From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Cc: "Tian, Jun J" <jun.j.tian@intel.com>,
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"jean-philippe@linaro.org" <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
"stefanha@gmail.com" <stefanha@gmail.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Sun, Yi Y" <yi.y.sun@intel.com>,
"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"alex.williamson@redhat.com" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
"Zhu, Lingshan" <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>,
"Wu, Hao" <hao.wu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: (proposal) RE: [PATCH v7 00/16] vfio: expose virtual Shared Virtual Addressing to VMs
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 17:14:03 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201020201403.GP6219@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201020200844.GC86371@otc-nc-03>
On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 01:08:44PM -0700, Raj, Ashok wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 04:55:57PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 12:51:46PM -0700, Raj, Ashok wrote:
> > > I think we agreed (or agree to disagree and commit) for device types that
> > > we have for SIOV, VFIO based approach works well without having to re-invent
> > > another way to do the same things. Not looking for a shortcut by any means,
> > > but we need to plan around existing hardware though. Looks like vDPA took
> > > some shortcuts then to not abstract iommu uAPI instead :-)? When all
> > > necessary hardware was available.. This would be a solved puzzle.
> >
> > I think it is the opposite, vIOMMU and related has outgrown VFIO as
> > the "home" and needs to stand alone.
> >
> > Apparently the HW that will need PASID for vDPA is Intel HW, so if
>
> So just to make this clear, I did check internally if there are any plans
> for vDPA + SVM. There are none at the moment.
Not SVM, SIOV.
Jason
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Cc: "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"alex.williamson@redhat.com" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
"eric.auger@redhat.com" <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
"baolu.lu@linux.intel.com" <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
"joro@8bytes.org" <joro@8bytes.org>,
"jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com" <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>,
"Tian, Jun J" <jun.j.tian@intel.com>,
"Sun, Yi Y" <yi.y.sun@intel.com>,
"jean-philippe@linaro.org" <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
"peterx@redhat.com" <peterx@redhat.com>,
"Wu, Hao" <hao.wu@intel.com>,
"stefanha@gmail.com" <stefanha@gmail.com>,
"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Zhu, Lingshan" <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: (proposal) RE: [PATCH v7 00/16] vfio: expose virtual Shared Virtual Addressing to VMs
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 17:14:03 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201020201403.GP6219@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201020200844.GC86371@otc-nc-03>
On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 01:08:44PM -0700, Raj, Ashok wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 04:55:57PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 12:51:46PM -0700, Raj, Ashok wrote:
> > > I think we agreed (or agree to disagree and commit) for device types that
> > > we have for SIOV, VFIO based approach works well without having to re-invent
> > > another way to do the same things. Not looking for a shortcut by any means,
> > > but we need to plan around existing hardware though. Looks like vDPA took
> > > some shortcuts then to not abstract iommu uAPI instead :-)? When all
> > > necessary hardware was available.. This would be a solved puzzle.
> >
> > I think it is the opposite, vIOMMU and related has outgrown VFIO as
> > the "home" and needs to stand alone.
> >
> > Apparently the HW that will need PASID for vDPA is Intel HW, so if
>
> So just to make this clear, I did check internally if there are any plans
> for vDPA + SVM. There are none at the moment.
Not SVM, SIOV.
