All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, ming.lei@redhat.com, hch@lst.de,
	baolin.wang7@gmail.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 3/5] block: Add a new helper to attempt to merge a bio
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 08:26:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200817062634.GC12248@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5b932aa51fc2b46c381d7b83d591a6ddbf05b199.1597637287.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>

On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 12:09:17PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> There are lots of duplicated code when trying to merge a bio from
> plug list and sw queue, we can introduce a new helper to attempt
> to merge a bio, which can simplify the blk_mq_bio_list_merge()
> and blk_attempt_plug_merge().

Looks sensible, but two comments:

> +enum bio_merge_status blk_attempt_bio_merge(struct request_queue *q,
> +					    struct request *rq,
> +					    struct bio *bio,
> +					    unsigned int nr_segs)
> +{
> +	bool merged = false;
> +
> +	if (!blk_rq_merge_ok(rq, bio))
> +		return BIO_MERGE_NONE;
> +
> +	switch (blk_try_merge(rq, bio)) {
> +	case ELEVATOR_BACK_MERGE:
> +		merged = bio_attempt_back_merge(rq, bio, nr_segs);
> +		break;
> +	case ELEVATOR_FRONT_MERGE:
> +		merged = bio_attempt_front_merge(rq, bio, nr_segs);
> +		break;
> +	case ELEVATOR_DISCARD_MERGE:
> +		merged = bio_attempt_discard_merge(q, rq, bio);
> +		break;

Can't we also switch the bio_attempt_*merge helpers to return
enum bio_merge_status to simplify this a bit?

Also I think these helpers can be marked static now, although I didn't
actually apply your series, so I might have missed something.

> +++ b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
> @@ -391,31 +391,17 @@ bool blk_mq_bio_list_merge(struct request_queue *q, struct list_head *list,
>  {
>  	struct request *rq;
>  	int checked = 8;
> +	enum bio_merge_status merge;
>  
>  	list_for_each_entry_reverse(rq, list, queuelist) {
> -		bool merged = false;
> -
>  		if (!checked--)
>  			break;
>  
> +		merge = blk_attempt_bio_merge(q, rq, bio, nr_segs);
> +		if (merge == BIO_MERGE_NONE)
>  			continue;
>  
> +		return merge == BIO_MERGE_OK ? true: false;

Maybe write this a little more explicit:

		switch (blk_attempt_bio_merge(q, rq, bio, nr_segs)) {
		case BIO_MERGE_NONE:
			continue:
		case BIO_MERGE_OK:
			return true;
		case BIO_MERGE_FAILED:
			return false;
		}

>  enum elv_merge blk_try_merge(struct request *rq, struct bio *bio);
>  
> +enum bio_merge_status {
> +	BIO_MERGE_OK,
> +	BIO_MERGE_NONE,
> +	BIO_MERGE_FAILED,
> +};
> +
> +enum bio_merge_status blk_attempt_bio_merge(struct request_queue *q,
> +		struct request *rq, struct bio *bio, unsigned int nr_segs);
> +
>  int blk_dev_init(void);
>  
>  /*
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
---end quoted text---

  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-17  6:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-17  4:09 [PATCH RESEND 0/5] Some clean-ups for bio merge Baolin Wang
2020-08-17  4:09 ` [PATCH RESEND 1/5] block: Move bio merge related functions into blk-merge.c Baolin Wang
2020-08-17  6:15   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-17  4:09 ` [PATCH RESEND 2/5] block: Remove redundant blk_mq_sched_allow_merge() validation Baolin Wang
2020-08-17  6:22   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-17 12:06     ` Baolin Wang
2020-08-17  4:09 ` [PATCH RESEND 3/5] block: Add a new helper to attempt to merge a bio Baolin Wang
2020-08-17  6:26   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2020-08-17 12:10     ` Baolin Wang
2020-08-17 12:24       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-18  3:30         ` Baolin Wang
2020-08-17  7:55   ` kernel test robot
2020-08-17  7:55     ` kernel test robot
2020-08-17  7:55   ` [PATCH] block: fix boolconv.cocci warnings kernel test robot
2020-08-17  7:55     ` kernel test robot
2020-08-17  4:09 ` [PATCH RESEND 4/5] block: Remove blk_mq_attempt_merge() function Baolin Wang
2020-08-17  6:31   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-17 12:10     ` Baolin Wang
2020-08-17  4:09 ` [PATCH RESEND 5/5] block: Remove __blk_mq_sched_bio_merge() helper Baolin Wang
2020-08-17  6:32   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-17 12:14     ` Baolin Wang
2020-08-17 12:26       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-18  3:29         ` Baolin Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200817062634.GC12248@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=baolin.wang7@gmail.com \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.