All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
To: "José Roberto de Souza" <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Hariom Pandey <hariom.pandey@intel.com>,
	Srinivas K <srinivasx.k@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 1/3] drm/i915/display: Compute has_drrs after compute has_psr
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 12:56:00 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200826072559.GJ25390@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200825171331.17971-1-jose.souza@intel.com>

On 2020-08-25 at 10:13:29 -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> DRRS and PSR can't be enable together, so giving preference to PSR
> as it allows more power-savings by complete shutting down display,
> so to guarantee this, it should compute DRRS state after compute PSR.
> 
> Cc: Srinivas K <srinivasx.k@intel.com>
> Cc: Hariom Pandey <hariom.pandey@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 52 +++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index 79c27f91f42c..a08d03c61b02 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -2575,6 +2575,34 @@ intel_dp_compute_hdr_metadata_infoframe_sdp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  		intel_hdmi_infoframe_enable(HDMI_PACKET_TYPE_GAMUT_METADATA);
>  }
>  
> +static void
> +intel_dp_drrs_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> +			     struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config,
> +			     int output_bpp, bool constant_n)
> +{
> +	struct intel_connector *intel_connector = intel_dp->attached_connector;
> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * DRRS and PSR can't be enable together, so giving preference to PSR
> +	 * as it allows more power-savings by complete shutting down display,
> +	 * so to guarantee this, intel_dp_drrs_compute_config() must be called
> +	 * after intel_psr_compute_config().
> +	 */
> +	if (pipe_config->has_psr)
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (!intel_connector->panel.downclock_mode ||
> +	    dev_priv->drrs.type != SEAMLESS_DRRS_SUPPORT)
> +		return;
> +
> +	pipe_config->has_drrs = true;
> +	intel_link_compute_m_n(output_bpp, pipe_config->lane_count,
> +			       intel_connector->panel.downclock_mode->clock,
> +			       pipe_config->port_clock, &pipe_config->dp_m2_n2,
> +			       constant_n, pipe_config->fec_enable);
> +}
> +
>  int
>  intel_dp_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>  			struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config,
> @@ -2605,7 +2633,6 @@ intel_dp_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> -	pipe_config->has_drrs = false;
IMHO this assignment is required, i was thinking a case, when a crtc is attached to more than 
one connector, suppose first eDP connector supports DRRS from panel.downclock_mode and
drrs.type but another DP connector won't support it in that case has_drrs will be still
true.
Please correct me if i am wrong here. 
Thanks,
Anshuman Gupta.
>  	if (!intel_dp_port_has_audio(dev_priv, port))
>  		pipe_config->has_audio = false;
>  	else if (intel_conn_state->force_audio == HDMI_AUDIO_AUTO)
> @@ -2657,21 +2684,12 @@ intel_dp_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>  			       &pipe_config->dp_m_n,
>  			       constant_n, pipe_config->fec_enable);
>  
> -	if (intel_connector->panel.downclock_mode != NULL &&
> -		dev_priv->drrs.type == SEAMLESS_DRRS_SUPPORT) {
> -			pipe_config->has_drrs = true;
> -			intel_link_compute_m_n(output_bpp,
> -					       pipe_config->lane_count,
> -					       intel_connector->panel.downclock_mode->clock,
> -					       pipe_config->port_clock,
> -					       &pipe_config->dp_m2_n2,
> -					       constant_n, pipe_config->fec_enable);
> -	}
> -
>  	if (!HAS_DDI(dev_priv))
>  		intel_dp_set_clock(encoder, pipe_config);
>  
>  	intel_psr_compute_config(intel_dp, pipe_config);
> +	intel_dp_drrs_compute_config(intel_dp, pipe_config, output_bpp,
> +				     constant_n);
>  	intel_dp_compute_vsc_sdp(intel_dp, pipe_config, conn_state);
>  	intel_dp_compute_hdr_metadata_infoframe_sdp(intel_dp, pipe_config, conn_state);
>  
> @@ -7730,16 +7748,10 @@ void intel_edp_drrs_enable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  {
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
>  
> -	if (!crtc_state->has_drrs) {
> -		drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "Panel doesn't support DRRS\n");
> +	if (!crtc_state->has_drrs)
>  		return;
> -	}
>  
> -	if (dev_priv->psr.enabled) {
> -		drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> -			    "PSR enabled. Not enabling DRRS.\n");
> -		return;
> -	}
> +	drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "Enabling DRRS\n");
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&dev_priv->drrs.mutex);
>  	if (dev_priv->drrs.dp) {
> -- 
> 2.28.0
> 
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-08-26  7:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-25 17:13 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 1/3] drm/i915/display: Compute has_drrs after compute has_psr José Roberto de Souza
2020-08-25 17:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 2/3] drm/i915/display: Disable DRRS when needed in fastsets José Roberto de Souza
2020-08-26  7:20   ` Anshuman Gupta
2020-08-25 17:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 3/3] drm/i915/display: Fix DRRS debugfs José Roberto de Souza
2020-08-26  7:14   ` Anshuman Gupta
2020-08-25 17:38 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v3,1/3] drm/i915/display: Compute has_drrs after compute has_psr Patchwork
2020-08-25 18:50 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2020-08-27 16:54   ` Souza, Jose
2020-08-26  7:26 ` Anshuman Gupta [this message]
2020-08-26 16:47   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 1/3] " Souza, Jose
2020-08-27 12:09     ` Anshuman Gupta
2020-08-27 16:51       ` Souza, Jose

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200826072559.GJ25390@intel.com \
    --to=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
    --cc=hariom.pandey@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jose.souza@intel.com \
    --cc=srinivasx.k@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.