All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	ulf.hansson@linaro.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	nks@flawful.org, georgi.djakov@linaro.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] opp: Allow dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() to return -EPROBE_DEFER
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 17:28:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201016152802.GA3966@gerhold.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201016111222.lvakbmjhlrocpogt@bogus>

On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 12:12:22PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 07:00:21AM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 09:54:34AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > On 15-10-20, 19:05, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > > > OK, this breaks with SCMI which doesn't provide clocks but manage OPPs
> > > > directly. Before this change clk_get(dev..) was allowed to fail and
> > > > --EPROBE_DEFER was not an error.
> > >
> > > I think the change in itself is fine. We should be returning from
> > > there if we get EPROBE_DEFER. The question is rather why are you
> > > getting EPROBE_DEFER here ?
> > >
> >
> > Ah OK, I didn't spend too much time, saw -EPROBE_DEFER, just reverted
> > this patch and it worked. I need to check it in detail yet.
> >
> 
> You confused me earlier. As I said there will be no clock provider
> registered for SCMI CPU/Dev DVFS.
> 	opp_table->clk = clk_get(dev, NULL);
> will always return -EPROBE_DEFER as there is no clock provider for dev.

Shouldn't it return -ENOENT if there is no clock for the SCMI case?
With -EPROBE_DEFER I would expect that it shows up at some point.

I tried to avoid a situation like this by ignoring all errors
!= -EPROBE_DEFER. So if clk_get(dev, NULL) would return -ENOENT
everything should work as expected...

Thanks,
Stephan

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
	ulf.hansson@linaro.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
	nks@flawful.org, Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	georgi.djakov@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] opp: Allow dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() to return -EPROBE_DEFER
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 17:28:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201016152802.GA3966@gerhold.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201016111222.lvakbmjhlrocpogt@bogus>

On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 12:12:22PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 07:00:21AM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 09:54:34AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > On 15-10-20, 19:05, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > > > OK, this breaks with SCMI which doesn't provide clocks but manage OPPs
> > > > directly. Before this change clk_get(dev..) was allowed to fail and
> > > > --EPROBE_DEFER was not an error.
> > >
> > > I think the change in itself is fine. We should be returning from
> > > there if we get EPROBE_DEFER. The question is rather why are you
> > > getting EPROBE_DEFER here ?
> > >
> >
> > Ah OK, I didn't spend too much time, saw -EPROBE_DEFER, just reverted
> > this patch and it worked. I need to check it in detail yet.
> >
> 
> You confused me earlier. As I said there will be no clock provider
> registered for SCMI CPU/Dev DVFS.
> 	opp_table->clk = clk_get(dev, NULL);
> will always return -EPROBE_DEFER as there is no clock provider for dev.

Shouldn't it return -ENOENT if there is no clock for the SCMI case?
With -EPROBE_DEFER I would expect that it shows up at some point.

I tried to avoid a situation like this by ignoring all errors
!= -EPROBE_DEFER. So if clk_get(dev, NULL) would return -ENOENT
everything should work as expected...

Thanks,
Stephan

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-16 15:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-24  9:09 [PATCH V2 1/2] opp: Allow dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() to return -EPROBE_DEFER Viresh Kumar
2020-08-24  9:09 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-08-24  9:09 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] cpufreq: dt: Refactor initialization to handle probe deferral properly Viresh Kumar
2020-08-24 14:25   ` kernel test robot
2020-08-24 14:25   ` [PATCH] cpufreq: dt: fix semicolon.cocci warnings kernel test robot
2020-08-25  4:29     ` Viresh Kumar
2020-09-01  8:57   ` [PATCH V2 2/2] cpufreq: dt: Refactor initialization to handle probe deferral properly Marek Szyprowski
2020-09-01  9:45     ` Viresh Kumar
2020-09-01 10:05       ` Marek Szyprowski
2020-09-01 10:12         ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-13  9:47   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-10-13  9:56     ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-14 16:40       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-10-16  5:03         ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-16  6:44           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-10-16  8:07             ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-27 16:29               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-10-28  5:48                 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-28  9:49                   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-10-28  9:52                     ` Viresh Kumar
2020-08-24  9:17 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] opp: Allow dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() to return -EPROBE_DEFER Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-08-24  9:17   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-08-24 11:08 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-08-24 11:08   ` Ulf Hansson
2020-08-24 11:39 ` Stephan Gerhold
2020-08-24 11:39   ` Stephan Gerhold
2020-10-15 18:05 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-10-15 18:05   ` Sudeep Holla
2020-10-16  4:24   ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-16  4:24     ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-16  6:00     ` Sudeep Holla
2020-10-16  6:00       ` Sudeep Holla
2020-10-16 11:12       ` Sudeep Holla
2020-10-16 11:12         ` Sudeep Holla
2020-10-16 15:28         ` Stephan Gerhold [this message]
2020-10-16 15:28           ` Stephan Gerhold
2020-10-19  4:58         ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-19  4:58           ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-19  9:17           ` Sudeep Holla
2020-10-19  9:17             ` Sudeep Holla
2020-10-19  9:24             ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-19  9:24               ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-19 10:12               ` Sudeep Holla
2020-10-19 10:12                 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-10-19 10:35                 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-19 10:35                   ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-19 14:10                   ` Sudeep Holla
2020-10-19 14:10                     ` Sudeep Holla
2020-10-20  5:05                     ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-20  5:05                       ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-20  5:54                       ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-20  5:54                         ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-20  9:37                         ` Sudeep Holla
2020-10-20  9:37                           ` Sudeep Holla
2020-10-20  9:41                           ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-20  9:41                             ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-20  9:52                             ` Sudeep Holla
2020-10-20  9:52                               ` Sudeep Holla
2020-10-20  9:59                               ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-20  9:59                                 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-27 22:24 ` Guenter Roeck
2020-10-27 22:24   ` Guenter Roeck
2020-10-28  4:06   ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-28  4:06     ` Viresh Kumar
2020-10-28 17:29     ` Guenter Roeck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201016152802.GA3966@gerhold.net \
    --to=stephan@gerhold.net \
    --cc=georgi.djakov@linaro.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kgene@kernel.org \
    --cc=khilman@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nks@flawful.org \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=vireshk@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.