From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>
Cc: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Zong Li <zong.li@sifive.com>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
Jia He <justin.he@arm.com>, Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@sifive.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List"
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 0/5] Unify NUMA implementation between ARM64 & RISC-V
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 17:05:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200918170514.00002e44@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOnJCULGNha6aZaWZDn8zX3MZHn1H=uCrnNjpiqE11meRQz5eQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 12:33:59 -0700
Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 1:07 AM Jonathan Cameron
> <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:34:36 -0700
> > Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi Atish,
> >
> > I'm not seeing a change log from v1. Putting one in makes it easier
> > for people who reviewed v1 to remember what to look for when looking
> > at v2.
> >
>
> My bad. I usually add a change log in the header patch but forgot this time.
> I will send out a v3 soon and update those.
>
> Thanks for reviewing the patches.
Hi Atish,
I just noticed this was also not sent to <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
which will rather cut down on the relevant audience! Add that list to the
cc for v3.
Thanks,
Jonathan
> > Either here, or individual patches after the --- is fine.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
> >
> > > This series attempts to move the ARM64 numa implementation to common
> > > code so that RISC-V can leverage that as well instead of reimplementing
> > > it again.
> > >
> > > RISC-V specific bits are based on initial work done by Greentime Hu [1] but
> > > modified to reuse the common implementation to avoid duplication.
> > >
> > > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/1/10/233
> > >
> > > This series has been tested on qemu with numa enabled for both RISC-V & ARM64.
> > > It would be great if somebody can test it on numa capable ARM64 hardware platforms.
> > > This patch series doesn't modify the maintainers list for the common code (arch_numa)
> > > as I am not sure if somebody from ARM64 community or Greg should take up the
> > > maintainership. Ganapatrao was the original author of the arm64 version.
> > > I would be happy to update that in the next revision once it is decided.
> > >
> > > # numactl --hardware
> > > available: 2 nodes (0-1)
> > > node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3
> > > node 0 size: 486 MB
> > > node 0 free: 470 MB
> > > node 1 cpus: 4 5 6 7
> > > node 1 size: 424 MB
> > > node 1 free: 408 MB
> > > node distances:
> > > node 0 1
> > > 0: 10 20
> > > 1: 20 10
> > > # numactl -show
> > > policy: default
> > > preferred node: current
> > > physcpubind: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
> > > cpubind: 0 1
> > > nodebind: 0 1
> > > membind: 0 1
> > >
> > > For RISC-V, the following qemu series is a pre-requisite(already available in upstream)
> > > to test the patches in Qemu and 2 socket OmniXtend FPGA.
> > >
> > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/qemu-devel/list/?series=303313
> > >
> > > The patches are also available at
> > >
> > > https://github.com/atishp04/linux/tree/5.10_numa_unified_v2
> > >
> > > There may be some minor conflicts with Mike's cleanup series [2] depending on the
> > > order in which these two series are being accepted. I can rebase on top his series
> > > if required.
> > >
> > > [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/8/18/754
> > >
> > > Atish Patra (4):
> > > numa: Move numa implementation to common code
> > > arm64, numa: Change the numa init function name to be generic
> > > riscv: Separate memory init from paging init
> > > riscv: Add numa support for riscv64 platform
> > >
> > > Greentime Hu (1):
> > > riscv: Add support pte_protnone and pmd_protnone if
> > > CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
> > >
> > > arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 +
> > > arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h | 45 +----------------
> > > arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 13 -----
> > > arch/arm64/mm/Makefile | 1 -
> > > arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 4 +-
> > > arch/riscv/Kconfig | 31 +++++++++++-
> > > arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h | 13 +++++
> > > arch/riscv/include/asm/numa.h | 8 +++
> > > arch/riscv/include/asm/pci.h | 14 ++++++
> > > arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h | 21 ++++++++
> > > arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c | 11 ++++-
> > > arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c | 12 ++++-
> > > arch/riscv/mm/init.c | 10 +++-
> > > drivers/base/Kconfig | 6 +++
> > > drivers/base/Makefile | 1 +
> > > .../mm/numa.c => drivers/base/arch_numa.c | 29 +++++++++--
> > > include/asm-generic/numa.h | 49 +++++++++++++++++++
> > > 17 files changed, 200 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
> > > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h
> > > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/numa.h
> > > rename arch/arm64/mm/numa.c => drivers/base/arch_numa.c (95%)
> > > create mode 100644 include/asm-generic/numa.h
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.24.0
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-riscv mailing list
> > linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
>
>
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>, Zong Li <zong.li@sifive.com>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Jia He <justin.he@arm.com>,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@sifive.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List"
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 0/5] Unify NUMA implementation between ARM64 & RISC-V
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 17:05:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200918170514.00002e44@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOnJCULGNha6aZaWZDn8zX3MZHn1H=uCrnNjpiqE11meRQz5eQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 12:33:59 -0700
Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 1:07 AM Jonathan Cameron
> <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:34:36 -0700
> > Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi Atish,
> >
> > I'm not seeing a change log from v1. Putting one in makes it easier
> > for people who reviewed v1 to remember what to look for when looking
> > at v2.
> >
>
> My bad. I usually add a change log in the header patch but forgot this time.
> I will send out a v3 soon and update those.
>
> Thanks for reviewing the patches.
Hi Atish,
I just noticed this was also not sent to <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
which will rather cut down on the relevant audience! Add that list to the
cc for v3.
