All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>
To: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, timur@kernel.org,
	Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	tiwai@suse.com, lgirdwood@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org,
	festevam@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: fsl-asoc-card: Get "extal" clock rate by clk_get_rate
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 01:37:29 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200810083728.GA7560@Asurada-Nvidia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1597047103-6863-1-git-send-email-shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>

On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 04:11:43PM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> On some platform(.e.g. i.MX8QM MEK), the "extal" clock is different
> with the mclk of codec, then the clock rate is also different.
> So it is better to get clock rate of "extal" rate by clk_get_rate,
> don't reuse the clock rate of mclk.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>
> ---
> changes in v2
> - add defer probe handler
> 
>  sound/soc/fsl/fsl-asoc-card.c | 11 +++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl-asoc-card.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl-asoc-card.c
> index 52adedc03245..32f8f756e6bb 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl-asoc-card.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl-asoc-card.c
> @@ -696,6 +696,17 @@ static int fsl_asoc_card_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  			goto asrc_fail;
>  		}
>  	} else if (of_node_name_eq(cpu_np, "esai")) {
> +		struct clk *esai_clk = clk_get(&cpu_pdev->dev, "extal");
> +
> +		if (!IS_ERR(esai_clk)) {
> +			priv->cpu_priv.sysclk_freq[TX] = clk_get_rate(esai_clk);
> +			priv->cpu_priv.sysclk_freq[RX] = clk_get_rate(esai_clk);

Will it break existing imx-audio-cs42888 on older i.MX platforms?
'cause it overwrites cpu_priv.sysclk_freq[] that are set in "card
configurations" section.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>
To: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, timur@kernel.org,
	Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	tiwai@suse.com, lgirdwood@gmail.com, perex@perex.cz,
	broonie@kernel.org, festevam@gmail.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: fsl-asoc-card: Get "extal" clock rate by clk_get_rate
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 01:37:29 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200810083728.GA7560@Asurada-Nvidia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1597047103-6863-1-git-send-email-shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>

On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 04:11:43PM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> On some platform(.e.g. i.MX8QM MEK), the "extal" clock is different
> with the mclk of codec, then the clock rate is also different.
> So it is better to get clock rate of "extal" rate by clk_get_rate,
> don't reuse the clock rate of mclk.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>
> ---
> changes in v2
> - add defer probe handler
> 
>  sound/soc/fsl/fsl-asoc-card.c | 11 +++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl-asoc-card.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl-asoc-card.c
> index 52adedc03245..32f8f756e6bb 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl-asoc-card.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl-asoc-card.c
> @@ -696,6 +696,17 @@ static int fsl_asoc_card_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  			goto asrc_fail;
>  		}
>  	} else if (of_node_name_eq(cpu_np, "esai")) {
> +		struct clk *esai_clk = clk_get(&cpu_pdev->dev, "extal");
> +
> +		if (!IS_ERR(esai_clk)) {
> +			priv->cpu_priv.sysclk_freq[TX] = clk_get_rate(esai_clk);
> +			priv->cpu_priv.sysclk_freq[RX] = clk_get_rate(esai_clk);

Will it break existing imx-audio-cs42888 on older i.MX platforms?
'cause it overwrites cpu_priv.sysclk_freq[] that are set in "card
configurations" section.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>
To: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>
Cc: timur@kernel.org, Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com, festevam@gmail.com,
	lgirdwood@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org, perex@perex.cz,
	tiwai@suse.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: fsl-asoc-card: Get "extal" clock rate by clk_get_rate
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 01:37:29 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200810083728.GA7560@Asurada-Nvidia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1597047103-6863-1-git-send-email-shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>

On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 04:11:43PM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> On some platform(.e.g. i.MX8QM MEK), the "extal" clock is different
> with the mclk of codec, then the clock rate is also different.
> So it is better to get clock rate of "extal" rate by clk_get_rate,
> don't reuse the clock rate of mclk.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>
> ---
> changes in v2
> - add defer probe handler
> 
>  sound/soc/fsl/fsl-asoc-card.c | 11 +++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl-asoc-card.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl-asoc-card.c
> index 52adedc03245..32f8f756e6bb 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl-asoc-card.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl-asoc-card.c
> @@ -696,6 +696,17 @@ static int fsl_asoc_card_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  			goto asrc_fail;
>  		}
>  	} else if (of_node_name_eq(cpu_np, "esai")) {
> +		struct clk *esai_clk = clk_get(&cpu_pdev->dev, "extal");
> +
> +		if (!IS_ERR(esai_clk)) {
> +			priv->cpu_priv.sysclk_freq[TX] = clk_get_rate(esai_clk);
> +			priv->cpu_priv.sysclk_freq[RX] = clk_get_rate(esai_clk);

Will it break existing imx-audio-cs42888 on older i.MX platforms?
'cause it overwrites cpu_priv.sysclk_freq[] that are set in "card
configurations" section.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-10  8:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-10  8:11 [PATCH v2] ASoC: fsl-asoc-card: Get "extal" clock rate by clk_get_rate Shengjiu Wang
2020-08-10  8:37 ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
2020-08-10  8:37   ` Nicolin Chen
2020-08-10  8:37   ` Nicolin Chen
2020-08-10  8:50   ` Shengjiu Wang
2020-08-10  8:50     ` Shengjiu Wang
2020-08-10 23:13 ` Nicolin Chen
2020-08-10 23:13   ` Nicolin Chen
2020-08-10 23:13   ` Nicolin Chen
2020-08-18 16:54 ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200810083728.GA7560@Asurada-Nvidia \
    --to=nicoleotsuka@gmail.com \
    --cc=Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=shengjiu.wang@nxp.com \
    --cc=timur@kernel.org \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.