracy option Claudiu Beznea
2020-07-15 11:24   ` Claudiu Beznea
2020-07-15 15:39   ` Claudiu.Beznea
2020-07-15 15:39     ` Claudiu.Beznea
2020-07-15 11:24 ` [PATCH 10/19] clk: at91: replace conditional operator with double logical not Claudiu Beznea
2020-07-15 11:24   ` Claudiu Beznea
2020-07-17 15:07   ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-07-17 15:07     ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-07-20 10:36     ` Claudiu.Beznea
2020-07-20 10:36       ` Claudiu.Beznea
2020-07-15 11:24 ` [PATCH 11/19] clk: at91: clk-generated: pass the id of changeable parent at registration Claudiu Beznea
2020-07-15 11:24   ` Claudiu Beznea
2020-07-16 16:57   ` Codrin.Ciubotariu
2020-07-16 16:57     ` Codrin.Ciubotariu
2020-07-15 11:24 ` [PATCH 12/19] clk: at91: clk-generated: add mux_table option Claudiu Beznea
2020-07-15 11:24   ` Claudiu Beznea
2020-07-15 11:24 ` [PATCH 13/19] clk: at91: clk-master: add master clock support for SAMA7G5 Claudiu Beznea
2020-07-15 11:24   ` Claudiu Beznea
2020-07-15 11:24 ` [PATCH 14/19] clk: at91: clk-peripheral: add support for changeable parent rate Claudiu Beznea
2020-07-15 11:24   ` Claudiu Beznea
2020-07-15 11:24 ` [PATCH 15/19] clk: at91: clk-programmable: add mux_table option Claudiu Beznea
2020-07-15 11:24   ` Claudiu Beznea
2020-07-15 11:24 ` [PATCH 16/19] clk: at91: add macro for pll ids mask Claudiu Beznea
2020-07-15 11:24   ` Claudiu Beznea
2020-07-15 11:24 ` [PATCH 17/19] clk: at91: clk-sam9x60-pll: re-factor to support plls with multiple outputs Claudiu Beznea
2020-07-15 11:24   ` Claudiu Beznea
2020-07-15 11:24 ` [PATCH 18/19] clk: at91: clk-utmi: add utmi support for sama7g5 Claudiu Beznea
2020-07-15 11:24   ` Claudiu Beznea
2020-07-15 11:24 ` [PATCH 19/19] clk: at91: sama7g5: add clock " Claudiu Beznea
2020-07-15 11:24   ` Claudiu Beznea

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200717092354.GO3428@piout.net \
    --to=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=bbrezillon@kernel.org \
    --cc=claudiu.beznea@microchip.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ludovic.desroches@microchip.com \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.