[PATCH] MAINTAINERS: make linux-usb list remarks consistent

[PATCH] MAINTAINERS: make linux-usb list remarks consistent

[Lukas Bulwahn]

Commit f24f27b85ead ("MAINTAINERS: add entry for mediatek usb3 DRD IP
driver") claims linux-usb@vger.kernel.org is moderated for
non-subscribers, but all other 46 entries for linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
do not mention that.

Adjust this entry to be consistent with all others.

Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
---
applies cleanly on current master and next-20200911

Greg, please pick this minor non-urgent clean-up patch for your -next tree.

This patch submission will also show me if linux-usb is moderated or not.
I have not subscribed to linux-usb and if it shows up quickly in the
archive, the list is probably not moderated, and hence, validating the
patch.

 MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 26af84f97353..4396a8986518 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -11112,7 +11112,7 @@ F:	net/dsa/tag_mtk.c
 
 MEDIATEK USB3 DRD IP DRIVER
 M:	Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com>
-L:	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
+L:	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
 L:	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
 L:	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
 S:	Maintained
-- 
2.17.1

[PATCH] MAINTAINERS: make linux-usb list remarks consistent

[Lukas Bulwahn]

Commit f24f27b85ead ("MAINTAINERS: add entry for mediatek usb3 DRD IP
driver") claims linux-usb@vger.kernel.org is moderated for
non-subscribers, but all other 46 entries for linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
do not mention that.

Adjust this entry to be consistent with all others.

Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
---
applies cleanly on current master and next-20200911

Greg, please pick this minor non-urgent clean-up patch for your -next tree.

This patch submission will also show me if linux-usb is moderated or not.
I have not subscribed to linux-usb and if it shows up quickly in the
archive, the list is probably not moderated, and hence, validating the
patch.

 MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 26af84f97353..4396a8986518 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -11112,7 +11112,7 @@ F:	net/dsa/tag_mtk.c
 
 MEDIATEK USB3 DRD IP DRIVER
 M:	Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com>
-L:	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
+L:	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
 L:	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
 L:	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
 S:	Maintained
-- 
2.17.1

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: make linux-usb list remarks consistent

[Lukas Bulwahn]

On Sat, 12 Sep 2020, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:

> This patch submission will also show me if linux-usb is moderated or not.
> I have not subscribed to linux-usb and if it shows up quickly in the
> archive, the list is probably not moderated, and hence, validating the
> patch.
> 

The patch showed up in the archives within seconds:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/20200912121346.2796-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com/

So, the linux-usb list is most likely not moderated. Patch validated.

Lukas

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: make linux-usb list remarks consistent

[Lukas Bulwahn]

On Sat, 12 Sep 2020, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:

> This patch submission will also show me if linux-usb is moderated or not.
> I have not subscribed to linux-usb and if it shows up quickly in the
> archive, the list is probably not moderated, and hence, validating the
> patch.
> 

The patch showed up in the archives within seconds:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/20200912121346.2796-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com/

So, the linux-usb list is most likely not moderated. Patch validated.

Lukas

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: make linux-usb list remarks consistent

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 02:19:02PM +0200, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> 
> 
> On Sat, 12 Sep 2020, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> 
> > This patch submission will also show me if linux-usb is moderated or not.
> > I have not subscribed to linux-usb and if it shows up quickly in the
> > archive, the list is probably not moderated, and hence, validating the
> > patch.
> > 
> 
> The patch showed up in the archives within seconds:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/20200912121346.2796-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com/
> 
> So, the linux-usb list is most likely not moderated. Patch validated.

Yes, it is not moderated, and never has been, no idea where that idea came from.

thanks,

greg k-h

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: make linux-usb list remarks consistent

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 02:19:02PM +0200, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> 
> 
> On Sat, 12 Sep 2020, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> 
> > This patch submission will also show me if linux-usb is moderated or not.
> > I have not subscribed to linux-usb and if it shows up quickly in the
> > archive, the list is probably not moderated, and hence, validating the
> > patch.
> > 
> 
> The patch showed up in the archives within seconds:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/20200912121346.2796-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com/
> 
> So, the linux-usb list is most likely not moderated. Patch validated.

