From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
Cc: Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@lip6.fr>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@imag.fr>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>,
Coccinelle <cocci@systeme.lip6.fr>
Subject: Re: [Cocci] [PATCH v2] scripts: coccicheck: Change default value for parallelism
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 15:29:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200814132948.GA62819@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7733e0b3-91f2-0033-75d6-77947253bfeb@web.de>
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 03:06:06PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > a decrease in performance is noted. The elapsed time is minimum
>
> Can the following wording variant be more appropriate?
>
> a decrease was noticed in the software performance. The elapsed time is minimal
>
>
> > respectively for two separate runs. …
>
> Can such information trigger further considerations for benchmarking approaches?
>
> Regards,
> Markus
Hi,
This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.
Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless
review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing
list. I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore. Please do not
bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and
features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time.
Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to
follow it at all. The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by
almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of
behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and
inability to adapt to feedback. Please feel free to also ignore emails
from them.
thanks,
greg k-h's patch email bot
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
Cc: Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@lip6.fr>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@imag.fr>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>,
Coccinelle <cocci@systeme.lip6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scripts: coccicheck: Change default value for parallelism
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 13:29:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200814132948.GA62819@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7733e0b3-91f2-0033-75d6-77947253bfeb@web.de>
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 03:06:06PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > a decrease in performance is noted. The elapsed time is minimum
>
> Can the following wording variant be more appropriate?
>
> a decrease was noticed in the software performance. The elapsed time is minimal
>
>
> > respectively for two separate runs. …
>
> Can such information trigger further considerations for benchmarking approaches?
>
> Regards,
> Markus
Hi,
This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.
Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless
review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing
list. I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore. Please do not
bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and
features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time.
Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to
follow it at all. The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by
almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of
behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and
inability to adapt to feedback. Please feel free to also ignore emails
from them.
thanks,
greg k-h's patch email bot
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
Cc: Sumera Priyadarsini <sylphrenadin@gmail.com>,
Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>,
Coccinelle <cocci@systeme.lip6.fr>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@lip6.fr>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@imag.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scripts: coccicheck: Change default value for parallelism
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 15:29:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200814132948.GA62819@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7733e0b3-91f2-0033-75d6-77947253bfeb@web.de>
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 03:06:06PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > a decrease in performance is noted. The elapsed time is minimum
>
> Can the following wording variant be more appropriate?
>
> a decrease was noticed in the software performance. The elapsed time is minimal
>
>
> > respectively for two separate runs. …
>
> Can such information trigger further considerations for benchmarking approaches?
>
> Regards,
> Markus
Hi,
This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.
Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless
review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing
list. I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore. Please do not
bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and
features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time.
Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to
follow it at all. The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by
almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of
behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and
inability to adapt to feedback. Please feel free to also ignore emails
from them.
thanks,
greg k-h's patch email bot
next parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-14 13:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <7733e0b3-91f2-0033-75d6-77947253bfeb@web.de>
2020-08-14 13:29 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2020-08-14 13:29 ` [PATCH v2] scripts: coccicheck: Change default value for parallelism Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-08-14 13:29 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-08-14 12:45 [Cocci] [PATCH V2] " Sumera Priyadarsini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200814132948.GA62819@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=Gilles.Muller@lip6.fr \
--cc=Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr \
--cc=Markus.Elfring@web.de \
--cc=cocci@systeme.lip6.fr \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.lkml@markovi.net \
--cc=nicolas.palix@imag.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.