From: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
To: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Cc: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
mst@redhat.com, jusual@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] acpi/crs: Support ranges > 32b for hosts
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 15:36:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201027153612.35e9faac@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201026193924.985014-2-ben.widawsky@intel.com>
On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 12:39:24 -0700
Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> wrote:
> According to PCIe spec 5.0 Type 1 header space Base Address Registers
> are defined by 7.5.1.2.1 Base Address Registers (same as Type 0). The
> _CRS region should allow for the same range (up to 64b). Prior to this
> change, any host bridge utilizing more than 32b for the BAR would have
> the address truncated and likely lead to conflicts when the operating
> systems reads the _CRS object.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Looks good to me, so
Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
CCing,
Michael to have a send pair of eyes on it
but I wonder how/why ivshm (which might have quite large BAR) works.
PS:
please use git's --cover-letter option to create multi-patch series,
in the future
>
> ---
> I don't think this effects any code currently in QEMU. You'd need to
> have a host bridge which has a BAR, and that BAR wants to be > 32b. I've
> hit this because I have a modified PXB device that does advertise a 64b
> BAR. Also, you'd need a platform that cares about ACPI, which, many do
> not.
> ---
> hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> index df13abecf4..75604bdc74 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> @@ -789,8 +789,14 @@ static Aml *build_crs(PCIHostState *host, CrsRangeSet *range_set)
> crs_range_insert(temp_range_set.io_ranges,
> range_base, range_limit);
> } else { /* "memory" */
> - crs_range_insert(temp_range_set.mem_ranges,
> - range_base, range_limit);
> + uint64_t length = range_limit - range_base + 1;
> + if (range_limit <= UINT32_MAX && length <= UINT32_MAX) {
> + crs_range_insert(temp_range_set.mem_ranges, range_base,
> + range_limit);
> + } else {
> + crs_range_insert(temp_range_set.mem_64bit_ranges,
> + range_base, range_limit);
> + }
> }
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-27 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-26 19:39 [PATCH 1/2] acpi/crs: Prevent bad ranges for host bridges Ben Widawsky
2020-10-26 19:39 ` [PATCH 2/2] acpi/crs: Support ranges > 32b for hosts Ben Widawsky
2020-10-27 14:36 ` Igor Mammedov [this message]
2020-10-27 15:45 ` Ben Widawsky
2020-10-29 13:57 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-10-29 13:59 ` [PATCH 1/2] acpi/crs: Prevent bad ranges for host bridges Igor Mammedov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201027153612.35e9faac@redhat.com \
--to=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=ben.widawsky@intel.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=jusual@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.