Yes, it is not moderated, and never has been, no idea where that idea came from.

thanks,

greg k-h

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: make linux-usb list remarks consistent

[Joe Perches]

On Sat, 2020-09-12 at 14:40 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 02:19:02PM +0200, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> > 
> > On Sat, 12 Sep 2020, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> > 
> > > This patch submission will also show me if linux-usb is moderated or not.
> > > I have not subscribed to linux-usb and if it shows up quickly in the
> > > archive, the list is probably not moderated, and hence, validating the
> > > patch.
> > > 
> > 
> > The patch showed up in the archives within seconds:
> > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/20200912121346.2796-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com/
> > 
> > So, the linux-usb list is most likely not moderated. Patch validated.
> 
> Yes, it is not moderated, and never has been, no idea where that idea came from.

There's also linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
that is listed as moderated

Are any of the vger lists actually moderated?

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: make linux-usb list remarks consistent

[Joe Perches]

On Sat, 2020-09-12 at 14:40 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 02:19:02PM +0200, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> > 
> > On Sat, 12 Sep 2020, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> > 
> > > This patch submission will also show me if linux-usb is moderated or not.
> > > I have not subscribed to linux-usb and if it shows up quickly in the
> > > archive, the list is probably not moderated, and hence, validating the
> > > patch.
> > > 
> > 
> > The patch showed up in the archives within seconds:
> > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/20200912121346.2796-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com/
> > 
> > So, the linux-usb list is most likely not moderated. Patch validated.
> 
> Yes, it is not moderated, and never has been, no idea where that idea came from.

There's also linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
that is listed as moderated

Are any of the vger lists actually moderated?

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: make linux-usb list remarks consistent

[Lukas Bulwahn]

On Sat, 12 Sep 2020, Joe Perches wrote:

> On Sat, 2020-09-12 at 14:40 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 02:19:02PM +0200, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Sat, 12 Sep 2020, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> > > 
> > > > This patch submission will also show me if linux-usb is moderated or not.
> > > > I have not subscribed to linux-usb and if it shows up quickly in the
> > > > archive, the list is probably not moderated, and hence, validating the
> > > > patch.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > The patch showed up in the archives within seconds:
> > > 
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/20200912121346.2796-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com/
> > > 
> > > So, the linux-usb list is most likely not moderated. Patch validated.
> > 
> > Yes, it is not moderated, and never has been, no idea where that idea came from.
> 
> There's also linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
> that is listed as moderated
> 
> Are any of the vger lists actually moderated?
>  


Joe, I found these five list entries with inconsistent remarks:

- linux-usb@vger.kernel.org:
  - Patch: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200912121346.2796-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com/  (the patch here)

- linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org:
  - Patch: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200912183334.22683-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com/

- linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org:
  - Patch: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200914053110.23286-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com/
    - initial patch here was wrong.
    - waiting for somebody to confirm that it is not moderated to then 
send the correct patch.

- linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org:
  - Patch: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200914061353.17535-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com/

- linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org:
  - by 'majority vote' (131 vs. 27), it is probably moderated.
  - no patch sent yet; patch will follow once the others are accepted.

Then, more patches on adding 'exploders for non-subscribers' remarks will 
follow.


Lukas

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: make linux-usb list remarks consistent

[Lukas Bulwahn]

On Sat, 12 Sep 2020, Joe Perches wrote:

> On Sat, 2020-09-12 at 14:40 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 02:19:02PM +0200, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Sat, 12 Sep 2020, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> > > 
> > > > This patch submission will also show me if linux-usb is moderated or not.
> > > > I have not subscribed to linux-usb and if it shows up quickly in the
> > > > archive, the list is probably not moderated, and hence, validating the
> > > > patch.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > The patch showed up in the archives within seconds:
> > > 
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/20200912121346.2796-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com/
> > > 
> > > So, the linux-usb list is most likely not moderated. Patch validated.
> > 
> > Yes, it is not moderated, and never has been, no idea where that idea came from.
> 
> There's also linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
> that is listed as moderated
> 
> Are any of the vger lists actually moderated?
>  


Joe, I found these five list entries with inconsistent remarks:

- linux-usb@vger.kernel.org:
  - Patch: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200912121346.2796-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com/  (the patch here)

- linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org:
  - Patch: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200912183334.22683-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com/

- linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org:
  - Patch: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200914053110.23286-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com/
    - initial patch here was wrong.
    - waiting for somebody to confirm that it is not moderated to then 
send the correct patch.

- linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org:
  - Patch: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200914061353.17535-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com/

- linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org:
  - by 'majority vote' (131 vs. 27), it is probably moderated.
  - no patch sent yet; patch will follow once the others are accepted.

Then, more patches on adding 'exploders for non-subscribers' remarks will 
follow.


Lukas