From: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
To: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, tee-dev@lists.linaro.org,
soc@kernel.org, arm@kernel.org, olof@lixom.net,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] tee: convert convert get_user_pages() --> pin_user_pages()
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 10:32:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200825083204.GA2068961@jade> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200824211125.1867329-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com>
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 02:11:25PM -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
> This code was using get_user_pages*(), in a "Case 2" scenario
> (DMA/RDMA), using the categorization from [1]. That means that it's
> time to convert the get_user_pages*() + put_page() calls to
> pin_user_pages*() + unpin_user_pages() calls.
>
> Factor out a new, small release_registered_pages() function, in
> order to consolidate the logic for discerning between
> TEE_SHM_USER_MAPPED and TEE_SHM_KERNEL_MAPPED pages. This also
> absorbs the kfree() call that is also required there.
>
> There is some helpful background in [2]: basically, this is a small
> part of fixing a long-standing disconnect between pinning pages, and
> file systems' use of those pages.
>
> [1] Documentation/core-api/pin_user_pages.rst
>
> [2] "Explicit pinning of user-space pages":
> https://lwn.net/Articles/807108/
>
> Cc: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
> Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
> Cc: tee-dev@lists.linaro.org
> Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
> Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
> ---
>
> OK, one more try, this time actually handling the _USER_MAPPED vs.
> _KERNEL_MAPPED pages!
>
> thanks,
> John Hubbard
> NVIDIA
Looks good and it works too! :-) I've tested it on my Hikey board with
the OP-TEE test suite.
I'm picking this up.
Thanks,
Jens
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
To: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, tee-dev@lists.linaro.org,
soc@kernel.org, arm@kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] tee: convert convert get_user_pages() --> pin_user_pages()
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 10:32:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200825083204.GA2068961@jade> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200824211125.1867329-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com>
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 02:11:25PM -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
> This code was using get_user_pages*(), in a "Case 2" scenario
> (DMA/RDMA), using the categorization from [1]. That means that it's
> time to convert the get_user_pages*() + put_page() calls to
> pin_user_pages*() + unpin_user_pages() calls.
>
> Factor out a new, small release_registered_pages() function, in
> order to consolidate the logic for discerning between
> TEE_SHM_USER_MAPPED and TEE_SHM_KERNEL_MAPPED pages. This also
> absorbs the kfree() call that is also required there.
>
> There is some helpful background in [2]: basically, this is a small
> part of fixing a long-standing disconnect between pinning pages, and
> file systems' use of those pages.
>
> [1] Documentation/core-api/pin_user_pages.rst
>
> [2] "Explicit pinning of user-space pages":
> https://lwn.net/Articles/807108/
>
> Cc: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
> Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
> Cc: tee-dev@lists.linaro.org
> Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
> Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
> ---
>
> OK, one more try, this time actually handling the _USER_MAPPED vs.
> _KERNEL_MAPPED pages!
>
> thanks,
> John Hubbard
> NVIDIA
Looks good and it works too! :-) I've tested it on my Hikey board with
the OP-TEE test suite.
I'm picking this up.
Thanks,
Jens
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
To: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: arm@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, olof@lixom.net, soc@kernel.org,
tee-dev@lists.linaro.org, Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] tee: convert convert get_user_pages() --> pin_user_pages()
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 10:32:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200825083204.GA2068961@jade> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200824211125.1867329-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com>
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 02:11:25PM -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
> This code was using get_user_pages*(), in a "Case 2" scenario
> (DMA/RDMA), using the categorization from [1]. That means that it's
> time to convert the get_user_pages*() + put_page() calls to
> pin_user_pages*() + unpin_user_pages() calls.
>
> Factor out a new, small release_registered_pages() function, in
> order to consolidate the logic for discerning between
> TEE_SHM_USER_MAPPED and TEE_SHM_KERNEL_MAPPED pages. This also
> absorbs the kfree() call that is also required there.
>
> There is some helpful background in [2]: basically, this is a small
> part of fixing a long-standing disconnect between pinning pages, and
> file systems' use of those pages.
>
> [1] Documentation/core-api/pin_user_pages.rst
>
> [2] "Explicit pinning of user-space pages":
> https://lwn.net/Articles/807108/
>
> Cc: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
> Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
> Cc: tee-dev@lists.linaro.org
> Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
> Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
> ---
>
> OK, one more try, this time actually handling the _USER_MAPPED vs.
> _KERNEL_MAPPED pages!
>
> thanks,
> John Hubbard
> NVIDIA
Looks good and it works too! :-) I've tested it on my Hikey board with
the OP-TEE test suite.
I'm picking this up.
Thanks,
Jens
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-25 8:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-26 13:12 [GIT PULL] tee subsystem pin_user_pages for v5.8 Jens Wiklander
2020-05-26 13:12 ` Jens Wiklander
2020-08-21 18:49 ` Olof Johansson
2020-08-21 18:49 ` Olof Johansson
2020-08-21 19:58 ` John Hubbard
2020-08-21 19:58 ` John Hubbard
2020-08-21 21:18 ` Olof Johansson
2020-08-21 21:18 ` Olof Johansson
2020-08-24 6:51 ` Jens Wiklander
2020-08-24 6:51 ` Jens Wiklander
2020-08-24 7:18 ` John Hubbard
2020-08-24 7:18 ` John Hubbard
2020-08-24 7:46 ` Jens Wiklander
2020-08-24 7:46 ` Jens Wiklander
2020-08-24 18:36 ` [PATCH v2] tee: convert convert get_user_pages() --> pin_user_pages() John Hubbard
2020-08-24 18:36 ` John Hubbard
2020-08-24 18:36 ` John Hubbard
2020-08-24 18:42 ` John Hubbard
2020-08-24 18:42 ` John Hubbard
2020-08-24 18:42 ` John Hubbard
2020-08-24 21:11 ` [PATCH v3] " John Hubbard
2020-08-24 21:11 ` John Hubbard
2020-08-24 21:11 ` John Hubbard
2020-08-25 8:32 ` Jens Wiklander [this message]
2020-08-25 8:32 ` Jens Wiklander
2020-08-25 8:32 ` Jens Wiklander
2020-08-25 8:54 ` John Hubbard
2020-08-25 8:54 ` John Hubbard
2020-08-25 8:54 ` John Hubbard
2020-08-25 9:02 ` Jens Wiklander
2020-08-25 9:02 ` Jens Wiklander
2020-08-25 9:02 ` Jens Wiklander
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200825083204.GA2068961@jade \
--to=jens.wiklander@linaro.org \
--cc=arm@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=soc@kernel.org \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--cc=tee-dev@lists.linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.