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-20 20:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 110+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-12 8:38 (proposal) RE: [PATCH v7 00/16] vfio: expose virtual Shared Virtual Addressing to VMs Tian, Kevin
2020-10-12 8:38 ` Tian, Kevin
2020-10-13 6:22 ` Jason Wang
2020-10-13 6:22 ` Jason Wang
2020-10-14 3:08 ` Tian, Kevin
2020-10-14 3:08 ` Tian, Kevin
2020-10-14 23:10 ` Alex Williamson
2020-10-14 23:10 ` Alex Williamson
2020-10-15 7:02 ` Jason Wang
2020-10-15 7:02 ` Jason Wang
2020-10-15 6:52 ` Jason Wang
2020-10-15 6:52 ` Jason Wang
2020-10-15 7:58 ` Tian, Kevin
2020-10-15 7:58 ` Tian, Kevin
2020-10-15 8:40 ` Jason Wang
2020-10-15 8:40 ` Jason Wang
2020-10-15 10:14 ` Liu, Yi L
2020-10-15 10:14 ` Liu, Yi L
2020-10-20 6:18 ` Jason Wang
2020-10-20 6:18 ` Jason Wang
2020-10-20 8:19 ` Liu, Yi L
2020-10-20 8:19 ` Liu, Yi L
2020-10-20 9:19 ` Jason Wang
2020-10-20 9:19 ` Jason Wang
2020-10-20 9:40 ` Liu, Yi L
2020-10-20 9:40 ` Liu, Yi L
2020-10-20 13:54 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-10-20 13:54 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-10-20 14:00 ` Liu, Yi L
2020-10-20 14:00 ` Liu, Yi L
2020-10-20 14:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-10-20 14:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-10-20 14:09 ` Liu, Yi L
2020-10-20 14:09 ` Liu, Yi L
2020-10-13 10:27 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2020-10-13 10:27 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2020-10-14 2:11 ` Tian, Kevin
2020-10-14 2:11 ` Tian, Kevin
2020-10-14 3:16 ` Tian, Kevin
2020-10-14 3:16 ` Tian, Kevin
2020-10-16 15:36 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-10-16 15:36 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-10-19 8:39 ` Liu, Yi L
2020-10-19 8:39 ` Liu, Yi L
2020-10-19 14:25 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-10-19 14:25 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-10-20 10:21 ` Liu, Yi L
2020-10-20 10:21 ` Liu, Yi L
2020-10-20 14:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-10-20 14:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-10-20 14:19 ` Liu, Yi L
2020-10-20 14:19 ` Liu, Yi L
2020-10-21 2:21 ` Jason Wang
2020-10-21 2:21 ` Jason Wang
2020-10-20 16:24 ` Raj, Ashok
2020-10-20 16:24 ` Raj, Ashok
2020-10-20 17:03 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-10-20 17:03 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-10-20 19:51 ` Raj, Ashok
2020-10-20 19:51 ` Raj, Ashok
2020-10-20 19:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-10-20 19:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-10-20 20:08 ` Raj, Ashok
2020-10-20 20:08 ` Raj, Ashok
2020-10-20 20:14 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2020-10-20 20:14 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-10-20 20:27 ` Raj, Ashok
2020-10-20 20:27 ` Raj, Ashok
2020-10-21 11:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-10-21 11:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-10-21 17:51 ` Raj, Ashok
2020-10-21 17:51 ` Raj, Ashok
2020-10-21 18:24 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-10-21 18:24 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-10-21 20:03 ` Raj, Ashok
2020-10-21 20:03 ` Raj, Ashok
2020-10-21 23:32 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-10-21 23:32 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-10-21 23:53 ` Raj, Ashok
2020-10-21 23:53 ` Raj, Ashok
2020-10-22 2:55 ` Jason Wang
2020-10-22 2:55 ` Jason Wang
2020-10-22 3:54 ` Liu, Yi L
2020-10-22 3:54 ` Liu, Yi L
2020-10-22 4:38 ` Jason Wang
2020-10-22 4:38 ` Jason Wang
2020-11-03 9:52 ` joro
2020-11-03 9:52 ` joro
2020-11-03 12:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-11-03 12:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-11-03 13:18 ` joro
2020-11-03 13:18 ` joro
2020-11-03 13:23 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-11-03 13:23 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-11-03 14:03 ` joro
2020-11-03 14:03 ` joro
2020-11-03 14:06 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-11-03 14:06 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-11-03 14:35 ` joro
2020-11-03 14:35 ` joro
2020-11-03 15:22 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-11-03 15:22 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-11-03 16:55 ` joro
2020-11-03 16:55 ` joro
2020-11-03 17:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-11-03 17:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-11-03 19:14 ` joro
2020-11-03 19:14 ` joro
2020-11-04 19:29 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-11-04 19:29 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201020201403.GP6219@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=hao.wu@intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=jun.j.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lingshan.zhu@intel.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=yi.y.sun@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.