From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Peilin Ye <yepeilin.cs@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH v1] usbhid: Fix slab-out-of-bounds write in hiddev_ioctl_usage()
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 10:16:37 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200721071637.GK2571@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200720191656.GA3366@PWN>
For some reason the reply-to header on your email is bogus:
Reply-To: 20200720121257.GJ2571@kadam
"kadam" is a system on my home network.
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 03:16:56PM -0400, Peilin Ye wrote:
> I made some mistakes in the previous e-mail. Please ignore that. There
> are a lot of things going on...Sorry for that.
>
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 03:12:57PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > So another option would be to just add HIDIOCGUSAGE and HIDIOCSUSAGE to
> > the earlier check. That risks breaking userspace. Another option is to
> > just add a check like you did earlier to the HIDIOCGUSAGE case.
> > Probably just do option #2 and resend.
>
> Sure, I will just add the same check to the HIDIOCGUSAGE case for the
> time being. Thank you for the detailed explanation.
>
> Here's what I found after digging a bit further though:
>
> hid_open_report() calls different functions in order to process
> different type of items:
>
> drivers/hid/hid-core.c:1193:
>
> static int (*dispatch_type[])(struct hid_parser *parser,
> struct hid_item *item) = {
> hid_parser_main,
> hid_parser_global,
> hid_parser_local,
> hid_parser_reserved
> };
>
> In this case, hid_parser_main() calls hid_add_field(), which in turn
> calls hid_register_field(), which allocates the `field` object as you
> mentioned:
>
> drivers/hid/hid-core.c:102:
>
> field = kzalloc((sizeof(struct hid_field) +
> usages * sizeof(struct hid_usage) +
> values * sizeof(unsigned)), GFP_KERNEL);
Yeah. And in the caller it does:
drivers/hid/hid-core.c
297 if (!parser->local.usage_index) /* Ignore padding fields */
298 return 0;
299
300 usages = max_t(unsigned, parser->local.usage_index,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
301 parser->global.report_count);
302
303 field = hid_register_field(report, usages, parser->global.report_count);
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
So ->usages is always greater or equal to ->global.report_count.
304 if (!field)
305 return 0;
306
307 field->physical = hid_lookup_collection(parser, HID_COLLECTION_PHYSICAL);
>
> Here, `values` equals to `global.report_count`. See how it is being
> called:
>
> drivers/hid/hid-core.c:303:
>
> field = hid_register_field(report, usages, parser->global.report_count);
>
> In hid_open_report(), `global.report_count` can be set by calling
> hid_parser_global().
>
> However, the syzkaller reproducer made hid_open_report() to call
> hid_parser_main() __before__ `global.report_count` is properly set. It's
> zero. So hid_register_field() allocated `field` with `values` equals to
> zero - No room for value[] at all. I believe this caused the bug.
I don't know if zero is valid or not. I suspect it is valid. We have
no reason to think that it's invalid.
regards,
dan carpenter
_______________________________________________
Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Peilin Ye <yepeilin.cs@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com,
linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH v1] usbhid: Fix slab-out-of-bounds write in hiddev_ioctl_usage()
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 10:16:37 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200721071637.GK2571@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200720191656.GA3366@PWN>
For some reason the reply-to header on your email is bogus:
Reply-To: 20200720121257.GJ2571@kadam
"kadam" is a system on my home network.
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 03:16:56PM -0400, Peilin Ye wrote:
> I made some mistakes in the previous e-mail. Please ignore that. There
> are a lot of things going on...Sorry for that.
>
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 03:12:57PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > So another option would be to just add HIDIOCGUSAGE and HIDIOCSUSAGE to
> > the earlier check. That risks breaking userspace. Another option is to
> > just add a check like you did earlier to the HIDIOCGUSAGE case.
> > Probably just do option #2 and resend.
>
> Sure, I will just add the same check to the HIDIOCGUSAGE case for the
> time being. Thank you for the detailed explanation.
>
> Here's what I found after digging a bit further though:
>
> hid_open_report() calls different functions in order to process
> different type of items:
>
> drivers/hid/hid-core.c:1193:
>
> static int (*dispatch_type[])(struct hid_parser *parser,
> struct hid_item *item) = {
> hid_parser_main,
> hid_parser_global,
> hid_parser_local,
> hid_parser_reserved
> };
>
> In this case, hid_parser_main() calls hid_add_field(), which in turn
> calls hid_register_field(), which allocates the `field` object as you
> mentioned:
>
> drivers/hid/hid-core.c:102:
>
> field = kzalloc((sizeof(struct hid_field) +
> usages * sizeof(struct hid_usage) +
> values * sizeof(unsigned)), GFP_KERNEL);
Yeah. And in the caller it does:
drivers/hid/hid-core.c
297 if (!parser->local.usage_index) /* Ignore padding fields */
298 return 0;
299
300 usages = max_t(unsigned, parser->local.usage_index,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
301 parser->global.report_count);
302
303 field = hid_register_field(report, usages, parser->global.report_count);
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
So ->usages is always greater or equal to ->global.report_count.
304 if (!field)
305 return 0;
306
307 field->physical = hid_lookup_collection(parser, HID_COLLECTION_PHYSICAL);
>
> Here, `values` equals to `global.report_count`. See how it is being
> called:
>
> drivers/hid/hid-core.c:303:
>
> field = hid_register_field(report, usages, parser->global.report_count);
>
> In hid_open_report(), `global.report_count` can be set by calling
> hid_parser_global().
>
> However, the syzkaller reproducer made hid_open_report() to call
> hid_parser_main() __before__ `global.report_count` is properly set. It's
> zero. So hid_register_field() allocated `field` with `values` equals to
> zero - No room for value[] at all. I believe this caused the bug.
I don't know if zero is valid or not. I suspect it is valid. We have
no reason to think that it's invalid.
regards,
dan carpenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-21 7:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-18 23:12 [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH v1] usbhid: Fix slab-out-of-bounds write in hiddev_ioctl_usage() Peilin Ye
2020-07-18 23:12 ` Peilin Ye
2020-07-20 11:54 ` Dan Carpenter
2020-07-20 11:54 ` Dan Carpenter
2020-07-20 12:12 ` Dan Carpenter
2020-07-20 12:12 ` Dan Carpenter
2020-07-20 19:05 ` Peilin Ye
2020-07-20 19:05 ` Peilin Ye
2020-07-20 19:16 ` Peilin Ye
2020-07-20 19:16 ` Peilin Ye
2020-07-21 7:16 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2020-07-21 7:16 ` Dan Carpenter
2020-07-21 8:27 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-07-21 8:27 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-07-21 8:39 ` Dan Carpenter
2020-07-21 8:39 ` Dan Carpenter
2020-07-21 8:39 ` Peilin Ye
2020-07-21 8:39 ` Peilin Ye
2020-07-20 19:52 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH v2] " Peilin Ye
2020-07-20 19:52 ` Peilin Ye
2020-07-23 14:51 ` Dan Carpenter
2020-07-23 14:51 ` Dan Carpenter
2020-07-29 11:37 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH v2 RESEND] " Peilin Ye
2020-07-29 11:37 ` Peilin Ye
2020-07-29 14:35 ` Dan Carpenter
2020-07-29 14:35 ` Dan Carpenter
2020-08-17 10:21 ` Jiri Kosina
2020-08-17 10:21 ` Jiri Kosina
2020-08-18 10:00 ` Peilin Ye
2020-08-18 10:00 ` Peilin Ye
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200721071637.GK2571@kadam \
--to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
--cc=yepeilin.cs@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.