From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Clint Sbisa <csbisa@amazon.com>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <will@kernel.org>,
<catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Enable PCI write-combine resources under sysfs
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 11:21:33 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200911142133.GL904879@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3110e00a1f4df7b7359ba4f2b7f86a35aa47405e.camel@kernel.crashing.org>
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 10:39:16AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Yes, "write combine" isn't a good name.... The goal is to get WC but it
> comes with the whole package on several archs. We don't even have a
> reasonnable definition of the semantics of readl/writel on a WC mapping
> (hint: on powerpc the barriers in them will prevent WC even on a WC
> mapping) nor of what barriers might work and how on such a mapping.
Yes, you can't really use WC properly in the kernel, we don't have the
infrastructure for it. mlx5 is using __raw_writeq() and wmb() to hack
something ugly together in the kernel.
A useful API for the message method, similar to what we use in
userspace, is something like:
/*
* Almost always need a spinlock as multiple CPUs cannot write
* concurrently.
*/
spin_lock();
/*
* Ensure that all DMA visiable writes in program order are visible
* to DMA before the WC TLP is sent.
*/
barrier_wc_after_lock();
/* Generate the TLP */
write_wc_message(wc_iomem, message, len);
/*
* Writes to wc_iomem past this, by any CPU, cannot replace writes
* already done in wc_message.
*/
barrier_wc_before_unlock();
spin_unlock();
And another varient without the spinlock for stuff that can be per-CPU
for a range of WC memory.
(oh actually I see most drivers are using ioremap_wc(), and there is a
bunch of them including an Amazon ethernet device...)
Jason
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Clint Sbisa <csbisa@amazon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Enable PCI write-combine resources under sysfs
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 11:21:33 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200911142133.GL904879@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3110e00a1f4df7b7359ba4f2b7f86a35aa47405e.camel@kernel.crashing.org>
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 10:39:16AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Yes, "write combine" isn't a good name.... The goal is to get WC but it
> comes with the whole package on several archs. We don't even have a
> reasonnable definition of the semantics of readl/writel on a WC mapping
> (hint: on powerpc the barriers in them will prevent WC even on a WC
> mapping) nor of what barriers might work and how on such a mapping.
Yes, you can't really use WC properly in the kernel, we don't have the
infrastructure for it. mlx5 is using __raw_writeq() and wmb() to hack
something ugly together in the kernel.
A useful API for the message method, similar to what we use in
userspace, is something like:
/*
* Almost always need a spinlock as multiple CPUs cannot write
* concurrently.
*/
spin_lock();
/*
* Ensure that all DMA visiable writes in program order are visible
* to DMA before the WC TLP is sent.
*/
barrier_wc_after_lock();
/* Generate the TLP */
write_wc_message(wc_iomem, message, len);
/*
* Writes to wc_iomem past this, by any CPU, cannot replace writes
* already done in wc_message.
*/
barrier_wc_before_unlock();
spin_unlock();
And another varient without the spinlock for stuff that can be per-CPU
for a range of WC memory.
(oh actually I see most drivers are using ioremap_wc(), and there is a
bunch of them including an Amazon ethernet device...)
Jason
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-11 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 117+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-31 15:18 [PATCH] arm64: Enable PCI write-combine resources under sysfs Clint Sbisa
2020-08-31 23:24 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2020-09-01 18:37 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-09-01 23:22 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2020-09-02 8:57 ` Will Deacon
2020-09-02 11:32 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-09-02 14:29 ` Clint Sbisa
2020-09-02 16:47 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-09-02 16:47 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-09-02 17:21 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-09-02 17:21 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-09-02 17:54 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-09-02 17:54 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-09-02 23:03 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2020-09-02 23:03 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2020-09-02 23:08 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2020-09-02 23:08 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2020-09-02 23:08 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2020-09-02 23:08 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2020-09-02 23:07 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2020-09-02 23:07 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2020-09-03 11:08 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-09-03 11:08 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-09-03 14:36 ` Clint Sbisa
2020-09-03 14:36 ` Clint Sbisa
2020-09-03 22:26 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2020-09-03 22:26 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2020-09-07 23:33 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2020-09-07 23:33 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2020-09-10 9:46 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-09-10 9:46 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-09-10 10:54 ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-09-10 10:54 ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-09-10 12:37 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-10 12:37 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-10 15:17 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-09-10 15:17 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-09-10 17:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-10 17:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-10 21:46 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2020-09-10 21:46 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2020-09-10 23:29 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-10 23:29 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-11 0:39 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2020-09-11 0:39 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2020-09-11 14:21 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2020-09-11 14:21 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-11 21:42 ` Clint Sbisa
2020-09-11 21:42 ` Clint Sbisa
2020-09-14 14:17 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-14 14:17 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-14 14:24 ` Clint Sbisa
2020-09-14 14:24 ` Clint Sbisa
2020-09-14 14:38 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-14 14:38 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-14 21:42 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2020-09-14 21:42 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2020-09-14 22:00 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2020-09-14 22:00 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2020-09-14 22:32 ` Clint Sbisa
2020-09-14 22:32 ` Clint Sbisa
2020-09-14 22:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-14 22:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-14 23:25 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2020-09-14 23:25 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2020-09-15 10:18 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-09-15 10:18 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-09-15 11:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-15 11:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-15 23:17 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2020-09-15 23:17 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2020-09-15 23:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-15 23:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-16 7:59 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2020-09-16 7:59 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2020-09-16 12:12 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-16 12:12 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-16 14:09 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-09-16 14:09 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-09-16 14:14 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-16 14:14 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-16 23:59 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2020-09-16 23:59 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2020-09-17 10:28 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-09-17 10:28 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-09-17 11:32 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-17 11:32 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-17 14:01 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-09-17 14:01 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-09-17 16:08 ` Will Deacon
2020-09-17 16:08 ` Will Deacon
2020-09-16 12:48 ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-09-16 12:48 ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-09-16 8:33 ` Will Deacon
2020-09-16 8:33 ` Will Deacon
2020-09-16 8:48 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-09-16 8:48 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-09-16 14:15 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-09-16 14:15 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-09-16 17:00 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-09-16 17:00 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-09-16 21:29 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2020-09-16 21:29 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2020-09-16 12:08 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-16 12:08 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-15 23:00 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2020-09-15 23:00 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2020-09-15 23:12 ` Clint Sbisa
2020-09-15 23:12 ` Clint Sbisa
2020-09-14 21:41 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2020-09-14 21:41 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-08-21 15:51 Clint Sbisa
2020-08-21 15:51 ` Clint Sbisa
2020-08-27 14:41 ` Clint Sbisa
2020-08-27 14:41 ` Clint Sbisa
2020-08-31 15:22 ` Clint Sbisa
2020-08-31 15:22 ` Clint Sbisa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200911142133.GL904879@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=csbisa@amazon.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.