From: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>
To: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
Jonathan Chocron <jonnyc@amazon.com>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com>
Cc: NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH dwc-next 0/3] PCI: dwc: remove useless dw_pcie_ops
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 16:56:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201005165657.0fd31b10@xhacker.debian> (raw)
Some designware based device driver especially host only driver may
work well with the default read_dbi/write_dbi/link_up implementation
in pcie-designware.c, thus remove the assumption to simplify those
drivers.
Jisheng Zhang (3):
PCI: dwc: Don't assume the ops in dw_pcie always exists
PCI: dwc: al: Remove useless dw_pcie_ops
PCI: dwc: imx6: Remove useless dw_pcie_ops
drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c | 5 -----
drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-al.c | 4 ----
drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c | 8 +++-----
drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c | 14 +++++++-------
4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
--
2.28.0
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>
To: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
Jonathan Chocron <jonnyc@amazon.com>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH dwc-next 0/3] PCI: dwc: remove useless dw_pcie_ops
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 16:56:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201005165657.0fd31b10@xhacker.debian> (raw)
Some designware based device driver especially host only driver may
work well with the default read_dbi/write_dbi/link_up implementation
in pcie-designware.c, thus remove the assumption to simplify those
drivers.
Jisheng Zhang (3):
PCI: dwc: Don't assume the ops in dw_pcie always exists
PCI: dwc: al: Remove useless dw_pcie_ops
PCI: dwc: imx6: Remove useless dw_pcie_ops
drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c | 5 -----
drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-al.c | 4 ----
drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c | 8 +++-----
drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c | 14 +++++++-------
4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
--
2.28.0
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next reply other threads:[~2020-10-05 9:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-05 8:56 Jisheng Zhang [this message]
2020-10-05 8:56 ` [PATCH dwc-next 0/3] PCI: dwc: remove useless dw_pcie_ops Jisheng Zhang
2020-10-05 8:57 ` [PATCH dwc-next 1/3] PCI: dwc: Don't assume the ops in dw_pcie always exists Jisheng Zhang
2020-10-05 8:57 ` Jisheng Zhang
2020-10-05 8:57 ` [PATCH dwc-next 2/3] PCI: dwc: al: Remove useless dw_pcie_ops Jisheng Zhang
2020-10-05 8:57 ` Jisheng Zhang
2020-10-05 9:03 ` [PATCH dwc-next 3/3] PCI: dwc: imx6: " Jisheng Zhang
2020-10-05 9:03 ` Jisheng Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201005165657.0fd31b10@xhacker.debian \
--to=jisheng.zhang@synaptics.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com \
--cc=hongxing.zhu@nxp.com \
--cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
--cc=jonnyc@amazon.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.