From: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
To: Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_oss@crudebyte.com>
Cc: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 9pfs: log warning if msize <= 8192
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2020 18:54:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200902185422.16b4ee28@bahia.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2877776.MzA8b4DPAS@silver>
On Wed, 02 Sep 2020 18:03:12 +0200
Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_oss@crudebyte.com> wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 2. September 2020 16:10:35 CEST Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > Yeah, I know, but the problem is I don't see how I would squeeze the
> > > relevant information into only one log message; and even "what's a good
> > > starting point" is already questionable.
> > >
> > > For that reason my plan was:
> > > - logging this warning
> > >
> > > - describing the 'msize' issue in detail on the QEMU wiki (what's the
> > >
> > > point, how would you benchmark it)
> > >
> > > So my idea was: user sees the message, "what is 'msize?'" -> Google "msize
> > > qemu" -> click 'QEMU wiki' -> read all the details.
> > >
> > > But how about this: I put a QEMU wiki link directly into the log message?
> >
> > Rather than that, how about putting it in the QEMU man page, and then
> > just add "See 'man 1 qemu' for further guidance".
>
> Well, I can do that of course. But somehow I fear users get lost by just
> pointing them to "man 1 qemu" in the log message. It already starts that e.g.
> on Debian there is no "man qemu", it is "man qemu-system" there instead. Next
> issue is that qemu man page is currently not structured in a way that would
> allow me to directly point them to the relevant man heading like:
>
> man --pager='less -p ^9P-msize' qemu
>
> So they would need to scroll their way through the entire man page by
> themselfes and find confusing sections like "-fsdev -device virtio-9p-pci" vs.
> "-virtfs", etc. I can imagine some people will struggle with that.
>
> With a link like "https://wiki.qemu.org/Documentation/9psetup#msize" the thing
> would be crystal clear within seconds.
>
> Just my opinion. Greg?
>
Fine by me for this patch.
For a longer term, maybe we should find a way to advertise some hint
for msize to the guest... Not sure how to do that though.
Cheers,
--
Greg
> Best regards,
> Christian Schoenebeck
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-02 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-02 11:22 [PATCH] 9pfs: log warning if msize <= 8192 Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-02 12:25 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-09-02 12:52 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-02 13:39 ` Greg Kurz
2020-09-02 13:45 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-09-02 14:08 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-02 14:10 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-09-02 16:03 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-02 16:08 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-09-02 16:54 ` Greg Kurz [this message]
2020-09-03 8:20 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-03 9:35 ` Greg Kurz
2020-09-03 10:57 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-02 13:58 ` Christian Schoenebeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200902185422.16b4ee28@bahia.lan \
--to=groug@kaod.org \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu_oss@crudebyte.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.