From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>
To: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org,
f.fainelli@gmail.com, andrew@lunn.ch, ayal@nvidia.com,
danieller@nvidia.com, amcohen@nvidia.com, mlxsw@nvidia.com,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net] ethtool: Fix incompatibility between netlink and ioctl interfaces
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 10:25:29 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200930072529.GA1788067@shredder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200929164455.pzymi4chmvl3yua5@lion.mk-sys.cz>
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 06:44:55PM +0200, Michal Kubecek wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 07:02:47PM +0300, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
> >
> > With the ioctl interface, when autoneg is enabled, but without
> > specifying speed, duplex or link modes, the advertised link modes are
> > set to the supported link modes by the ethtool user space utility.
> >
> [...]
> >
> > With the netlink interface, the same thing is done by the kernel, but
> > only if speed or duplex are specified. In which case, the advertised
> > link modes are set by traversing the supported link modes and picking
> > the ones matching the specified speed or duplex.
> >
> > However, if speed nor duplex are specified, the driver is passed an
> > empty advertised link modes bitmap. This causes the mlxsw driver to
> > return an error. Other drivers might also be affected. Example:
>
> This is not completely correct. What actually happens is that the
> advertised modes bitmap is left untouched. The reason why advertised
> modes are cleared for mlxsw is that this driver reports empty advertised
> modes whenever autonegotiation is disabled.
Correct. I'll reword.
>
> This is similar to recent discussions about distinguishing between
> configuration and state. One of them was related to EEE settings, one to
> pause settings, one to WoL settings vs. general wakeup enable/disable:
>
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200511132258.GT1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200512185503.GD1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200521192342.GE8771@lion.mk-sys.cz
>
> All of these are about common problem: we have a settings A and B such
> that B is only effective if A is enabled. Should we report B as disabled
> whenever A is disabled? I believe - and the consensus in those
> discussions seemed to be - that we should report and set A and B
> independently to distinguish between configuration (what user wants) and
> state (how the device behaves). There is also practical aspect: (1) if
> we don't do this, switching A off and on would reset the value of B even
> if no change of B was requested and (2) commands setting A and B must be
> issued in a specific order for changes of B to take effect.
>
> Unfortunately there are drivers like mlxsw (I'm not sure how many) which
> report zero advertised bitmap whenever autonegotiation is off.
>
> > diff --git a/net/ethtool/linkmodes.c b/net/ethtool/linkmodes.c
> > index 7044a2853886..a9458c76209e 100644
> > --- a/net/ethtool/linkmodes.c
> > +++ b/net/ethtool/linkmodes.c
> > @@ -288,9 +288,9 @@ linkmodes_set_policy[ETHTOOL_A_LINKMODES_MAX + 1] = {
> > };
> >
> > /* Set advertised link modes to all supported modes matching requested speed
> > - * and duplex values. Called when autonegotiation is on, speed or duplex is
> > - * requested but no link mode change. This is done in userspace with ioctl()
> > - * interface, move it into kernel for netlink.
> > + * and duplex values, if specified. Called when autonegotiation is on, but no
> > + * link mode change. This is done in userspace with ioctl() interface, move it
> > + * into kernel for netlink.
> > * Returns true if advertised modes bitmap was modified.
> > */
> > static bool ethnl_auto_linkmodes(struct ethtool_link_ksettings *ksettings,
> > @@ -381,7 +381,6 @@ static int ethnl_update_linkmodes(struct genl_info *info, struct nlattr **tb,
> > ethnl_update_u8(&lsettings->master_slave_cfg, master_slave_cfg, mod);
> >
> > if (!tb[ETHTOOL_A_LINKMODES_OURS] && lsettings->autoneg &&
> > - (req_speed || req_duplex) &&
> > ethnl_auto_linkmodes(ksettings, req_speed, req_duplex))
> > *mod = true;
>
> I'm afraid we will have to cope with existing drivers hiding advertised
> mode setting when autonegotiation is off. Could we at least limit the
> call to such drivers, i.e. replacing that line with something like
>
> (req_speed || req_duplex || (!old_autoneg && advertised_empty))
>
> where old_autoneg would be the original value of lsettings->autoneg and
> advertised_empty would be set if currently reported advertised modes are
> zero?
