All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, lulu@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, eli@mellanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vhost: vdpa: remove per device feature whitelist
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 06:19:07 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200811061840-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200720085043.16485-1-jasowang@redhat.com>

On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 04:50:43PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> We used to have a per device feature whitelist to filter out the
> unsupported virtio features. But this seems unnecessary since:
> 
> - the main idea behind feature whitelist is to block control vq
>   feature until we finalize the control virtqueue API. But the current
>   vhost-vDPA uAPI is sufficient to support control virtqueue. For
>   device that has hardware control virtqueue, the vDPA device driver
>   can just setup the hardware virtqueue and let userspace to use
>   hardware virtqueue directly. For device that doesn't have a control
>   virtqueue, the vDPA device driver need to use e.g vringh to emulate
>   a software control virtqueue.
> - we don't do it in virtio-vDPA driver
> 
> So remove this limitation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>


Thinking about it, should we block some bits?
E.g. access_platform?
they depend on qemu not vdpa ...

> ---
>  drivers/vhost/vdpa.c | 37 -------------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 37 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> index 77a0c9fb6cc3..f7f6ddd681ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> @@ -26,35 +26,6 @@
>  
>  #include "vhost.h"
>  
> -enum {
> -	VHOST_VDPA_FEATURES =
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_F_NOTIFY_ON_EMPTY) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ANY_LAYOUT) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ORDER_PLATFORM) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_RING_F_EVENT_IDX),
> -
> -	VHOST_VDPA_NET_FEATURES = VHOST_VDPA_FEATURES |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_CSUM) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_CSUM) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_MAC) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO4) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO6) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_ECN) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_UFO) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_HOST_TSO4) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_HOST_TSO6) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_HOST_ECN) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_HOST_UFO) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_STATUS) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_SPEED_DUPLEX),
> -};
> -
>  /* Currently, only network backend w/o multiqueue is supported. */
>  #define VHOST_VDPA_VQ_MAX	2
>  
> @@ -79,10 +50,6 @@ static DEFINE_IDA(vhost_vdpa_ida);
>  
>  static dev_t vhost_vdpa_major;
>  
> -static const u64 vhost_vdpa_features[] = {
> -	[VIRTIO_ID_NET] = VHOST_VDPA_NET_FEATURES,
> -};
> -
>  static void handle_vq_kick(struct vhost_work *work)
>  {
>  	struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = container_of(work, struct vhost_virtqueue,
> @@ -255,7 +222,6 @@ static long vhost_vdpa_get_features(struct vhost_vdpa *v, u64 __user *featurep)
>  	u64 features;
>  
>  	features = ops->get_features(vdpa);
> -	features &= vhost_vdpa_features[v->virtio_id];
>  
>  	if (copy_to_user(featurep, &features, sizeof(features)))
>  		return -EFAULT;
> @@ -279,9 +245,6 @@ static long vhost_vdpa_set_features(struct vhost_vdpa *v, u64 __user *featurep)
>  	if (copy_from_user(&features, featurep, sizeof(features)))
>  		return -EFAULT;
>  
> -	if (features & ~vhost_vdpa_features[v->virtio_id])
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -
>  	if (ops->set_features(vdpa, features))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -- 
> 2.20.1

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	eli@mellanox.com, lulu@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vhost: vdpa: remove per device feature whitelist
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 06:19:07 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200811061840-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200720085043.16485-1-jasowang@redhat.com>

On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 04:50:43PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> We used to have a per device feature whitelist to filter out the
> unsupported virtio features. But this seems unnecessary since:
> 
> - the main idea behind feature whitelist is to block control vq
>   feature until we finalize the control virtqueue API. But the current
>   vhost-vDPA uAPI is sufficient to support control virtqueue. For
>   device that has hardware control virtqueue, the vDPA device driver
>   can just setup the hardware virtqueue and let userspace to use
>   hardware virtqueue directly. For device that doesn't have a control
>   virtqueue, the vDPA device driver need to use e.g vringh to emulate
>   a software control virtqueue.
> - we don't do it in virtio-vDPA driver
> 
> So remove this limitation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>


Thinking about it, should we block some bits?
E.g. access_platform?
they depend on qemu not vdpa ...

> ---
>  drivers/vhost/vdpa.c | 37 -------------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 37 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> index 77a0c9fb6cc3..f7f6ddd681ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> @@ -26,35 +26,6 @@
>  
>  #include "vhost.h"
>  
> -enum {
> -	VHOST_VDPA_FEATURES =
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_F_NOTIFY_ON_EMPTY) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ANY_LAYOUT) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ORDER_PLATFORM) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_RING_F_EVENT_IDX),
> -
> -	VHOST_VDPA_NET_FEATURES = VHOST_VDPA_FEATURES |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_CSUM) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_CSUM) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_MAC) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO4) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO6) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_ECN) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_UFO) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_HOST_TSO4) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_HOST_TSO6) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_HOST_ECN) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_HOST_UFO) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_STATUS) |
> -		(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_SPEED_DUPLEX),
> -};
> -
>  /* Currently, only network backend w/o multiqueue is supported. */
>  #define VHOST_VDPA_VQ_MAX	2
>  
> @@ -79,10 +50,6 @@ static DEFINE_IDA(vhost_vdpa_ida);
>  
>  static dev_t vhost_vdpa_major;
>  
> -static const u64 vhost_vdpa_features[] = {
> -	[VIRTIO_ID_NET] = VHOST_VDPA_NET_FEATURES,
> -};
> -
>  static void handle_vq_kick(struct vhost_work *work)
>  {
>  	struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = container_of(work, struct vhost_virtqueue,
> @@ -255,7 +222,6 @@ static long vhost_vdpa_get_features(struct vhost_vdpa *v, u64 __user *featurep)
>  	u64 features;
>  
>  	features = ops->get_features(vdpa);
> -	features &= vhost_vdpa_features[v->virtio_id];
>  
>  	if (copy_to_user(featurep, &features, sizeof(features)))
>  		return -EFAULT;
> @@ -279,9 +245,6 @@ static long vhost_vdpa_set_features(struct vhost_vdpa *v, u64 __user *featurep)
>  	if (copy_from_user(&features, featurep, sizeof(features)))
>  		return -EFAULT;
>  
> -	if (features & ~vhost_vdpa_features[v->virtio_id])
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -
>  	if (ops->set_features(vdpa, features))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -- 
> 2.20.1


  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-11 10:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-20  8:50 [PATCH] vhost: vdpa: remove per device feature whitelist Jason Wang
2020-08-11 10:19 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2020-08-11 10:19   ` Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200811061840-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=eli@mellanox.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lulu@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.