From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] e1000e: Power cycle phy on PM resume
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 14:17:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200923121748.GE3770354@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200923074751.10527-1-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 03:47:51PM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
> We are seeing the following error after S3 resume:
> [ 704.746874] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eno1: Setting page 0x6020
> [ 704.844232] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eno1: MDI Write did not complete
> [ 704.902817] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eno1: Setting page 0x6020
> [ 704.903075] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eno1: reading PHY page 769 (or 0x6020 shifted) reg 0x17
> [ 704.903281] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eno1: Setting page 0x6020
> [ 704.903486] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eno1: writing PHY page 769 (or 0x6020 shifted) reg 0x17
> [ 704.943155] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eno1: MDI Error
> ...
> [ 705.108161] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eno1: Hardware Error
>
> Since we don't know what platform firmware may do to the phy, so let's
> power cycle the phy upon system resume to resolve the issue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> index 664e8ccc88d2..c2a87a408102 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> @@ -6968,6 +6968,8 @@ static __maybe_unused int e1000e_pm_resume(struct device *dev)
> !e1000e_check_me(hw->adapter->pdev->device))
> e1000e_s0ix_exit_flow(adapter);
>
> + e1000_power_down_phy(adapter);
> +
static void e1000_power_down_phy(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
{
struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
/* Power down the PHY so no link is implied when interface is down *
* The PHY cannot be powered down if any of the following is true *
* (a) WoL is enabled
* (b) AMT is active
* (c) SoL/IDER session is active
*/
if (!adapter->wol && hw->mac_type >= e1000_82540 &&
hw->media_type == e1000_media_type_copper) {
Could it be coming out of S3 because it just received a WoL?
It seems unlikely that it is the MII_CR_POWER_DOWN which is helping,
since that is an MDIO write itself. Do you actually know how this call
to e1000_power_down_phy() fixes the issues?
Andrew
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
Cc: jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
"moderated list:INTEL ETHERNET DRIVERS"
<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
"open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] e1000e: Power cycle phy on PM resume
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 14:17:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200923121748.GE3770354@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200923074751.10527-1-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 03:47:51PM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
> We are seeing the following error after S3 resume:
> [ 704.746874] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eno1: Setting page 0x6020
> [ 704.844232] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eno1: MDI Write did not complete
> [ 704.902817] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eno1: Setting page 0x6020
> [ 704.903075] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eno1: reading PHY page 769 (or 0x6020 shifted) reg 0x17
> [ 704.903281] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eno1: Setting page 0x6020
> [ 704.903486] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eno1: writing PHY page 769 (or 0x6020 shifted) reg 0x17
> [ 704.943155] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eno1: MDI Error
> ...
> [ 705.108161] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eno1: Hardware Error
>
> Since we don't know what platform firmware may do to the phy, so let's
> power cycle the phy upon system resume to resolve the issue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> index 664e8ccc88d2..c2a87a408102 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> @@ -6968,6 +6968,8 @@ static __maybe_unused int e1000e_pm_resume(struct device *dev)
> !e1000e_check_me(hw->adapter->pdev->device))
> e1000e_s0ix_exit_flow(adapter);
>
> + e1000_power_down_phy(adapter);
> +
static void e1000_power_down_phy(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
{
struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
/* Power down the PHY so no link is implied when interface is down *
* The PHY cannot be powered down if any of the following is true *
* (a) WoL is enabled
* (b) AMT is active
* (c) SoL/IDER session is active
*/
if (!adapter->wol && hw->mac_type >= e1000_82540 &&
hw->media_type == e1000_media_type_copper) {
Could it be coming out of S3 because it just received a WoL?
It seems unlikely that it is the MII_CR_POWER_DOWN which is helping,
since that is an MDIO write itself. Do you actually know how this call
to e1000_power_down_phy() fixes the issues?
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-23 12:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-23 7:47 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] e1000e: Power cycle phy on PM resume Kai-Heng Feng
2020-09-23 7:47 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2020-09-23 12:17 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2020-09-23 12:17 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-09-23 14:44 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kai-Heng Feng
2020-09-23 14:44 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2020-09-23 15:37 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Andrew Lunn
2020-09-23 15:37 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-09-24 12:50 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kai-Heng Feng
2020-09-24 12:50 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2020-09-23 13:28 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Paul Menzel
2020-09-23 13:28 ` Paul Menzel
2020-09-23 14:46 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2020-09-23 14:46 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2020-09-23 15:02 ` Paul Menzel
2020-09-23 15:02 ` Paul Menzel
2020-09-23 19:28 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-09-23 19:28 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-09-24 13:02 ` Paul Menzel
2020-09-24 13:02 ` Paul Menzel
2020-09-24 15:09 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2] e1000e: Increase iteration on polling MDIC ready bit Kai-Heng Feng
2020-09-24 15:09 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2020-09-24 15:32 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Paul Menzel
2020-09-24 15:32 ` Paul Menzel
2020-09-24 16:04 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-09-24 16:04 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-09-24 15:53 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-09-24 15:53 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-09-24 16:04 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kai-Heng Feng
2020-09-24 16:04 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2020-09-25 8:50 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " David Laight
2020-09-25 8:50 ` David Laight
2020-09-25 13:29 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Andrew Lunn
2020-09-25 13:29 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-09-26 10:08 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " David Laight
2020-09-26 10:08 ` David Laight
2020-09-24 16:45 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v3] " Kai-Heng Feng
2020-09-24 16:45 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2020-09-24 19:57 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Andrew Lunn
2020-09-24 19:57 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-09-25 3:57 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kai-Heng Feng
2020-09-25 3:57 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2020-09-25 5:16 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Paul Menzel
2020-09-25 5:16 ` Paul Menzel
2020-09-28 8:36 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v4] e1000e: Increase polling timeout on " Kai-Heng Feng
2020-09-28 8:36 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2020-09-29 13:08 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Neftin, Sasha
2020-09-29 13:08 ` Neftin, Sasha
2020-09-29 13:31 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2020-09-29 13:31 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2020-09-29 13:46 ` Neftin, Sasha
2020-09-29 13:46 ` Neftin, Sasha
2020-09-29 15:08 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2020-09-29 15:08 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2020-09-29 15:11 ` David Laight
2020-09-29 15:11 ` David Laight
2020-09-29 15:12 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2020-09-29 15:12 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2020-09-30 6:54 ` Vitaly Lifshits
2020-09-30 6:54 ` Vitaly Lifshits
2020-10-05 6:23 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2020-10-05 6:23 ` Kai-Heng Feng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200923121748.GE3770354@lunn.ch \
--to=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.