I don't think so. Doing:
# ethtool -s eth0 autoneg
Is a pretty established behavior to enable all the supported advertise
bits. Here is an example with an unpatched kernel, two ethtool versions
(ioctl & netlink) and e1000 in QEMU.
Ioctl:
# ethtool --version
ethtool version 5.4
# ethtool -s eth0 advertise 0xC autoneg on
# ethtool eth0
Settings for eth0:
Supported ports: [ TP ]
Supported link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
1000baseT/Full
Supported pause frame use: No
Supports auto-negotiation: Yes
Supported FEC modes: Not reported
Advertised link modes: 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
Advertised pause frame use: No
Advertised auto-negotiation: Yes
Advertised FEC modes: Not reported
Speed: 1000Mb/s
Duplex: Full
Port: Twisted Pair
PHYAD: 0
Transceiver: internal
Auto-negotiation: on
MDI-X: off (auto)
Supports Wake-on: umbg
Wake-on: d
Current message level: 0x00000007 (7)
drv probe link
Link detected: yes
# ethtool -s eth0 autoneg on
# ethtool eth0
Settings for eth0:
Supported ports: [ TP ]
Supported link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
1000baseT/Full
Supported pause frame use: No
Supports auto-negotiation: Yes
Supported FEC modes: Not reported
Advertised link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
1000baseT/Full
Advertised pause frame use: No
Advertised auto-negotiation: Yes
Advertised FEC modes: Not reported
Speed: 1000Mb/s
Duplex: Full
Port: Twisted Pair
PHYAD: 0
Transceiver: internal
Auto-negotiation: on
MDI-X: off (auto)
Supports Wake-on: umbg
Wake-on: d
Current message level: 0x00000007 (7)
drv probe link
Link detected: yes
Netlink:
# ethtool --version
ethtool version 5.8
# ethtool -s eth0 advertise 0xC autoneg on
# ethtool eth0
Settings for eth0:
Supported ports: [ TP ]
Supported link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
1000baseT/Full
Supported pause frame use: No
Supports auto-negotiation: Yes
Supported FEC modes: Not reported
Advertised link modes: 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
Advertised pause frame use: No
Advertised auto-negotiation: Yes
Advertised FEC modes: Not reported
Speed: 1000Mb/s
Duplex: Full
Auto-negotiation: on
Port: Twisted Pair
PHYAD: 0
Transceiver: internal
MDI-X: off (auto)
Supports Wake-on: umbg
Wake-on: d
Current message level: 0x00000007 (7)
drv probe link
Link detected: yes
# ethtool -s eth0 autoneg on
# ethtool eth0
Settings for eth0:
Supported ports: [ TP ]
Supported link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
1000baseT/Full
Supported pause frame use: No
Supports auto-negotiation: Yes
Supported FEC modes: Not reported
Advertised link modes: 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
Advertised pause frame use: No
Advertised auto-negotiation: Yes
Advertised FEC modes: Not reported
Speed: 1000Mb/s
Duplex: Full
Auto-negotiation: on
Port: Twisted Pair
PHYAD: 0
Transceiver: internal
MDI-X: off (auto)
Supports Wake-on: umbg
Wake-on: d
Current message level: 0x00000007 (7)
drv probe link
Link detected: yes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-30 7:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-29 16:02 [RFC PATCH net] ethtool: Fix incompatibility between netlink and ioctl interfaces Ido Schimmel
2020-09-29 16:44 ` Michal Kubecek
2020-09-30 7:25 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2020-09-30 8:59 ` Michal Kubecek
2020-09-30 14:19 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-09-30 14:35 ` Ido Schimmel
2020-09-30 14:43 ` Ido Schimmel
2020-09-30 20:06 ` Ido Schimmel
2020-09-30 20:45 ` Michal Kubecek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200930072529.GA1788067@shredder \
--to=idosch@idosch.org \
--cc=amcohen@nvidia.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=ayal@nvidia.com \
--cc=danieller@nvidia.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=mkubecek@suse.cz \
--cc=mlxsw@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.