From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Xingxing Su <suxingxing@loongson.cn>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] seqlock: Fix build errors
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 10:35:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200814083552.GE3982@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1597378358-2546-1-git-send-email-suxingxing@loongson.cn>
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 12:12:38PM +0800, Xingxing Su wrote:
> Fix the following build errors:
>
> In file included from ./include/linux/time.h:6:0,
> from ./include/linux/compat.h:10,
> from arch/mips/kernel/asm-offsets.c:12:
> ./include/linux/seqlock.h: In function ‘write_seqcount_begin_nested’:
> ./include/linux/seqlock.h:286:2: error: implicit declaration of function
> ‘raw_smp_processor_id’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> lockdep_assert_preemption_disabled();
> ^
> ./arch/mips/include/asm/smp.h: At top level:
> ./arch/mips/include/asm/smp.h:28:19: error: static declaration of
> ‘raw_smp_processor_id’ follows non-static declaration
> static inline int raw_smp_processor_id(void)
> ^
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> scripts/Makefile.build:117: recipe for target 'arch/mips/kernel/asm-offsets.s' failed
> make[1]: *** [arch/mips/kernel/asm-offsets.s] Error 1
> arch/mips/Makefile:396: recipe for target 'archprepare' failed
> make: *** [archprepare] Error 2
>
What kernel are you building?
Commit 0cd39f4600ed ("locking/seqlock, headers: Untangle the spaghetti monster")
should have solved that I think.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xingxing Su <suxingxing@loongson.cn>
> ---
> v2: update the commit message
>
> include/linux/seqlock.h | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/seqlock.h b/include/linux/seqlock.h
> index 54bc204..4763c13 100644
> --- a/include/linux/seqlock.h
> +++ b/include/linux/seqlock.h
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> #include <linux/lockdep.h>
> #include <linux/compiler.h>
> #include <linux/kcsan-checks.h>
> +#include <linux/smp.h>
> #include <asm/processor.h>
Wrong place, it's lockdep_assert_preemption_disabled() that requires
asm/percpu.h, and thus lockdep.h should include linux/smp. before
asm/percpu.h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-14 8:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-14 4:12 [PATCH v2] seqlock: Fix build errors Xingxing Su
2020-08-14 8:35 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2020-08-14 10:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2020-08-14 10:30 ` Xingxing Su
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200814083552.GE3982@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=suxingxing@loongson.cn \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.