From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt: Remove booting-without-of.rst
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 08:45:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201021084518.1eab6481@coco.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201008142420.2083861-2-robh@kernel.org>
Hi Rob,
Em Thu, 8 Oct 2020 09:24:20 -0500
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> escreveu:
> booting-without-of.rstt is an ancient document that first outlined
> Flattened DeviceTree on PowerPC initially. The DT world has evolved a
> lot in the 15 years since and booting-without-of.rst is pretty stale.
> The name of the document itself is confusing if you don't understand the
> evolution from real 'OpenFirmware'. Most of what booting-without-of.rst
> contains is now in the DT specification (which evolved out of the
> ePAPR). The few things that weren't documented in the DT specification
> are now.
>
> All that remains is the boot entry details, so let's move these to arch
> specific documents. The exception is arm which already has the same
> details documented.
Removing this document caused a warning at Documentation/arm/booting.rst:
$ ./scripts/documentation-file-ref-check
Documentation/arm/booting.rst: Documentation/devicetree/booting-without-of.rst
as it mentions that the DTB format is described on booting-without-of.rst:
4b. Setup the device tree
-------------------------
The boot loader must load a device tree image (dtb) into system ram
at a 64bit aligned address and initialize it with the boot data. The
dtb format is documented in Documentation/devicetree/booting-without-of.rst.
The kernel will look for the dtb magic value of 0xd00dfeed at the dtb
physical address to determine if a dtb has been passed instead of a
tagged list.
So, I guess that such part of the document needs to be moved to booting.rst.
Thanks,
Mauro
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt: Remove booting-without-of.rst
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 06:45:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201021084518.1eab6481@coco.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201008142420.2083861-2-robh@kernel.org>
Hi Rob,
Em Thu, 8 Oct 2020 09:24:20 -0500
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> escreveu:
> booting-without-of.rstt is an ancient document that first outlined
> Flattened DeviceTree on PowerPC initially. The DT world has evolved a
> lot in the 15 years since and booting-without-of.rst is pretty stale.
> The name of the document itself is confusing if you don't understand the
> evolution from real 'OpenFirmware'. Most of what booting-without-of.rst
> contains is now in the DT specification (which evolved out of the
> ePAPR). The few things that weren't documented in the DT specification
> are now.
>
> All that remains is the boot entry details, so let's move these to arch
> specific documents. The exception is arm which already has the same
> details documented.
Removing this document caused a warning at Documentation/arm/booting.rst:
$ ./scripts/documentation-file-ref-check
Documentation/arm/booting.rst: Documentation/devicetree/booting-without-of.rst
as it mentions that the DTB format is described on booting-without-of.rst:
4b. Setup the device tree
-------------------------
The boot loader must load a device tree image (dtb) into system ram
at a 64bit aligned address and initialize it with the boot data. The
dtb format is documented in Documentation/devicetree/booting-without-of.rst.
The kernel will look for the dtb magic value of 0xd00dfeed at the dtb
physical address to determine if a dtb has been passed instead of a
tagged list.
So, I guess that such part of the document needs to be moved to booting.rst.
Thanks,
Mauro
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt: Remove booting-without-of.rst
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 08:45:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201021084518.1eab6481@coco.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201008142420.2083861-2-robh@kernel.org>
Hi Rob,
Em Thu, 8 Oct 2020 09:24:20 -0500
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> escreveu:
> booting-without-of.rstt is an ancient document that first outlined
> Flattened DeviceTree on PowerPC initially. The DT world has evolved a
> lot in the 15 years since and booting-without-of.rst is pretty stale.
> The name of the document itself is confusing if you don't understand the
> evolution from real 'OpenFirmware'. Most of what booting-without-of.rst
> contains is now in the DT specification (which evolved out of the
> ePAPR). The few things that weren't documented in the DT specification
> are now.
>
> All that remains is the boot entry details, so let's move these to arch
> specific documents. The exception is arm which already has the same
> details documented.
Removing this document caused a warning at Documentation/arm/booting.rst:
$ ./scripts/documentation-file-ref-check
Documentation/arm/booting.rst: Documentation/devicetree/booting-without-of.rst
as it mentions that the DTB format is described on booting-without-of.rst:
4b. Setup the device tree
-------------------------
The boot loader must load a device tree image (dtb) into system ram
at a 64bit aligned address and initialize it with the boot data. The
dtb format is documented in Documentation/devicetree/booting-without-of.rst.
The kernel will look for the dtb magic value of 0xd00dfeed at the dtb
physical address to determine if a dtb has been passed instead of a
tagged list.
So, I guess that such part of the document needs to be moved to booting.rst.
Thanks,
Mauro
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-21 6:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-08 14:24 [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: powerpc: Add a schema for the 'sleep' property Rob Herring
2020-10-08 14:24 ` Rob Herring
2020-10-08 14:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] dt: Remove booting-without-of.rst Rob Herring
2020-10-08 14:24 ` Rob Herring
2020-10-08 14:24 ` Rob Herring
2020-10-08 15:03 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-10-08 15:03 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-10-08 15:03 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-10-09 3:51 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-10-09 3:51 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-10-09 3:51 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-10-21 6:45 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab [this message]
2020-10-21 6:45 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-10-21 6:45 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-01-17 16:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: powerpc: Add a schema for the 'sleep' property Johan Jonker
2021-01-17 16:10 ` Johan Jonker
2021-01-17 16:10 ` Johan Jonker
2021-01-20 1:44 ` Rob Herring
2021-01-20 1:44 ` Rob Herring
2021-01-20 1:44 ` Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201021084518.1eab6481@coco.lan \
--to=mchehab+huawei@kernel.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dalias@libc.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.