Thanks,
Jonathan
> > Either here, or individual patches after the --- is fine.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
> >
> > > This series attempts to move the ARM64 numa implementation to common
> > > code so that RISC-V can leverage that as well instead of reimplementing
> > > it again.
> > >
> > > RISC-V specific bits are based on initial work done by Greentime Hu [1] but
> > > modified to reuse the common implementation to avoid duplication.
> > >
> > > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/1/10/233
> > >
> > > This series has been tested on qemu with numa enabled for both RISC-V & ARM64.
> > > It would be great if somebody can test it on numa capable ARM64 hardware platforms.
> > > This patch series doesn't modify the maintainers list for the common code (arch_numa)
> > > as I am not sure if somebody from ARM64 community or Greg should take up the
> > > maintainership. Ganapatrao was the original author of the arm64 version.
> > > I would be happy to update that in the next revision once it is decided.
> > >
> > > # numactl --hardware
> > > available: 2 nodes (0-1)
> > > node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3
> > > node 0 size: 486 MB
> > > node 0 free: 470 MB
> > > node 1 cpus: 4 5 6 7
> > > node 1 size: 424 MB
> > > node 1 free: 408 MB
> > > node distances:
> > > node 0 1
> > > 0: 10 20
> > > 1: 20 10
> > > # numactl -show
> > > policy: default
> > > preferred node: current
> > > physcpubind: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
> > > cpubind: 0 1
> > > nodebind: 0 1
> > > membind: 0 1
> > >
> > > For RISC-V, the following qemu series is a pre-requisite(already available in upstream)
> > > to test the patches in Qemu and 2 socket OmniXtend FPGA.
> > >
> > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/qemu-devel/list/?series=303313
> > >
> > > The patches are also available at
> > >
> > > https://github.com/atishp04/linux/tree/5.10_numa_unified_v2
> > >
> > > There may be some minor conflicts with Mike's cleanup series [2] depending on the
> > > order in which these two series are being accepted. I can rebase on top his series
> > > if required.
> > >
> > > [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/8/18/754
> > >
> > > Atish Patra (4):
> > > numa: Move numa implementation to common code
> > > arm64, numa: Change the numa init function name to be generic
> > > riscv: Separate memory init from paging init
> > > riscv: Add numa support for riscv64 platform
> > >
> > > Greentime Hu (1):
> > > riscv: Add support pte_protnone and pmd_protnone if
> > > CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
> > >
> > > arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 +
> > > arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h | 45 +----------------
> > > arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 13 -----
> > > arch/arm64/mm/Makefile | 1 -
> > > arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 4 +-
> > > arch/riscv/Kconfig | 31 +++++++++++-
> > > arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h | 13 +++++
> > > arch/riscv/include/asm/numa.h | 8 +++
> > > arch/riscv/include/asm/pci.h | 14 ++++++
> > > arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h | 21 ++++++++
> > > arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c | 11 ++++-
> > > arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c | 12 ++++-
> > > arch/riscv/mm/init.c | 10 +++-
> > > drivers/base/Kconfig | 6 +++
> > > drivers/base/Makefile | 1 +
> > > .../mm/numa.c => drivers/base/arch_numa.c | 29 +++++++++--
> > > include/asm-generic/numa.h | 49 +++++++++++++++++++
> > > 17 files changed, 200 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
> > > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h
> > > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/numa.h
> > > rename arch/arm64/mm/numa.c => drivers/base/arch_numa.c (95%)
> > > create mode 100644 include/asm-generic/numa.h
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.24.0
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-riscv mailing list
> > linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-18 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-12 1:34 [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 0/5] Unify NUMA implementation between ARM64 & RISC-V Atish Patra
2020-09-12 1:34 ` Atish Patra
2020-09-12 1:34 ` [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 1/5] numa: Move numa implementation to common code Atish Patra
2020-09-12 1:34 ` Atish Patra
2020-09-14 14:21 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-09-14 14:21 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-09-12 1:34 ` [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 2/5] arm64, numa: Change the numa init function name to be generic Atish Patra
2020-09-12 1:34 ` Atish Patra
2020-09-14 14:30 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-09-14 14:30 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-09-14 19:32 ` Atish Patra
2020-09-14 19:32 ` Atish Patra
2020-09-15 8:27 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-09-15 8:27 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-09-15 4:11 ` kernel test robot
2020-09-12 1:34 ` [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 3/5] riscv: Separate memory init from paging init Atish Patra
2020-09-12 1:34 ` Atish Patra
2020-09-12 2:10 ` Greentime Hu
2020-09-12 2:10 ` Greentime Hu
2020-09-12 1:34 ` [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 4/5] riscv: Add support pte_protnone and pmd_protnone if CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING Atish Patra
2020-09-12 1:34 ` Atish Patra
2020-09-12 1:34 ` [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 5/5] riscv: Add numa support for riscv64 platform Atish Patra
2020-09-12 1:34 ` Atish Patra
2020-09-16 22:19 ` kernel test robot
2020-09-14 8:04 ` [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 0/5] Unify NUMA implementation between ARM64 & RISC-V Jonathan Cameron
2020-09-14 8:04 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-09-14 19:33 ` Atish Patra
2020-09-14 19:33 ` Atish Patra
2020-09-18 16:05 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2020-09-18 16:05 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-09-18 19:18 ` Atish Patra
2020-09-18 19:18 ` Atish Patra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200918170514.00002e44@Huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=atish.patra@wdc.com \
--cc=atishp@atishpatra.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=greentime.hu@sifive.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=justin.he@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=nsaenzjulienne@suse.de \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=zong.li@sifive.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.