From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] tpm: add sysfs exports for all banks of PCR registers
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 20:41:17 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200821174117.GB3559@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1597940084.3864.35.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 09:14:44AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-08-19 at 20:21 -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 01:09:16PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2020-08-19 at 14:17 -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 12:57:42PM -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, 2020-08-19 at 13:18 -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > > > > Yes - it was dropped because TPM 2 was a *complete ABI break*
> > > > > > for everything. The kernel was reset to a uABI that matches
> > > > > > current uABI standards starting TPM 2.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The whole userspace needed to be redone anyhow, and certainly
> > > > > > nobody objected at the time.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > At least my expecation was that a sensible userspace for TPM
> > > > > > (for administrator user) would be built, like we see in other
> > > > > > subsystems eg 'ip' for netdev.
> > > > >
> > > > > "Because TPM 2 was a complete ABI break for everything" could
> > > > > be reason for upstreaming a minimal subset of functionality
> > > > > initially, which could be expanded over time. I don't recall a
> > > > > discussion about limting features in the future.
> > > >
> > > > All new uAPI additions need to pass the usual uAPI hurdles.
> > > >
> > > > As James outlined, justify why the kernel must present a
> > > > duplicated uAPI between sysfs and /dev/tpm.
> > > >
> > > > There have been good reasons in the past, eg SCSI inquiry.
> > >
> > > First, can we please agree /dev/tpm does not substitute as a
> > > "duplicate API".
> >
> > Er? Huh? How so?
>
> Because like the SCSI command interface it's a binary marshalled
> protocol we want to abstract for users. We can still argue whether the
> kernel or a toolkit should do the abstraction but it's not one we want
> to dump on users and say "this is it, what do you mean you don't like
> it?"
No we don't. On the contrary, we expose the protocol through /dev/tpm0.
/Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-21 17:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-17 21:35 [PATCH v4 0/1] add sysfs exports for TPM 2 PCR registers James Bottomley
2020-08-17 21:35 ` [PATCH v4 1/1] tpm: add sysfs exports for all banks of " James Bottomley
2020-08-18 16:12 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-08-18 16:19 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-08-18 16:26 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-08-18 16:46 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-08-18 18:26 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-08-18 18:36 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-08-18 18:55 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-08-19 12:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-08-19 13:27 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-08-19 14:09 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-08-19 14:53 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-08-19 14:55 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-08-19 22:16 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-08-19 22:48 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2020-08-19 23:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-08-20 15:46 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-08-19 14:56 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2020-08-19 22:15 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-08-19 15:17 ` James Bottomley
2020-08-19 16:18 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-08-19 16:57 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-08-19 17:17 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-08-19 20:09 ` James Bottomley
2020-08-19 23:21 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-08-20 16:14 ` James Bottomley
2020-08-20 16:55 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2020-08-21 17:41 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2020-08-21 19:38 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-08-24 19:44 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-08-24 20:20 ` James Bottomley
2020-08-25 15:27 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-08-25 15:33 ` James Bottomley
2020-08-26 13:15 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-08-26 13:19 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-08-24 21:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-08-19 22:14 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-08-18 19:03 ` James Bottomley
2020-08-19 22:13 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-08-19 22:01 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-08-18 16:44 ` James Bottomley
2020-08-18 17:17 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-08-18 18:49 ` James Bottomley
2020-08-19 21:53 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-08-19 22:46 ` James Bottomley
2020-08-20 15:22 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-08-19 21:33 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-09-14 17:41 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-09-14 19:19 ` James Bottomley
2020-09-15 11:22 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-10-08 11:45 ` Petr Vorel
2020-10-08 14:29 ` James Bottomley
2020-10-09 16:12 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200821174117.GB3559@linux.intel.com \
--to=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.