From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: Nitesh Narayan Lal <nitesh@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
mtosatti@redhat.com, sassmann@redhat.com,
jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, lihong.yang@intel.com,
helgaas@kernel.org, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com,
jacob.e.keller@intel.com, jlelli@redhat.com, hch@infradead.org,
bhelgaas@google.com, mike.marciniszyn@intel.com,
dennis.dalessandro@intel.com, thomas.lendacky@amd.com,
jerinj@marvell.com, mathias.nyman@intel.com, jiri@nvidia.com,
mingo@redhat.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] sched/isolation: API to get housekeeping online CPUs
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 14:24:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200924122402.GH2628@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200924120956.GA19346@lenoir>
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 02:09:57PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > +static inline unsigned int hk_num_online_cpus(void)
> >
> > This breaks with the established naming of that header.
>
> I guess we can make it housekeeping_num_online_cpus() ?
That would be consistent :-)
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2 1/4] sched/isolation: API to get housekeeping online CPUs
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 14:24:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200924122402.GH2628@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200924120956.GA19346@lenoir>
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 02:09:57PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > +static inline unsigned int hk_num_online_cpus(void)
> >
> > This breaks with the established naming of that header.
>
> I guess we can make it housekeeping_num_online_cpus() ?
That would be consistent :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-24 12:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-23 18:11 [PATCH v2 0/4] isolation: limit msix vectors based on housekeeping CPUs Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-09-23 18:11 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-09-23 18:11 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] sched/isolation: API to get housekeeping online CPUs Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-09-23 18:11 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-09-24 8:40 ` peterz
2020-09-24 8:40 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " peterz
2020-09-24 12:09 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-09-24 12:09 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Frederic Weisbecker
2020-09-24 12:23 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-09-24 12:23 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-09-24 12:24 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2020-09-24 12:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-09-24 12:11 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-09-24 12:11 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Frederic Weisbecker
2020-09-24 12:26 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-09-24 12:26 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-09-24 12:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-09-24 12:46 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Peter Zijlstra
2020-09-24 13:45 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-09-24 13:45 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-09-24 20:47 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-09-24 20:47 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Bjorn Helgaas
2020-09-24 21:52 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-09-24 21:52 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-09-23 18:11 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] sched/isolation: Extend nohz_full to isolate managed IRQs Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-09-23 18:11 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-09-23 18:11 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] i40e: limit msix vectors based on housekeeping CPUs Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-09-23 18:11 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-09-23 18:11 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] PCI: Limit pci_alloc_irq_vectors as per " Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-09-23 18:11 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-09-24 20:45 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-09-24 20:45 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Bjorn Helgaas
2020-09-24 21:39 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-09-24 21:39 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-09-24 22:59 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-09-24 22:59 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Bjorn Helgaas
2020-09-24 23:40 ` Nitesh Narayan Lal
2020-09-24 23:40 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Nitesh Narayan Lal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200924122402.GH2628@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dennis.dalessandro@intel.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=jiri@nvidia.com \
--cc=jlelli@redhat.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=lihong.yang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
--cc=mike.marciniszyn@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nitesh@redhat.com \
--cc=sassmann@redhat.com \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.